지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article examines how the US global & security strategies have changed in the post-Cold War era. The ultimate goal of US’s statecraft, the expansion of freedom, democracy and human dignity, is nonnegotiable. To protect their Nation and values, The United States seeks to extend freedom across the globe by leading an international effort to end tyranny and to promote effective democracy. Americans believe that all tyrannies threaten the world peace, and some tyrannies, in their pursuit of WMD or sponsorship of terrorism, threaten their immediate security interests as well. From the American perspective, North Korea is the typical tyranny and WMD related country.
The North Korean nuclear test on October 9, 2006 is inevitable evidence of WMD development. For that reason, US wants regime change or regime transformation of North Korea. In fact US has various policy options toward North Korea. Firstly, there are several international regime against WMD proliferation, for example Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, Missile Technology Control Regime, Wassenaar Arrangement, Nuclear Suppliers Group and Australia Group ets. Secondly United States itself has retained many regulation acts to restrict trade with North Korea. US policymakers have prepared ‘tailored containment’ against North Korea thorough all kinds of tools above.
After the North Korean nuclear test, optimism is harder to maintain. It is crucial to see the big picture and take the long view.
The North Korean nuclear test on October 9, 2006 is inevitable evidence of WMD development. For that reason, US wants regime change or regime transformation of North Korea. In fact US has various policy options toward North Korea. Firstly, there are several international regime against WMD proliferation, for example Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, Missile Technology Control Regime, Wassenaar Arrangement, Nuclear Suppliers Group and Australia Group ets. Secondly United States itself has retained many regulation acts to restrict trade with North Korea. US policymakers have prepared ‘tailored containment’ against North Korea thorough all kinds of tools above.
After the North Korean nuclear test, optimism is harder to maintain. It is crucial to see the big picture and take the long view.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 미국의 세계전략 변화
Ⅲ. 미국의 대북전략 변화
Ⅳ. 북한의 핵실험과 미국의 선택
Ⅴ. 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
북핵문제와 한국의 대응 : 북핵 확산을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2016 .06
-
North Korea: A ‘Dwarf’ WMD State
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2006 .01
-
Weapons of Mass Destruction: The North Korean Threat
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2004 .01
-
부시행정부의 북핵전략과 선택
세계지역연구논총
2004 .12
-
북한 핵개발과 미국 : 북한의 생존전략과 미국의 세계전략을 중심으로
21세기정치학회보
2003 .12
-
북한의 2차 핵실험과 핵개발 의도
한국동북아논총
2010 .06
-
제2의 북한 핵 위기: 합의냐 파국이냐
국제관계연구
2003 .09
-
북한사회의 변화 전망과 대북 정책의 방향
경기연구원 기본연구
2009 .11
-
제4차 6자회담의 의미와 한국의 정책방향
국제관계연구
2005 .09
-
Changing Nuclear Capabilities and Strategy between the United States and North Korea
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
The North Korean Nuclear Program and External Connections
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2004 .01
-
Toward a Governance System and Political Understanding to Permit a Verified Nuclear-free Korean Peninsula: Policy Developments and Operational Challenges
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2014 .01
-
Time to Balance Deterrence, Offense, and Defense? Rethinking South Korea’s Strategy against the North Korean Nuclear Threat
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-000-003245622