지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Why did the framers adopt the Constitution instead of the existing Articles of Confederation in 1787? Many historians and political scientists conclude that both the defects of the Articles of Confederation and the vices of the state politics during the 1780s led the framers to consider an alternative. Especially historian Gordon S. Wood insists that the latter was the principal reason because the framers such as James Madison were disenchanted with the abuse of power by the state legislatures.
This essay, however, is an attempt to consider the making of the Constitution and the Union to be an experiment in international system of cooperation on a continent divided into 13 states. The Federalist papers indicate that the Federalists' determination to establish a united national government was resulted primarily from their concerns with the dangers from foreign force and secondarily from concerns with the dangers from war between the 13 states. By 1787 the Federalists discerned that the failures of the Union created a full-blown crisis of the American Revolution. They believed that the tendency of American politics was toward disunion, and that the anarchy of disunion would soon lead to tyranny and counterrevolution. The imminent collapse of the Union would multiply potential dangers by exposing each state to the rivalry of other American as well as European states. A strong Union was the only guarantee of American independence.
In 1787 two extremes, before the Federalists, were a perfect separation and a perfect incorporation of the 13 states. The Federalists rejected both extremes, in favor of a "middle ground". They chose this "middle ground" because they believed that both the dissolution of the Union and the consolidation of the Union would be a betrayal of the Revolution. Both the anarchy and the empire were the threatening factors to the republic, what the founding fathers considered as the ideal type of nation system.
This essay, however, is an attempt to consider the making of the Constitution and the Union to be an experiment in international system of cooperation on a continent divided into 13 states. The Federalist papers indicate that the Federalists' determination to establish a united national government was resulted primarily from their concerns with the dangers from foreign force and secondarily from concerns with the dangers from war between the 13 states. By 1787 the Federalists discerned that the failures of the Union created a full-blown crisis of the American Revolution. They believed that the tendency of American politics was toward disunion, and that the anarchy of disunion would soon lead to tyranny and counterrevolution. The imminent collapse of the Union would multiply potential dangers by exposing each state to the rivalry of other American as well as European states. A strong Union was the only guarantee of American independence.
In 1787 two extremes, before the Federalists, were a perfect separation and a perfect incorporation of the 13 states. The Federalists rejected both extremes, in favor of a "middle ground". They chose this "middle ground" because they believed that both the dissolution of the Union and the consolidation of the Union would be a betrayal of the Revolution. Both the anarchy and the empire were the threatening factors to the republic, what the founding fathers considered as the ideal type of nation system.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (58)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이보형 / 1998 / 아메리카혁명은 어떠한 혁명인가 / 미국사연구 8 : 4 ~
2. [단행본] - Joseph J. Ellis / 2007 / American Creation / Alfred A. Knopf : 9 ~
3. [단행본] - Alan Brinkley / 2004 / The Unfinished Nation / McGraw-Hill Companies
4. [단행본] - Richard B. Morris / 1987 / The Forging of the Union / Harper & Row, Publishers : 90 ~ 91
5. [단행본] - Gordon S. Wood / 2006 / Revolutionary Characters: What Made the Founders Different / The Penguin Press : 146 ~
2. [단행본] - Joseph J. Ellis / 2007 / American Creation / Alfred A. Knopf : 9 ~
3. [단행본] - Alan Brinkley / 2004 / The Unfinished Nation / McGraw-Hill Companies
4. [단행본] - Richard B. Morris / 1987 / The Forging of the Union / Harper & Row, Publishers : 90 ~ 91
5. [단행본] - Gordon S. Wood / 2006 / Revolutionary Characters: What Made the Founders Different / The Penguin Press : 146 ~
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
독일연방공화국의 임금운동 : 1950년대를 중심으로
경주사학
2000 .12
-
헌법은, 우리에게 무엇인가? : 헌법의 의의, 헌법의 정신
황해문화
2004 .12
-
국민주권성과 통일헌법
철학
2016 .11
-
바이마르 공화국 헌법
역사와실학
1999 .01
-
미국헌법 비준논쟁 연구 : 버지니아 비준회의를 중심으로
역사교육
2002 .03
-
민주공화주의와 대한민국 헌법 이념의 형성
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2007 .03
-
헌법이 두 가지인 나라
철학과 현실
1995 .12
-
제1공화국 시대의 한국 교회 : 정부 당국과의 관계를 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2006 .04
-
독일연방공화국 노조운동의 추이 : 60년대 말부터 70년대 초까지
경주사학
2001 .12
-
헌법과 국민의 권능
철학연구
2012 .12
-
극동공화국 건설에 나타난 소련의 동아시아정책의 한 단면
대동문화연구
2005 .01
-
헌법 개정을 앞두고
역사비평
2017 .08
-
소비에트 연방은 왜 해체되었는가? : 소련의 “이중 체제”와 “민족 창조 정책”을 통해서 본 소련 해체 문제의 재고
역사학보
2011 .06
-
제헌헌법에 나타난 민주공화국 프로젝트의 모습
내일을 여는 역사
2013 .06
-
第1共和國 初期(1948~1950)의 經濟政策 硏究
한국사연구
1999 .09
-
민주공화국의 입헌정치에 있어서 헌법교육/민주시민교육 : 그 특정한 위상의 규명과 추진 방안의 제안
사회와 철학
2017 .10
-
바이마르 공화국 시대 기독교 노조의 국가에 대한 태도 및 이념의 심화 과정
경주사학
1994 .12
-
스탈린 체제의 등장과 소련 노동조합의 재편, 1928~31
역사학보
2009 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002971694