지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article, is essentially the usability that a research methodology dealing with 'concepts' could have as an analytic approach in studying Korea's colonization during the Japanese occupation period. In this article, statistical data regarding terms and concepts will be mainly dealt with. And it will be attempted to develop a comprehensive and effective method of analysis concentrating upon both the issue of quality and quantity, and employing both synchronic and diachronic approaches.
Total of 199 types of terms related to the concept of 'mass' are extracted from journals and bulletins such as Gae'byeok , Byeol'geon'gon and 『Samcheon'ri』. In processing them, first, terms which showed considerable shifts in the frequency of their usage were assorted into two groups, namely the ‘Social movement' group and the 'Popular culture’ group. And in consideration of time periods displayed in the usage of terms that belonged to those groups, three time periods were established, which could be respectively labelled as the 'Social movement concentration period,' 'Period of two phenomena in juxtaposition,' and 'Popular culture concentration period.' Second, putting the apparent trend aside for the moment, it should be noted that 'general(全稱)' terms which showed very little changes in the frequency of usage could be regarded as showing the most substantial or even fundamental flow of changes in the usage of 'mass'-related terms, so they were examined with details in this study as well. And third, to fill in the blanks that could be still remaining, the historical meaning of the four critical time points are discussed as 'wordfield('意味場')', and are elaborated upon as well. It was an attempt to secure a synchronic approach, which could complement the diachronic approaches attempted in the first and second tasks.
In the first period(1920~1925), the Socialists rather led the usage of the 'mass' concept, in order to set it apart from the 'people(民衆)' concept that had been widely used since the outbreak of the March 1st Movement. Yet at first, they did not use the term as an independent concept. They rather used it in association with another concept, like 'Proletarian.' Moreover, they failed to integrate the term with a Socialist aspect and establish it as a term describing a 'subject engaged in a cause or movement.' This period clearly shows an infant stage in terms of embracing a concept.
In the 2nd period(1926~1933), the ‘mass' concept escaped the confinements of referring to only the 'Proletarians,' and began to be used in various meanings, and in many cases the concept was used in positive terms as 'entities associated with social movements.' During this time period, in the wake of discussions debating whether to dissolve the Shin'gan-hwe party(新幹會) or not, the term that was most prominently used switched from 'Proletarian mass' to 'mass of Peasants and Workers', transforming the concept from merely referring to the general Proletarian class to referring to the agricultural and industrial workers in particular. Meanwhile, in this time period the concept already started to emerge not only in the 'social movement' context but also in the 'popular culture' context as well, yet such new phenomenon was not yet distinct enough to be mentioned with regard to the historical meaning of year 1931.
In the 3rd period(1934~1942), the time before the China-Japan war and the time after the war showed some differences. Before the war, terms in league with the 'popular culture' group were more frequently used, reflecting the growth of the urban popular culture and the dissolution of the Shin'gan-hwe party. Then after the war, and when the so-called 'Wartime Mobilization period' began, the concept of 'mass' was practically rendered meaningless. Instead, a new concept of ‘state citizen(국민)’ surfaced, while the 'people' concept began to be frequently used again.
Total of 199 types of terms related to the concept of 'mass' are extracted from journals and bulletins such as Gae'byeok , Byeol'geon'gon and 『Samcheon'ri』. In processing them, first, terms which showed considerable shifts in the frequency of their usage were assorted into two groups, namely the ‘Social movement' group and the 'Popular culture’ group. And in consideration of time periods displayed in the usage of terms that belonged to those groups, three time periods were established, which could be respectively labelled as the 'Social movement concentration period,' 'Period of two phenomena in juxtaposition,' and 'Popular culture concentration period.' Second, putting the apparent trend aside for the moment, it should be noted that 'general(全稱)' terms which showed very little changes in the frequency of usage could be regarded as showing the most substantial or even fundamental flow of changes in the usage of 'mass'-related terms, so they were examined with details in this study as well. And third, to fill in the blanks that could be still remaining, the historical meaning of the four critical time points are discussed as 'wordfield('意味場')', and are elaborated upon as well. It was an attempt to secure a synchronic approach, which could complement the diachronic approaches attempted in the first and second tasks.
In the first period(1920~1925), the Socialists rather led the usage of the 'mass' concept, in order to set it apart from the 'people(民衆)' concept that had been widely used since the outbreak of the March 1st Movement. Yet at first, they did not use the term as an independent concept. They rather used it in association with another concept, like 'Proletarian.' Moreover, they failed to integrate the term with a Socialist aspect and establish it as a term describing a 'subject engaged in a cause or movement.' This period clearly shows an infant stage in terms of embracing a concept.
