지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study concerns the revolt of Wangjo that took place in Lorang Commandery from 25 to 30 A.D. Lorang was a weak commandery established by Emperor Wu of Han Dynasty at the land of Eastern Barbarian. Considering that it was a revolt by a military force which was weak and based on a barbarian region, Wangjo's revolt gives rise to some questions:
1. Was the revolt a nationalistic resistance of the natives?
2. Where did the revolting energy derive from?
3. Why did Wangjo revolt against the newly founded Later Han Dynasty?
4. Why did Emperor Kwangwu choose to quell the revolt of Lorang abroad earlier than the other domestic revolts of China?
This thesis was intended to illuminate these questions and the result is as follows. Wangjo's revolt can hardly be regarded as a nationalistic resistance. For its leader Wangjo, adapted to Chinese political culture and custom, did not have any purpose for independence from China. Moreover, Lorang tombs of the early first century, the period of Wangjo's revolt, abound in things which were produced in, and flowed from China and this disproves the nature of Wangjo's revolt as a nationalistic resistance against the Han race.
The period of the revolt corresponds to that of the shift from Xin Dynasty of Wangmang to Later Han Dynasty and consequently produced a lot of refugees and exiles. Many refugees are supposed to have been from Shandong region considering the incessant popular uprisings and disturbances that occurred there. These refugees contributed to increase the popularity as well as wealth of Lorang. Such inflows of popularity and goods led to the golden age of Lorang, which encouraged Wangjo to revolt.
His revolting act involved the killing of the existing governor and the appropriation of the tide "the Great General, Governor of Lorang." He did not originally rise against the empire of Kwangwu, but in due course he showed himself to be unwilling to yield to the Later Han Dynasty. The main reason resides in Shandong region. The eastern part of China centering around Shandong at that time opposed the Later Han Dynasty situated in the western part. Zhangbu, who belonged to the East, took the reins over Langye(琅邪) and Ji(齊) region which was in intimate relationship to Lorang. Under such circumstances, it was no wonder that Lorang formed an alliance with the East against Emperor Kwangwu, In addition, there were no forces at Liaodong, the North, that were capable of suppressing the revolt of Lorang; rather, Xiongnu, situated north of Liaodong, supported Lorang.
The beginning of year thirty Emperor Kwangw brought the complete suppression of the East and then he dispatched an army to Lorang. The latter can be understood as an extension of the suppression of the East. For, after all, Lorang meant either a supporting force of the East or a potential seat of revolt in the area. The suppression of Lorang gave rebirth to tributes from Eastern Barbarians via that region. Further, the migration of the Lorang residents compelled by Later Han's military expedition provided a momentum for the expansion and spreading of the culture of Lorang into the area south of Lorang commandery since the first century.
1. Was the revolt a nationalistic resistance of the natives?
2. Where did the revolting energy derive from?
3. Why did Wangjo revolt against the newly founded Later Han Dynasty?
4. Why did Emperor Kwangwu choose to quell the revolt of Lorang abroad earlier than the other domestic revolts of China?
This thesis was intended to illuminate these questions and the result is as follows. Wangjo's revolt can hardly be regarded as a nationalistic resistance. For its leader Wangjo, adapted to Chinese political culture and custom, did not have any purpose for independence from China. Moreover, Lorang tombs of the early first century, the period of Wangjo's revolt, abound in things which were produced in, and flowed from China and this disproves the nature of Wangjo's revolt as a nationalistic resistance against the Han race.
The period of the revolt corresponds to that of the shift from Xin Dynasty of Wangmang to Later Han Dynasty and consequently produced a lot of refugees and exiles. Many refugees are supposed to have been from Shandong region considering the incessant popular uprisings and disturbances that occurred there. These refugees contributed to increase the popularity as well as wealth of Lorang. Such inflows of popularity and goods led to the golden age of Lorang, which encouraged Wangjo to revolt.
His revolting act involved the killing of the existing governor and the appropriation of the tide "the Great General, Governor of Lorang." He did not originally rise against the empire of Kwangwu, but in due course he showed himself to be unwilling to yield to the Later Han Dynasty. The main reason resides in Shandong region. The eastern part of China centering around Shandong at that time opposed the Later Han Dynasty situated in the western part. Zhangbu, who belonged to the East, took the reins over Langye(琅邪) and Ji(齊) region which was in intimate relationship to Lorang. Under such circumstances, it was no wonder that Lorang formed an alliance with the East against Emperor Kwangwu, In addition, there were no forces at Liaodong, the North, that were capable of suppressing the revolt of Lorang; rather, Xiongnu, situated north of Liaodong, supported Lorang.
The beginning of year thirty Emperor Kwangw brought the complete suppression of the East and then he dispatched an army to Lorang. The latter can be understood as an extension of the suppression of the East. For, after all, Lorang meant either a supporting force of the East or a potential seat of revolt in the area. The suppression of Lorang gave rebirth to tributes from Eastern Barbarians via that region. Further, the migration of the Lorang residents compelled by Later Han's military expedition provided a momentum for the expansion and spreading of the culture of Lorang into the area south of Lorang commandery since the first century.
목차
Ⅰ. 王調 관련 사료
Ⅱ. 王調 봉기의 배경
Ⅲ. 王調政權의 정체성 문제
Ⅳ. 王調 봉기의 외부적 여건
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
新羅와 樂浪의 關係-新羅史에 보이는 '樂浪'의 實體와 그 歷史的 意味를 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2004 .06
-
‘樂浪史’ 時代區分 試論
한국고대사연구
2009 .03
-
1세기초 廉斯國의 대외교섭
한국고대사연구
2001 .06
-
樂浪 王光墓의 銅鏡
역사와 세계
1999 .06
-
Revolt against Heaven
신학지남
1968 .09
-
1875년의 蔚山鄕變 : 『松史遺稿』를 중심으로
울산사학
2001 .12
-
1728년 湖南 戊申亂의 전개양상과 叛亂軍의 성격
역사와 담론
2011 .12
-
辛亥革命前 四川省에서의 反淸武裝起義
중국사연구
2004 .01
-
중세말 북부프랑스의 도시반란을 통해서 본 유대의 변화와 네트워크
서양중세사연구
2008 .01
-
이승만과 여순사건
역사비평
2009 .02
-
1946년 10월 대구·영남 사건의 명명 작업과 그것의 정치성: 사건·사태, 소요·소동, 민요·민란을 중심으로
대구사학
2019 .01
-
The Samil Revolt Considered as A Mass Movement
Korea Journal
1971 .03
-
조선 후기 고대사 연구와 漢四郡
역사와 담론
2012 .10
-
사 10장 34절과 유대 대반란(The Great Revolt)의 메시아 사상
구약논단
2010 .12
-
1862년 농민항쟁의 새 측면- 居昌 민란 관련 고문서의 소개
古文書硏究
2004 .01
-
古代 嶺西地域의 種族과 文化變遷
한국고대사연구
2008 .09
-
前漢의 정치동향과 琅邪郡 : 侯國의 設置와 徙封을 중심으로
동아인문학
2014 .08
-
後漢時期 邊郡통치의 변화와 樂浪郡 : 王調 반란의 분석을 중심으로
한국사학보
2015 .11
-
중국사에서의 낙랑군
한국고대사연구
2004 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002866798