메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第182輯
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
97 - 122 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is widely said that Korea is similar to Ireland. However, this statement is very vague since the assumed similarities between the two countries have never been specified; specification might lead to an articulation of a Korean national identity. This paper confronts this statement and investigates Yanaihara Tadao's articles on the two countries which have been influential in defining their national identities.
Yanaihara is a prominent Japanese scholar of colonial policies who has written that Korea is "Japan's Ireland." While writing with the aim of learning lessons from Japanese colonial rule, he devoted only one paragraph to the "Irish question" by making an analogy between Irish-British and Korean-Japanese relations. Therefore his analogy is a very limited, and moreover, a forced one, since he makes the historically-false and pro-imperial statement that Korea voluntarily maintained a close economic and military relationship with Japan.
Yanaihara's articles on Korea in the 1920s strongly criticized the repressiveness of the Japanese colonial law and proposed the establishment of a colonial parliament. While his proposal was one of the most liberal, it contained several shortcomings. First, it was unrealistic, considering the weakness of the Japanese parliament itself. Second, he ignored the lesson learned from Irish history that showed that a colonial parliament could not solve colonial discontent.
Here the foundation of Yanaihara's analogy between Korea and Ireland crumbles, since in addition to, or because of, the strain it put on facts regarding the two countries. Therefore it did not lead to a better policy for Korea. When Yanaihara's views are brought up in conjunction with the statement that Korea and Ireland are similar, we must remember that his views are an artifact of the Japanese colonial era.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 야나이하라의 “아일랜드 문제“
Ⅲ. 조선통치론
Ⅳ. 아일랜드ㆍ조선ㆍ한국
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002858350