지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This Study will be designed to established the legal policy of restriction and distributional justice of Genetic Technology. It is motivated by the rapid development of Biotechnology and its area human cloning and embryo stemcell research, genetic testing, gene therapy, xenon-transplantation.
As genetic technology and other technologies relevant to human biology are developed, society will faced a host of complex ethical, legal, and social issues. One of the most complex sets of issues involves our choices over who will access to these technologies. Given the benefits that people will obtain from genetic technologies, people will not be able to satisfy their demand. Society has encountered shortages of supply of medical services in the past. Resent now certain conditions must be satisfied in order for someone to gain access to genetic technologies. Special social status motived people to pursue these genetic technologies of procreation. But the lower social classes did not have children in this fashion. More likely, it was because they could not afford to.
There is a great concern that the mischiefs of genetic technology may outstrip its benefits. In addition, another question has been raised who should benefit from the development of genetic technology. Problems of distributional justice arise under the condition of scarce resources. Whether achievements of genetic research should be distributed according to need or ability-to-pay needs to be answered.
The aim of the social survey is to investigate the perception of Korean citizens and scientist on genetic technology and distributional justice, specifically focusing on application and limit of genetic test and screening, gene therapy and genetic enhancement.
This survey was carried out using telephone interview from April 20th to May 20th in 2004. A total of 1,004 citizens, 432 scientists were randomly sampled. The questionnaire consisted of 16 questions about overall impact of genetic technology, application of genetic test, potential for discrimination on the basis of genetic information, permissibility of and intent to use gene therapy, access to genetic technology, and so on.
The major findings of this survey were as follows. First, 71.0% of the respondents perceived that the development of genetic technology would ensure healthier life whereas 17.8% were worried about its adverse effects. Second, 93.7% were concerned about social discrimination based on genetic information. Third, 69.5% agreed that profit-seeking should be restricted in bio-industry using genetic technology. Forth, 73.5% perceived that a cost-sharing scheme between patients and the government was required to ensure patients' access to genetic technology, and 21.9% claimed that the government should pay the costs. Fifth, 82.6% anticipated the advent of genetic class whereby citizens would be ranked based on genetic difference.
As genetic technology and other technologies relevant to human biology are developed, society will faced a host of complex ethical, legal, and social issues. One of the most complex sets of issues involves our choices over who will access to these technologies. Given the benefits that people will obtain from genetic technologies, people will not be able to satisfy their demand. Society has encountered shortages of supply of medical services in the past. Resent now certain conditions must be satisfied in order for someone to gain access to genetic technologies. Special social status motived people to pursue these genetic technologies of procreation. But the lower social classes did not have children in this fashion. More likely, it was because they could not afford to.
There is a great concern that the mischiefs of genetic technology may outstrip its benefits. In addition, another question has been raised who should benefit from the development of genetic technology. Problems of distributional justice arise under the condition of scarce resources. Whether achievements of genetic research should be distributed according to need or ability-to-pay needs to be answered.
The aim of the social survey is to investigate the perception of Korean citizens and scientist on genetic technology and distributional justice, specifically focusing on application and limit of genetic test and screening, gene therapy and genetic enhancement.
This survey was carried out using telephone interview from April 20th to May 20th in 2004. A total of 1,004 citizens, 432 scientists were randomly sampled. The questionnaire consisted of 16 questions about overall impact of genetic technology, application of genetic test, potential for discrimination on the basis of genetic information, permissibility of and intent to use gene therapy, access to genetic technology, and so on.
The major findings of this survey were as follows. First, 71.0% of the respondents perceived that the development of genetic technology would ensure healthier life whereas 17.8% were worried about its adverse effects. Second, 93.7% were concerned about social discrimination based on genetic information. Third, 69.5% agreed that profit-seeking should be restricted in bio-industry using genetic technology. Forth, 73.5% perceived that a cost-sharing scheme between patients and the government was required to ensure patients' access to genetic technology, and 21.9% claimed that the government should pay the costs. Fifth, 82.6% anticipated the advent of genetic class whereby citizens would be ranked based on genetic difference.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 생명공학연구 성과의 공급부족(shortage)을 야기하는 요인
Ⅲ. 생명공학성과의 분배정의 기준에 관한 논의
Ⅳ. 분배정의의 문제해결을 위한 구체적인 제안
Ⅴ. 생명공학자원의 분배와 관련된 사회적 인식도 조사
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
분산 유전알고리즘의 TSP 적용
대한안전경영과학회지
2001 .01
-
인간 유전정보 보호와 시민참여
과학기술학연구
2003 .06
-
Genetic Substitution System
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2016 .12
-
유전상담사 자격인증 제도와 국내 석사학위 과정의 의료윤리 교육
생명윤리
2020 .06
-
유전정보에 대한 윤리적 쟁점의 변천
생명윤리
2014 .06
-
인간 유전체 기능 연구의 법적 문제
생명윤리
2002 .05
-
'생명윤리및안전에관한법률'의 분석
생명윤리
2004 .06
-
생명과학기술의 또 다른 그늘 : 유전자차별
과학기술학연구
2014 .06
-
유전공학 발전의 근거 비판 : 세계관과 가치관을 중심으로
생명윤리
2002 .12
-
효율적인 유전알고리듬을 이용하여 양면.혼합모델 작업라인 균형에 대한 연구
대한안전경영과학회 학술대회
2002 .01
-
유전알고리듬을 이용한 양면.혼합모델 조립라인 밸런싱
대한안전경영과학회지
2002 .01
-
Genetic Renaturation
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2017 .08
-
유전자 알고리듬을 적용한 도시공간 디자인 최적화에 관한 연구
한국HCI학회 학술대회
2010 .01
-
A Search Method for Route Planning Task with Multiple Goals Based on Genetic Algorithm
한국콘텐츠학회 ICCC 논문집
2014 .06
-
An Energy Awareness Congestion Control Scheme based on Genetic Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks
한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집
2010 .12
-
인간 배아 및 생식계열의 유전적 변형(human Embryo and Germ-line genetic modification) 행위에 대한 용어 정의의 필요성과 그 용어의 조건
생명윤리
2020 .06
-
신경망과 유전자 알고리즘을 이용한 영상식별
한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집
2010 .05
-
An Energy Awareness Congestion Control Scheme based on Genetic Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks
한국콘텐츠학회 ICCC 논문집
2010 .12
-
Technology Changes People
한국콘텐츠학회 ICCC 논문집
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-570-002561344