지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.6
- 수록면
- 187 - 211 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze Ran as Kurosawa's special adaptation of King Lear, and to explore the reason Ran gets the best compliments compared with the other films of King Lear produced in Western countries. Kurosawa shows an eastern view of the world which is represented by the rotating cycle of the past, the present, and the future, while we find some different western views of Shakespeare's King Lear, such as dual conflicts between good and evil, and between old generation and new generation. The suffering and unhappiness which Kurosawa's hero, Hydetora endures are presented as the result of his past cruel behaviors. However, Kurosawa's view of the world is not moralistic, but quite pessimistic. Both the innocent and the criminal cannot avoid pain and death. The innocent can't change the world, being the victims of this evil world.
The world Kurosawa portrays is the one full of pain and agony rather than evil and corruption, while Shakespeare in King Lear criticizes the corrupted world where liars and thieves prosper, and where the powerful and the wealthy don't care the poor. The world upside down is what Shakespeare portrays through the suffering of Lear who goes through the fall from a king to a mad beggar. This subverted life of a king and his realization of the truth becomes the typical fate of a tragic hero in the traditional sense of tragedy, and the prerequisite of the renewal of human life in this world. Therefore, while the world of King Lear may suggest morality and change through condemnation and mockery, the world of Ran denies the possibility of hope and change through desperation and death.
The reason why Ran gets more compliments than other films of King Lear lies not only in Kurosawa's excellent camera techniques and the screen constitution of symbolic solemnity. Kurosawa succeeds in presenting the essential view of human cruelty and the pessimistic world by using the main plot of King Lear, in which an old man is betrayed by his own children. He adapted this view of the world to a historical age of Samurai in Japan. In King Lear, we can find more complex and various views of the world and human life. However, in Ran, we can find more painful and desperate views of the world, which is represented through beautiful scenery and calm appreciation.
The world Kurosawa portrays is the one full of pain and agony rather than evil and corruption, while Shakespeare in King Lear criticizes the corrupted world where liars and thieves prosper, and where the powerful and the wealthy don't care the poor. The world upside down is what Shakespeare portrays through the suffering of Lear who goes through the fall from a king to a mad beggar. This subverted life of a king and his realization of the truth becomes the typical fate of a tragic hero in the traditional sense of tragedy, and the prerequisite of the renewal of human life in this world. Therefore, while the world of King Lear may suggest morality and change through condemnation and mockery, the world of Ran denies the possibility of hope and change through desperation and death.
The reason why Ran gets more compliments than other films of King Lear lies not only in Kurosawa's excellent camera techniques and the screen constitution of symbolic solemnity. Kurosawa succeeds in presenting the essential view of human cruelty and the pessimistic world by using the main plot of King Lear, in which an old man is betrayed by his own children. He adapted this view of the world to a historical age of Samurai in Japan. In King Lear, we can find more complex and various views of the world and human life. However, in Ran, we can find more painful and desperate views of the world, which is represented through beautiful scenery and calm appreciation.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
셰익스피어 텍스트의 현대적 수용 및 의미의 재생산의 문제 : 구로사와의 『란』을 통해 본 셰익스피어의 개작과 영화화를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2000 .03
-
King Lear에 나타난 non-communication연구
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
말과 眞實 : King Lear를 中心으로
Shakespeare Review
1973 .04
-
King Lear의 영적 자아
영어영문학
1992 .05
-
The Significance of Some Images of King Lear
Shakespeare Review
1986 .08
-
King Lear에 나타난 이상주의
Shakespeare Review
1996 .06
-
『리어왕』(King Lear)의 기독교적 해석
영어영문학연구
2004 .01
-
King Lear에 나타난 시간과 의미의 부재
동서문화
1997 .02
-
Appearance and Reality in King Lear
Shakespeare Review
1985 .08
-
「리어왕」에 나타나는 노인문제
Shakespeare Review
2012 .09
-
Studies of Shakespeare's Four Great Tragedies in Korea (Ⅱ) : Macbeth and King Lear
동서문화
1992 .12
-
키츠의 시를 통해 보는 『리어왕』: 「다시 한 번 『리어왕』을 읽으려고 앉아서」
영미어문학
2020 .01
-
King Lear 硏究 : 心象과 性格發展
Shakespeare Review
1974 .04
-
리어왕의 질문 “나는 누구인가?”에 대한 아시아인의 응답 : 한국과 싱가포르의 다시공연하기 사례를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2018 .12
-
리어의 고난과 고통 그리고 결말
영어영문학
2013 .12
-
셰익스피어 비극의 역사성 : 『리어왕』을 중심으로
한신논문집
1996 .11
-
『왕은 살아있다』: 치유를 향한 긴 여정
Shakespeare Review
2014 .06
-
어머니, 딸들, 그리고 ‘허스토리’ : 여성연극 그룹의 『리어의 딸들』에 나타난 셰익스피어 비극의 페미니스트 각색에 관한 연구
Shakespeare Review
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
셰익스피어 희곡의 영화화에 관한 연구 : 구로사와 아키라의 『거미성』과 『亂』을 중심으로
편장완
영화연구
1998
.12
트랜스내셔널 영화와 번역 : 왜 외팔이가 ‘여기저기서’ 돌아오는가
이영재
아세아연구
2011
.12
구로사와의 『피의 옥좌』 : 셰익스피어의 현지화
신웅재
Shakespeare Review
2010
.03
「黑澤 明(구로사와 아끼라)와 小津安二郞(오즈 야스지로)」 : 그 작품 속에 나타난 사상의 비교연구
이경숙
영화연구
1998
.12
셰익스피어의 확장된 ‘영화적 텍스트’ : 구로사와의 〈거미집의 성〉과 폴란스키의 〈맥베스〉의 비교 분석
조성덕
영화연구
2011
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-002476209