지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper studies buyer's obligations under 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods ("CISG"). Under CISG, as primary obligations, the buyer must pay the price for the goods and take delivery of them as required by the contract and the Convention.
Where a contract does not expressly or implicitly fix or make provision for determining the price, impliedly the buyer is considered to have to pay the price objectively determined. If the price of the goods is expressed in the currency different from that of the place for payment, it seems that the buyer may be entitled to pay in the currency of the place for payment according to the applicable rate of exchange prevailing there when payment is due, provided that the currency is freely convertible.
Regarding the place where the price to be paid, except to the extend otherwise expressly or implicitly agreed between the parties, as a principle for the place of payment under CISG, the buyer must pay the price at the seller's place of business. However if the payment is to be made against the handing over of the goods or of documents, the place should be where the handing over takes place. Regarding the time the price to be paid, except to the extend otherwise expressly or implicitly agreed between the parties, the buyer must pay the price when the seller places either the goods or documents controlling their disposition at the buyer's disposal. The buyer must pay the price at the time when it becomes due without any request or compliance with any formality on the part of the seller.
Looking at the buyer's obligation to take delivery, first, the buyer must do all the acts which could reasonably be expected of him in order to enable the seller to make delivery, and further he must take over the goods delivered by the seller. Where the contract of sale involves carriage of the goods, depending on each situation of individual cases, the first obligation may covers the activities to enter into a contract of carriage and the loading of the goods on board and their storage during carriage or at the destination. The obligation to take over the goods is to take the physical possession of them. This obligation requires the buyer to take over the goods after carriage arranged by the seller as well as the goods that have been placed at the buyer's disposal at the seller's place of business or at another particular place.
Where a contract does not expressly or implicitly fix or make provision for determining the price, impliedly the buyer is considered to have to pay the price objectively determined. If the price of the goods is expressed in the currency different from that of the place for payment, it seems that the buyer may be entitled to pay in the currency of the place for payment according to the applicable rate of exchange prevailing there when payment is due, provided that the currency is freely convertible.
Regarding the place where the price to be paid, except to the extend otherwise expressly or implicitly agreed between the parties, as a principle for the place of payment under CISG, the buyer must pay the price at the seller's place of business. However if the payment is to be made against the handing over of the goods or of documents, the place should be where the handing over takes place. Regarding the time the price to be paid, except to the extend otherwise expressly or implicitly agreed between the parties, the buyer must pay the price when the seller places either the goods or documents controlling their disposition at the buyer's disposal. The buyer must pay the price at the time when it becomes due without any request or compliance with any formality on the part of the seller.
Looking at the buyer's obligation to take delivery, first, the buyer must do all the acts which could reasonably be expected of him in order to enable the seller to make delivery, and further he must take over the goods delivered by the seller. Where the contract of sale involves carriage of the goods, depending on each situation of individual cases, the first obligation may covers the activities to enter into a contract of carriage and the loading of the goods on board and their storage during carriage or at the destination. The obligation to take over the goods is to take the physical possession of them. This obligation requires the buyer to take over the goods after carriage arranged by the seller as well as the goods that have been placed at the buyer's disposal at the seller's place of business or at another particular place.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 대금지급의무
Ⅲ. 물품수령의무
Ⅳ. 결언
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리나라 기업의 CISG 적용사례에 관한 고찰
무역상무연구
2016 .02
-
국제물품매매협약상 매수인의 신용장에 의한 대금지급
무역상무연구
2009 .02
-
국제물품매매에서 매수인의 본질적 계약위반에 관한 최근의 사례 고찰
무역상무연구
2012 .08
-
국제물품매매협약상 위험이전
무역상무연구
2017 .08
-
국제물품매매협약상 매도인의 물품인도의무
무역상무연구
2018 .02
-
CISG상 매수인 구제수단의 요건과 효과에 관한 연구
경영법률
2012 .01
-
외지인은 부동산을 비싸게 매입하는가? : 제주도의 아파트 시장에 대한 실증분석
부동산학연구
2013 .01
-
CISG 제47조, 제66조와 관련된 쟁점
경영법률
2016 .01
-
국제물품매매에서 대금지급장소조항의 적용사례에 관한 고찰
무역상무연구
2010 .05
-
국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약상의 매도인의 하자보완권
관세학회지
2010 .05
-
CISG하에서 물품의 일치성과 제3자 클레임에 관한 법적 기준과 판결례에 관한 고찰
경영법률
2014 .01
-
국제물품매매계약에서 매도인의 서류제공의무에 따른 실무상 유의점 : 선하증권을 중심으로
무역상무연구
2010 .08
-
반사회적 부동산 이중양도의 효력
중앙법학
2016 .12
-
국제물품매매에 있어서 ‘인도’의 범위에 관한 법적 검토
기업법연구
2009 .12
-
CISG하의 매수인의 계약위반 사례에 관한 고찰
무역상무연구
2005 .05
-
국제물품매매계약상의 물품인도 및 서류교부에 관한 매도인의 의무에 관한 연구 : CISG와 Incoterms 2010을 중심으로
무역상무연구
2013 .12
-
賣渡人의 瑕疵擔保責任
비교법학연구
2005 .09
-
특정물매수인의 하자보수청구권
비교사법
2010 .03
-
국제물품매매에서 물품의 계약적합성에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2015 .05
-
CISG 제50조의 대금감액청구권에 관한 연구
무역연구
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
국제물품매매에 있어서 ‘인도’의 범위에 관한 법적 검토
양석완
기업법연구
2009
.12
Incoterms® 2010의 매매당사자 운송계약 및 보험계약 의무 조항에 관한 연구
권오
관세학회지
2011
.08
국제상사계약에 있어 물품의 계약적합성에 기한 담보책임과 그 법적 기준에 관한 고찰 : CISG 제35조의 적용에 따른 판결례를 중심으로
심종석
관세학회지
2007
.02
국제물품매매계약의 이행에 관한 연구 : 국제물품매매계약에 관한 UN협약상 계약당사자의 이행의무규정의 검토와 USNIDROIT원칙 2004와의 비교를 중심으로
오석웅
법학연구
2008
.08
백투백신용장의 비서류적 조건의 법적효력에 관한 연구
이제현
무역학회지
2014
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002881250