지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Children’s plays of India, Nepal and Korea were classified into five categories for comparison. The categories included the case in which plays and play sites are almost similar to each other, the case in which plays are similar but play sites are a little different, the case in which plays are a little different but plays sites are similar, the case in which both plays and play sites are different, and the case in which play materials are a little different but plays and play sites are similar. But no actual examples could be found for the fourth case. The examination of these aspects indicates that there exists no big difference in the context of making children’s plays in India and Korea and that there exists universality in children’s plays of India and Korea.
As shown in the five cases aforementioned, there are a little differences in plays and plays sites of India, Nepal and Korea, and the question here is what makes such differences. Besides, it is difficult to say that the boundaries between the five cases are very strict. It needs to be understood in a relative sense. The five categories are a tool needed to examine children’s plays of India and Korea in three dimensions. In this sense, they represent a kind of a manipulated classification framework designed to help us take another look at Korean children’s plays which we have regarded as familiar from a transcendental perspective.
What makes the differences and similarities found in the five cases in the above? First, considering that a great majority of plays employ similar play sites, we can find that there exist universal characteristics in children’s plays that go beyond country boundaries. On the contrary, the case in which plays are similar but play sites are a little different and the case in which plays are a little different but play sites are similar indicate that children’s plays of Korea and India have their own characteristics as well.
Like the first case, the fact that there is no case in which plays and play sites are quite different once again tells us that children’s plays of India and Korea have strong universal characteristics. Finally, the case in which play materials are a little different but plays and play sites are similar also represents an example which strengthens the universality between children’s plays of India and Korea.
In conclusion, children’s plays of India and Korea are very similar to each other and this can be attributed to the universal nature of children’s plays which cannot but be faithful to the play nature of children.
As shown in the five cases aforementioned, there are a little differences in plays and plays sites of India, Nepal and Korea, and the question here is what makes such differences. Besides, it is difficult to say that the boundaries between the five cases are very strict. It needs to be understood in a relative sense. The five categories are a tool needed to examine children’s plays of India and Korea in three dimensions. In this sense, they represent a kind of a manipulated classification framework designed to help us take another look at Korean children’s plays which we have regarded as familiar from a transcendental perspective.
What makes the differences and similarities found in the five cases in the above? First, considering that a great majority of plays employ similar play sites, we can find that there exist universal characteristics in children’s plays that go beyond country boundaries. On the contrary, the case in which plays are similar but play sites are a little different and the case in which plays are a little different but play sites are similar indicate that children’s plays of Korea and India have their own characteristics as well.
Like the first case, the fact that there is no case in which plays and play sites are quite different once again tells us that children’s plays of India and Korea have strong universal characteristics. Finally, the case in which play materials are a little different but plays and play sites are similar also represents an example which strengthens the universality between children’s plays of India and Korea.
In conclusion, children’s plays of India and Korea are very similar to each other and this can be attributed to the universal nature of children’s plays which cannot but be faithful to the play nature of children.
목차
Ⅰ. 어린이 놀이 비교연구의 흐름
Ⅱ. 현장에서 본 인도 및 네팔 어린이 놀이의 전승 실태
Ⅲ. 인도 및 네팔과 한국 어린이 놀이판의 같고 다른 양상
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
아이들 놀이로 살펴본 남녀 성역할의 분별과 까닭
실천민속학연구
2005 .06
-
유아 다문화이해교육의 가능성 탐색 - 놀이를 활용한 중국어 학습중심으로 -
다문화와 평화
2011 .01
-
놀이에 대한 위니캇의 심리학적 이해와 몰트만의 신학적 이해의 상관성 연구
신학논단
2020 .09
-
Playing on the Green
인간연구
2016 .07
-
놀이와 상상력, 시작(詩作)의 상관 관계 : 김수영 시 「달나라의 장난」을 바라보는 새로운 시각
어문학
2006 .12
-
중국 현대극의 서구 연극 사조 수용양상－ 曹？의 작품을 중심으로
중국어문학
2004 .01
-
한국연극계의 영미희곡 수용에 관한 연구 : 80-97년 서울 공연을 중심으로
현대영미드라마
1999 .04
-
새 발굴 가사집 『춘경가(春景歌)』 작품 세계 연구
국문학연구
2019 .01
-
韓ㆍ日 아동놀이의 비교
한국민속학
1990 .09
-
마을 공동체문화로서 민속놀이의 전승과 기능
한국민속학
2008 .11
-
멜라니 클라인의 대상관계이론 관점에서 본 놀이치료 임상사례 연구
목회와 상담
2015 .01
-
놀이로서 세상보기
인문논총
2007 .01
-
1910년대 근대적 배우 개념의 형성 과정 연구
어문학
2004 .12
-
Something Cloudy, Something Clear, 실험적 회상극
현대영미드라마
2012 .04
-
한국의 전통놀이에 대한 심리치료적 이해
경주사학
2011 .12
-
장애영유아의 놀이와 관련된 교사의 경험과 역할에 대한 질적 메타분석
생애학회지
2020 .01
-
놀이의 기독교교육적 의미에 관한 한 성찰
신학과 목회
2008 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
아파트 단지내 어린이 놀이터의 환경적 위상 정립에 관한 연구
오경진
,
김형언
KIEAE Journal
2014
.06
창의성 증진을 위한 국내놀이터 공간특성 및 개선방안 연구
윤여란
,
문정민
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2016
.08
사례 분석을 통한 생태 놀이터의 계획 특성 연구
김자경
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2016
.04
어린이 실외놀이 지원을 위한 놀이터 안전관리
이완정
한국생활과학회 학술대회논문집
2014
.11
실외놀이터 환경과 아동의 놀이행동에 관한 사례연구 : 서울지역 어린이집을 중심으로
최목화
,
변혜령
한국주거학회논문집
2007
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-015981911