메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
전문잡지
저자정보
김애영 (한신대학교)
저널정보
한신대학교 한신신학연구소 신학연구 神學硏究 第55輯
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
127 - 162 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article has tackled and clarified the themes of ‘Culture of Life’ and ‘Gender Equality’ issues and their interrelatedness. The Themes are much discussed and spread among people today, yet need to be further conceptually clarified and remodeled.
This article has shown how the themes have arisen and have been discussed in their Western contexts, and also discussed in Korea up to present time. The concepts of ‘Culture of Life’ or ‘Theology of Life’ remains ambiguous, as is criticised in general. Yet the themes are vitally related to environment movement, ecology, ecotheology, ecofeminist theology, since ‘Culture of Life’ movement today is vitally related to our life and concern for environmental or ecological issues. My main purpose in this article is to explore how ‘Culture of Life’ movement and ‘Gender Equality’ is to be correlated, for the sake of a further development of feminist theology. Having shown how the theme of ‘Culture of Life’ or ‘Theology of Life’ arose in Western historical contexts and its motives, I have discussed on the impact of ‘Culture of Life’ movement upon church and theology in Korea.
Also this article has tackled critically the ambiguity, conceptual and in relation to the capitalist world society today which has been devastating our ecological system and sustaining gender inequality. however Gender Equality movement and discourses in Korea are also ambiguous and need to be critically reviewed and clarified. And I have pointed out the general tendency of accepting and using the problematic concepts or terms and strategies of ‘gender mainstreaming’ and ‘affirmative action’. These streams are exposed to the criticism that feminist movement and theology would be a means for some middle class women to enter some privileged middle class men’s status. In spite of this critical problem, Gender Equality movement and policies have contributed much for women to obtain legal opportunity in their political and social status, though on the whole their gender equality need to be further promoted in social status.
Feminists and feminist theologians have been much struggling in face of male dominating societies, and against capitalist abusing of nature and devastating life environment, against male dominating political-economic world structures. Their peace movements against world military structures and nuclear threats. Those struggles of Feminist movement are nothing else than ‘Culture of Life’ movement. Those two factors need to be correlated, by the way of clarifying conceptually and in terms of policies.
This article has indicated the general limitations of ‘Culture of Life’ and ‘Gender Equality’ movements, both of which tend to remain within the male dominating capitalist world structures, for the sake of their continuing advancements of strategies toward better human life and egalitarian world community.

목차

Ⅰ. 시작하는 말
Ⅱ. “생명문화”에 관하여
Ⅲ. “양성평등”에 관하여
Ⅳ. 마치는 말
참고 문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-230-002844932