메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제22권 제3호
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
143 - 165 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
David Hare’s A Map of the World(1982) concerns international politics and artistic representation, changing the setting in the play from a domestic one to foreign India. For the play Hare takes advantage of Brecht’s principle of estrangement and the deconstructive approach to the subject matter for the audience/reader’s judgement. The consequence of his attempts is problematic because to form a judgement itself from a certain perspective turns out to be an aporia in the play and for the audience. And the excessive adoption of the Brechtian principle and diffusion with an aporia rather seem to function as an obstacle to his sustaining the balance between politics and theatricality. Only the title of the play seems to help the audience/reader discern his dream of politics and art.
In the play there intersect various and irreconcilable perspectives which incite the audience/reader’s curiosity and resist the endorsement of a certain perspective. Like the continents on the map of the world, they are major concerns in the play: the conflict between writing and journalism, the opposing attitudes between the right and left wings in younger and older generations, the collision between orientalism and national identity, and art and representation. And all the conflicts among the perspectives result in the conflict between truth and lies, or pureness and a compound. Eventually, self-deception and compromise can function as a possible alternative for the truth or pureness in reality.
Hare’s choice of the title for his play from Wilde’s coinage reflects the implication of a paradoxical dilemma of the ideal and of an undaunted experimental spirit of an artist. The play seems to suggest that despite the dilemma, what matters is the writer’s and audience/reader’s will for social change. The title tacitly insinuates that the play dreams of an unattainable Utopia for politics and theatricality.

목차

Ⅰ. Presenting a Map of Different Opinions
Ⅱ. Playing with the Principle of Estrangement
Ⅲ. Reconciling the Ideal with Fiction
Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-842-001929696