지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, I analyzed how the 18th century Chinese state viewed and controlled the compilation of local gazetteers and other private local histories. More specifically, I examined the state policy to censor the contents of gazetteers before their publications, and its criticism against the existing practice of local history compilations. Finally, I placed under this politico-cultural context the theories on local gazetteers proposed by Zhang Xuecheng, an eminent historian of the 18th-century, and explained how his theories reflected the ongoing state efforts to centralize culture.
The Qing government under the Qianlong emperor was wary of the gazetteer compilation practice which the state believed reflected the interests of powerful local families and therefore unjustifiably included unworthy members of those families. The government was also highly critical of the "parochialism" that pervaded local gazetteers and private local histories, "parochialism" meaning localist view which often deviated from the official historical perception. As a result, the state tried to impose on the local population orthodox government views of historical figures and events, and at the same time enforced stricter criteria in the selection of deserving figures for the local recording. In other words, the 18th century Chinese state intervened ever more deeply in the cultural practices of local elites.
Zhang Xuehcheng's theories on local gazetteers was a product of this current, as his theories were conditioned by his negative views of local gazetteers that he believed had been relegated to mere tools for elevating the status of local powers. It was no coincidence that he envisioned a greater government role and intervention in the gazetteer compilation process.
The Qing state believed that taming centrifugal local forces, especially the gentry power of the Jiangnan region, was a crucial condition for making the empire stable, and took various measures to restrain their power. The strengthened government control over local gazetteers and private local histories was another aspect of this overarching state agenda necessitated in the process of empire-building.
The Qing government under the Qianlong emperor was wary of the gazetteer compilation practice which the state believed reflected the interests of powerful local families and therefore unjustifiably included unworthy members of those families. The government was also highly critical of the "parochialism" that pervaded local gazetteers and private local histories, "parochialism" meaning localist view which often deviated from the official historical perception. As a result, the state tried to impose on the local population orthodox government views of historical figures and events, and at the same time enforced stricter criteria in the selection of deserving figures for the local recording. In other words, the 18th century Chinese state intervened ever more deeply in the cultural practices of local elites.
Zhang Xuehcheng's theories on local gazetteers was a product of this current, as his theories were conditioned by his negative views of local gazetteers that he believed had been relegated to mere tools for elevating the status of local powers. It was no coincidence that he envisioned a greater government role and intervention in the gazetteer compilation process.
The Qing state believed that taming centrifugal local forces, especially the gentry power of the Jiangnan region, was a crucial condition for making the empire stable, and took various measures to restrain their power. The strengthened government control over local gazetteers and private local histories was another aspect of this overarching state agenda necessitated in the process of empire-building.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 乾隆年間 淸朝의 地方志 編纂 統制策
Ⅲ. 『四庫全書總目提要』속의 地方志 및 地方文獻 비판
Ⅳ. 18世紀의 政治, 文化 環境과 章學誠
Ⅴ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
평양 읍지를 어떻게 읽을 것인가
한국한문학연구
2020 .01
-
국내소장 중국 지방지목록
동아문화
1987 .12
-
김천 읍지 『금릉지』의 편찬과 편찬정신
韓國史學史學報
2014 .01
-
傳統期 韓·中 地方志에 나오는 本貫 기록 비교― 江西省 吉安府 『吉安府志』와 全羅道 南原府 『龍城續誌』를 중심으로
대동문화연구
2013 .01
-
중등학교 향토사 교육의 현황과 과제
지방사와 지방문화
2002 .05
-
지역에서 대안적 활동들
로컬리티 인문학
2010 .10
-
1960년대 박정희 정부의 지역통치체계 재편과 ‘유지집단’의 활동 : 충청북도 괴산군 증평읍 사례를 중심으로
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
The New Perspective for Korean Local Government
Korea Journal
1999 .06
-
숙종대의 『여지승람』 수정증보 사업과 그 의미
동방학지
2019 .01
-
초등학교 향토사교육의 실제와 지향점
역사교육
2003 .09
-
중국 지방정부의 재정위기(Financial Crisis) 유발행위의 분석
동아인문학
2016 .12
-
中國史에서의 중앙과 지방
역사학보
2006 .12
-
지역축제 발전을 위한 지역사회와 지역대학의 역할
비교민속학
2001 .02
-
임란 이후 순천지역 사족의 변화와 승평지 편찬
대구사학
2016 .01
-
明淸時代 地域史硏究의 새로운 패러다임에 대한 摸索
중국사연구
2008 .01
-
高麗初期 在地官班의 정치적 위상과 지방사회 운영
한국사연구
2002 .03
-
지역방송사 통합에 대한 지역민의 수용태도에 관한 연구
주관성 연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002846732