In the 2nd period(1926~1933), the ‘mass' concept escaped the confinements of referring to only the 'Proletarians,' and began to be used in various meanings, and in many cases the concept was used in positive terms as 'entities associated with social movements.' During this time period, in the wake of discussions debating whether to dissolve the Shin'gan-hwe party(新幹會) or not, the term that was most prominently used switched from 'Proletarian mass' to 'mass of Peasants and Workers', transforming the concept from merely referring to the general Proletarian class to referring to the agricultural and industrial workers in particular. Meanwhile, in this time period the concept already started to emerge not only in the 'social movement' context but also in the 'popular culture' context as well, yet such new phenomenon was not yet distinct enough to be mentioned with regard to the historical meaning of year 1931.
In the 3rd period(1934~1942), the time before the China-Japan war and the time after the war showed some differences. Before the war, terms in league with the 'popular culture' group were more frequently used, reflecting the growth of the urban popular culture and the dissolution of the Shin'gan-hwe party. Then after the war, and when the so-called 'Wartime Mobilization period' began, the concept of 'mass' was practically rendered meaningless. Instead, a new concept of ‘state citizen(국민)’ surfaced, while the 'people' concept began to be frequently used again.
목차
머리말
1. ‘대중‘ 개념의 현황과 접근방법
2. ‘대중‘개념의 시기별 변동
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김재용 / 2009 / 프로문학 논쟁 in: 논쟁으로 읽는 한국사2 / 역사비평사
2. [단행본] - 김정인 / 2007 / 개벽 에 비친 식민지 조선의 얼굴 / 도서출판 모시는사람들
3. [학위논문] - 박종린 / 2006 / 日帝下社會主義思想의 受容에 關한 硏究 / 박사 / 연세대학교 대학원
4. [단행본] - 염인호 / 2008 / 항일전선 통일과 민족해방운동 in: 새로운 한국사 길잡이 하 / 지식산업사
5. [단행본] - 윤해동 / 2004 / 식민지 근대와 대중사회의 등장 in: 비판과 연대를 위한 동아시아 역사포럼 기획, 국사의 신화를 넘어서 / 휴머니스트
2. [단행본] - 김정인 / 2007 / 개벽 에 비친 식민지 조선의 얼굴 / 도서출판 모시는사람들
3. [학위논문] - 박종린 / 2006 / 日帝下社會主義思想의 受容에 關한 硏究 / 박사 / 연세대학교 대학원
4. [단행본] - 염인호 / 2008 / 항일전선 통일과 민족해방운동 in: 새로운 한국사 길잡이 하 / 지식산업사
5. [단행본] - 윤해동 / 2004 / 식민지 근대와 대중사회의 등장 in: 비판과 연대를 위한 동아시아 역사포럼 기획, 국사의 신화를 넘어서 / 휴머니스트
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대중의 정체성에 관한 연구
철학논총
2017 .01
-
한·일 대중문화(영화)에 나타난 국가주의 비판의 이중성 : '아래로부터'의 동아시아 담론을 위한 시론
아시아문화연구
2005 .02
-
탈 국경시대의 지역통합 : 대중 문화의 역할에 관한 시론적 고찰
일본문화연구
2015 .01
-
1930년대 한국 도시문화와 대중음악
한국문학논총
2006 .01
-
大衆文學試論 : 새로운 논의를 위한 하나의 瞥見
인문과학연구
2005 .06
-
한국전쟁의 기본개념으로서 제한전(limited war)의 성립과 분화 : 한반도에 대한 전략적 가치 평가와 관련하여
한국사연구
2004 .06
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
기독교 대중문화 연구: 기독교문화교육의 관점에서
기독교교육정보
2005 .12
-
일본대중문화에 대한 차별성과 선정적 이미지에 관한 고찰
비교민속학
2000 .08
-
大衆音樂의 敎育的 責任과 役割
한국사상과 문화
2009 .01
-
대중문화의 특징과 대학채플
대학과 복음
2003 .12
-
Collapse of Traditional Culture and Confusion in Mass Culture : An Experience of Koreans Since World War Ⅱ
Korea Journal
1976 .09
-
종교와 대중문화의 관계 시론
종교연구
2007 .09
-
The Korean War 1950-1953
Korea Journal
1967 .07
-
재한 서구 개신교 선교사와 제1차 세계대전 : 「한국선교지(Korea Mission Field)」를 중심으로
신학연구
2014 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003636718