지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There is the problem to solve at historical dimension between Korea and Japan. This problem may be the subject to be solved first in popular culture of the both countires and in the dimension of the masses culture exchange of East-Asia.
The mass culture exchange to jumping on at Western Europe capitalism logic without to solve a essential problem which have been inhered at popular culture that nationalism, racism to make discrimination and distinction has many possibility that East-Asia culture discourse distorts and restores to the unhistorical thing.
If the mass culture exchange flatters simply at a mass psychology. The regiment possible of the counter discourse about the survival and Human right of the citizen will disappear gradually.
From now on the confusion of East-Asia of cultural Identity will be accelerated gradually. Cultural identity to be shaken may become the opportunity to recognize East-Asia culture newly.
The marketing of popular culture which jump on the Korea wave phenomena must not access therefore in the dimension of a commerce strategy. The thing which the masses culture industry have been based thoroughly on a commerce attention and capitalism logic is true.
It can fall easily to the tool of a control ideology. The distinction does not become any purpose if a product concept is introduced at the cultrue.
The purpose resolves rapidly to a quantity value and the activity mode of various culture is to lose original internal content. We must restore the voice of the minority to be restraining in East-Asia culture. To make the voice of the neighbors coexits with the center is therefore for popular culture.
The popular culture of East-Asia must exist as a difference different from popular culture of Western Europe. The popular culture of East-Asia is the facing subject to coexist as sublate the pribvilege with the popular culture of Western Europe. Hollywood is not the index of a modern popular culture to follow but only a culture object which coexists to the difference.
In popular East-Asia culture exchange, the reason why the reason must be interested in the voice of the neighbors is here.
The mass culture exchange to jumping on at Western Europe capitalism logic without to solve a essential problem which have been inhered at popular culture that nationalism, racism to make discrimination and distinction has many possibility that East-Asia culture discourse distorts and restores to the unhistorical thing.
If the mass culture exchange flatters simply at a mass psychology. The regiment possible of the counter discourse about the survival and Human right of the citizen will disappear gradually.
From now on the confusion of East-Asia of cultural Identity will be accelerated gradually. Cultural identity to be shaken may become the opportunity to recognize East-Asia culture newly.
The marketing of popular culture which jump on the Korea wave phenomena must not access therefore in the dimension of a commerce strategy. The thing which the masses culture industry have been based thoroughly on a commerce attention and capitalism logic is true.
It can fall easily to the tool of a control ideology. The distinction does not become any purpose if a product concept is introduced at the cultrue.
The purpose resolves rapidly to a quantity value and the activity mode of various culture is to lose original internal content. We must restore the voice of the minority to be restraining in East-Asia culture. To make the voice of the neighbors coexits with the center is therefore for popular culture.
The popular culture of East-Asia must exist as a difference different from popular culture of Western Europe. The popular culture of East-Asia is the facing subject to coexist as sublate the pribvilege with the popular culture of Western Europe. Hollywood is not the index of a modern popular culture to follow but only a culture object which coexists to the difference.
In popular East-Asia culture exchange, the reason why the reason must be interested in the voice of the neighbors is here.
목차
Ⅰ. 동아시아 문화담론과 대중문화
Ⅱ. 한·일대중문화의 이중성: 또 하나의 파시즘
Ⅲ. 우리 ‘안‘의 오리엔탈리즘
Ⅳ. ‘주변적 주체‘의 연대 가능성을 위하여
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
탈 국경시대의 지역통합 : 대중 문화의 역할에 관한 시론적 고찰
일본문화연구
2015 .01
-
Popular Discourses on Korean Culture : From the Late 1980s to the Present
Korea Journal
2003 .03
-
기독교 대중문화 연구: 기독교문화교육의 관점에서
기독교교육정보
2005 .12
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .04
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .03
-
한류를 통해 바라본 미래 대중문화의 방향과 기독교 문화교육
선교와 신학
2013 .02
-
대중의 정체성에 관한 연구
철학논총
2017 .01
-
문화 속의 우리와 타자 - 문화의 지역성과 세계성
철학연구
2003 .08
-
문화학으로서의 한국학 : 특히 동아시아 한국학을 위하여
한국학논집
2009 .06
-
2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 영어 교과서의 문화 내용 분석
언어과학연구
2020 .09
-
초등 3학년 영어교과서 문화 분석 및 체험중심 문화지도 방안 제언
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
Characteristics of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1963 .06
-
한국어 문화 교재의 개발 영역과 문화 교육 모형의 개발
다문화와 평화
2013 .01
-
유교와 기독교의 대중문화관 비교
기독교사회윤리
2004 .01
-
〈별들의 고향〉을 통해 본 1970년대 대중 문화와 문학의 존재 양상에 관한 일 고찰
한국현대문학연구
2003 .06
-
해외 거주 한국어 초급 학습자 대상 한국 문화 교육 방안 연구
이중언어학
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
근현대 한국인의 중국 인식의 궤적
정문상
한국근대문학연구
2012
.04
근대와 틀근대의 동아시아를 위한 서사(序詞) : 『동아시아의 귀환』/ 백영서 지음 / 창작과비평사 / 2000
정재서
황해문화
2001
.03
‘동아시아공동체’ 구상과 한반도 : 일본의 한국병탄 100주년을 맞아
백낙청
역사비평
2010
.08
동아시아인의 정체성 형성, 장애와 출구 : 비판적 동아시아담론을 중심으로
임춘성
문화과학
2010
.03
한일관계의 현상과 미래비전 : 동아시아 공동발전을 향한 한일 공통과제ㆍ공통 정책의 가능성
정선철
정치정보연구
2005
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0