메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
안창남 (강남대학교) 오광태 (국세청)
저널정보
한국국제조세협회 조세학술논집 租稅學術論集 第26輯 第1號
발행연도
2010.2
수록면
277 - 310 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In June 2008, the OECD published a final report (OECD Report) on the attribution of profits to permanent establishments (PEs) after discussions for almost ten years. The background for the OECD Report was that there had been considerable variations in the domestic laws and practices of the member countries regarding the taxation of PEs, and had not been a consensus among the member countries as to the correct interpretation of Article 7 (business profits) of the OECD Model Tax Convention which provides the method of taxation of PEs.
The lack of a common interpretation of Article 7 can easily lead to the problem of international double taxation and non-taxation. In Korea, the same situation has long been occurred. Especially, there have been considerably different views between tax authorities and taxpayers on the taxation of the dependent agent PEs. This could originally be attributed to the lack of common and clear guidance for the taxation of PEs including dependent agent PEs in the tax treaties and domestic laws.
In August, 1995, the National Tax Service issued an internal guidance designed to avoid tax conflicts with taxpayers for the taxation of the dependent agent PEs in which tax auditors were strongly recommended not to determine whether a foreign entity has a dependent agent but to determine whether the remuneration received from the foreign entity for the activity of a dependent agent is at arm’s length. However, as the guidance has inherent flaws regarding the status of legal power and so on, the taxation issues on the dependent agent PEs have continuously been emerged since then.
In this regard, this study, first of all, examined the domestic laws and practices for the taxation of the dependent agent PEs in our country, and studied the differences between them and the OECD Reports. Then, this study reviewed the OECD Report through examples, and proposed the direction of the revision of relevant tax provisions on the basis of the OECD Reports.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 우리나라 간주고정사업장 과세유형 분석
Ⅲ. OECD 최종보고서에서 제안된 과세방법 및 사례
Ⅳ. OECD 과세원칙이 국내세법에 주는 시사점 및 개정방향
Ⅴ. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (2)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-329-003380362