지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The introduction of a law school system in Korea is a contentious subject. The involved institutions comprise the government, universities, the Korean Bar Association and the judiciary.
In the beginning, there was considerable resistance against the plans for a law school system. The government decided nevertheless to change the law education system in anticipation of the opening of the law service market. The Korean government intends to conclude FTAs with the USA, China and Japan. If this plan materializes the Korean law service market will face international competition with global law firms. Then, it will become a social necessity to introduce a law school system in order to protect the rights of the Korean people in international legal disputes as the present law education system does not provide a competitive edge to the local lawyers.
The Korean Bar Association is adamant about the number of students who should be allowed to enter law schools. It asserts a yearly quota of 1200 persons. The law departments of the universities insist on a number of 3000 students. The main reason for this conflict lies in differing views on the legal position of lawyers. They themselves ascribe an official character to their position, which is in general disputed by the universities.
Under those circumstances, I suggest that the law school system should be redesigned, as it will not provide the envisioned effects in form of improved competitiveness. To cope with the opening of the law service market each law department should be able to choose its own focus and specialization in the law field. Then the applicants will be able to choose those law schools that match their professional ambitions best. This would also make redundant the need for the government to allocate quotas or get mixed up in the management of the law schools.
Many proponents of the law school system deem it necessary for the solution of domestic problems like the excessive number of students preparing for the lawyer examination. They misunderstand or underestimate the much more important international perspective of the law schools.
In the future, Korean lawyers must be able to open offices in China, India and the USA. Korean lawyers must acquire expertise in foreign law. To make that possible, the government has to redesign the present law school scheme with an orientation towards the international law service market in mind.
In conclusion, the quotas as well as the specialisation of the law schools must be up to the universities in order to enhance their international competitiveness on the global law service market.
In the beginning, there was considerable resistance against the plans for a law school system. The government decided nevertheless to change the law education system in anticipation of the opening of the law service market. The Korean government intends to conclude FTAs with the USA, China and Japan. If this plan materializes the Korean law service market will face international competition with global law firms. Then, it will become a social necessity to introduce a law school system in order to protect the rights of the Korean people in international legal disputes as the present law education system does not provide a competitive edge to the local lawyers.
The Korean Bar Association is adamant about the number of students who should be allowed to enter law schools. It asserts a yearly quota of 1200 persons. The law departments of the universities insist on a number of 3000 students. The main reason for this conflict lies in differing views on the legal position of lawyers. They themselves ascribe an official character to their position, which is in general disputed by the universities.
Under those circumstances, I suggest that the law school system should be redesigned, as it will not provide the envisioned effects in form of improved competitiveness. To cope with the opening of the law service market each law department should be able to choose its own focus and specialization in the law field. Then the applicants will be able to choose those law schools that match their professional ambitions best. This would also make redundant the need for the government to allocate quotas or get mixed up in the management of the law schools.
Many proponents of the law school system deem it necessary for the solution of domestic problems like the excessive number of students preparing for the lawyer examination. They misunderstand or underestimate the much more important international perspective of the law schools.
In the future, Korean lawyers must be able to open offices in China, India and the USA. Korean lawyers must acquire expertise in foreign law. To make that possible, the government has to redesign the present law school scheme with an orientation towards the international law service market in mind.
In conclusion, the quotas as well as the specialisation of the law schools must be up to the universities in order to enhance their international competitiveness on the global law service market.
목차
【ABSTRACT】
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 로스쿨 도입을 위한 사회적 논의
Ⅲ. 로스쿨 도입의 필요성에 대한 논의
Ⅳ. 선진국의 로스쿨 제도
Ⅴ. 국제화와 법률시장개방에 대처한 로스쿨 설립의 기본방향
Ⅵ. 지방화시대와 로스쿨 설립방향
Ⅶ. 국제화시대에 대처하기 위한 로스쿨 설립 기본방향과 설립 인가기준과 법과대학의 존폐문제
Ⅷ. 결론
〈參考文獻〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WHAT IS LAW
저스티스
1965 .04
-
충남대학교 법학전문대학원의 민법 교육과정 및 교육방법
법학연구
2008 .12
-
로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
법학전문대학원의 현재적 문제와 미래적 과제
법과정책
2018 .01
-
한·중 환경기본법 비교 : 중국의 「환경보호법」을 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .08
-
일본 법과대학원에 있어서의 민사법의 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화
서강법학
2008 .12
-
캐나다의 로-스쿨에 대한 고찰
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
법학전문대학원에서의 임상법학교육방법론
원광법학
2008 .01
-
로스쿨에서의 형사실무 교육방법
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
Introduction to U.S. Law Schools’ Pragmatic Education and Career Services
법학연구
2018 .09
-
미국 상사법의 개별입법화 동향
기업법연구
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-336-003123720