개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.8
- 수록면
- 243 - 266 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Tom Stoppard's RGAD, though based on Shakespeare work, Hamlet, has not much to do with Hamlet, which indicates certain 'non-relation' between RGAD and Hamlet. I argue that this 'non-relation,' rather than meaning there is nothing between RGAD and Hamlet, can be thought as denoting a profound relation between them, which insists on the power of 'divergence' and 'decentering' in Deleuze's concept of 'simulacrum'. This 'simulacrum', negating both original and copy, allows both RGAD and Hamlet subversive and rebellious. Thus, RGAD and Hamlet form divergent series founded on the eccentric circle with a constantly decentered center. The 'simulacrum' is expressed in RGAD and Hamlet as a way of portraying and urging the awakening of consciousness and the need for human choice in taking responsibility for us and others. This paper interrogates how Stoppard realizes this revolutionary spirit of 'simulacrum' within his work, RGAD.
For Stoppard, the identity of man is not something that is matured by accepting his own mortality and finitude but something enriched with his consistent pursuit in the truth. But Ros and Guil, unfortunately, standing before their coming deaths, do not make any choice and take action. They just follow the things as they are told, comforting themselves, until things happen to them. Passive in proceeding the work related to themselves but also to Hamlet, they do not take action in making some change in their present state. Often self-conscious and discontented with their state, they try to avoid the anxiety or the fear by relying on philosophical logic, meaningless question-answer games, and ridiculous acts, but do not feel any responsibility for their state and make meaningful action. In the sense of emphasizing the subject's responsibility, Stoppard's stance is differentiated from the Player's advice to Ros and Guil. The Player, though characterized as substantial and supremely confident, does not tell the truth. What the Player espouses is that a person should act natural and conform to the present reality. The Player's insistence that one should merely respond to circumstances, though acceptable as a proposal to explain human situation prisoned in the reality, it is certainly the fatalism or the conformism. These cannot be stated as truth. In RGAD, Stoppard guides the audience to the awakening of consciousness and the change of action by erasing the distinction between reality and fantasy. By breaking the boundary between reality and fantasy, it makes the spectator not to remain as an onlooker but as a participant. The stage does not remain as the place they can confirm their fantasy, but is changed into the space they can think as more real than reality, thus believe their reality can be always radicalized by this new space.
For Stoppard, the identity of man is not something that is matured by accepting his own mortality and finitude but something enriched with his consistent pursuit in the truth. But Ros and Guil, unfortunately, standing before their coming deaths, do not make any choice and take action. They just follow the things as they are told, comforting themselves, until things happen to them. Passive in proceeding the work related to themselves but also to Hamlet, they do not take action in making some change in their present state. Often self-conscious and discontented with their state, they try to avoid the anxiety or the fear by relying on philosophical logic, meaningless question-answer games, and ridiculous acts, but do not feel any responsibility for their state and make meaningful action. In the sense of emphasizing the subject's responsibility, Stoppard's stance is differentiated from the Player's advice to Ros and Guil. The Player, though characterized as substantial and supremely confident, does not tell the truth. What the Player espouses is that a person should act natural and conform to the present reality. The Player's insistence that one should merely respond to circumstances, though acceptable as a proposal to explain human situation prisoned in the reality, it is certainly the fatalism or the conformism. These cannot be stated as truth. In RGAD, Stoppard guides the audience to the awakening of consciousness and the change of action by erasing the distinction between reality and fantasy. By breaking the boundary between reality and fantasy, it makes the spectator not to remain as an onlooker but as a participant. The stage does not remain as the place they can confirm their fantasy, but is changed into the space they can think as more real than reality, thus believe their reality can be always radicalized by this new space.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction - ‘Simulacrum’ in Hamlet and RGAD
Ⅱ. Revolutionary Spirit (‘Simulacrum’) in RGAD : Urging the Subject to be faithful to the Truth-Event
Ⅲ. Conclusion
Works Cited
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Stoppard After Shakespeare : Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
2011 .02
-
Tom Stoppard의 The Real Thing에 나타난 실제와 허구의 대비
인문학연구
2006 .02
-
스토파드 초기 극의 역사적 맥락 분석 : 60년대 70년대 영국 연극 동향과 비교하여
현대영미드라마
2012 .12
-
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead에서 드러나는 다양한 컨텍스트
현대영미드라마
2001 .04
-
James Joyce Vindicated in Tom Stoppard's Travesties
현대영미드라마
2007 .12
-
Tom Stoppard의 Hapgood과 포스트뉴튼적 인식론의 가능성
현대영미드라마
1999 .11
-
스토파드의 셰익스피어 다시 쓰기/읽기
영어영문학연구
2006 .01
-
Re-reading Hamlet: Focusing on Hamlet’s Quest for the Truth
영어영문학연구
2008 .01
-
톰 스토파드의 메타드라마와 극적 재현의 문제 : The Real Thing의 경우
현대영미드라마
2003 .08
-
톰 스토파드의 동구권 소재 극작품에 나타난 정치성과 연극적 형상화
현대영미드라마
2012 .12
-
『햄릿』영화들과 정동
새한영어영문학
2016 .02
-
『햄릿』의 각색과 영화적 변용
국제언어문학
2017 .04
-
셰익스피어와 톰 스타파드가 풀이하는 인간의 죽음 : 리차드 3세, 햄렛, 로젠크렌츠와 길든스턴은 죽었다
외국문학연구
1997 .12
-
Textual and Verbal Playfulness in Stoppard's Travesties : Mise-en-abyme as a Foregrounding Device
현대영미드라마
2011 .04
-
Death of Hamlet
Shakespeare Review
1991 .06
-
Against Radical Revolutionaries : The Treatment of Lenin and Tzara in Tom Stoppard's Travesties
현대영미드라마
2004 .04
-
갈등의 양상과 의미 : 햄릿의 독백을 중심으로
동서인문학
2010 .12
-
윤리적, 정치적 문제에 대한 스토파드의 작가적 참여 : The Coast of Utopia 삼부작 극을 중심으로
현대영미드라마
2015 .12
-
Human Nature in Hamlet
비평문학
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-842-003646927