메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第112輯
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
93 - 131 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Eastern Asia was a unique area where human migration did not take place in particular before the modern age. Especially in the case of Korea and Japan, long-term residence were not permitted for a long time since the Korean and Japanese showed sensitive reactions to the introduction of foreign culture.
But after the opening of ports, they were compelled to accept not only the western civilization and the circumference culture but also their economic permeations. In particular, the Koreans had to accept the immigrations of foreigners and emigrations to the other countries such as Imperial Japan as their country had lost his sovereignty.
Therefore, they had to accept the immigration of overseas Chinese laborers which brought the Korean labor market to a crisis. The so-called ‘Wanpaoshan(萬寶山) Incident’ in 1931 developed this crisis into national conflicts between the Koreans and Chinese accelerated by the conspiracy of Imperial Japan.
The inner world of nationalist intellectuals in Korea who observed this situation was various and complicated. An Jae-Hong(安在鴻), the president of Choseonilbo(朝鮮日報), thought that the co-operation between the domestic Korean laborers and the Korean peasants in Manchuria was essential to solve this problem and emphasized the weak Koreans’ right to live. Yoon Chi-Ho(尹致昊) thought the so-called Manchurian invasion of Imperial Japan was essential to protect the lives of Korean peasants and promote penetration of Korean Capitalists in Manchuria. Kim Dong-In(金東仁) wrote a novel which justified the Manchurian invasion of Imperial Japan under the pretext of naive nationalism.
In short, we found that the desire and demand of Imperial Japan and Japanese capitalist promoted conflicts between Korean and Chinese, and recognized that each intellectual had different and complicated inner world according to their ideological base and interests.

목차

1. 序言
2. 한국인 대중의 華僑 認識과 중국인 노동자의 급증
3. ‘萬寶山 事件’ 전후 민족주의 계열 지식인의 내면세계
4. 結語

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-374-001676453