지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to examine the properties of Old Russian clitics and to compare them to those of other Slavic languages, especially South Slavic languages. Slavic clitics may be either clause-second or verb-adjacent. Serbo-Croatian and Slovene belong to the first group, which are often referred to as having Wackernagel-position clitics, while Macedonian and Bulgarian belong to the second category.
Old Russian texts show an interesting aspect with respect to clitic position; 14th century Old Russian text, Povest' vremmenyx let (The Primary Chronicle), reveals that early Old Russian most closely resembles Serbo-Croation and Slovene among the South Slavic language(s), i.e.. second-position clitic languages.
However, later Old Russian texts, by the 17th century when short-form pronominal clitics gradually disappeared. show a different aspect in terms of clitic position: they could be placed in 2nd position. as Wackernagel s law suggests, or they could be found after verbs, not necessarily in 2nd position. The interesting thing is that most 2nd position clitics in these texts are verb-adjacent at the same time. It suggests that the language moves toward an ad-verbal type, as we see in Macedonian and Bulgarian.
The data are very complicated, and yet since any historical text reflects a snapshot of a particular moment in linguistic and cultural history, we may mention two important factors that undoubtedly influence the state of these texts: 1) during the process of diachronic language change. there arises a stage when both systems coexist on some basis and these texts may represent just such an intermediate state; and 2) the philological-literary traditions of Old Russian generally cause texts to be conservative with respect to on-going diachronic changes. Writers and scribers are familiar with the tradition of writing clitics in 2nd position. The violations of this tradition due to genuine language change are thereby partially suppressed.
Old Russian texts show an interesting aspect with respect to clitic position; 14th century Old Russian text, Povest' vremmenyx let (The Primary Chronicle), reveals that early Old Russian most closely resembles Serbo-Croation and Slovene among the South Slavic language(s), i.e.. second-position clitic languages.
However, later Old Russian texts, by the 17th century when short-form pronominal clitics gradually disappeared. show a different aspect in terms of clitic position: they could be placed in 2nd position. as Wackernagel s law suggests, or they could be found after verbs, not necessarily in 2nd position. The interesting thing is that most 2nd position clitics in these texts are verb-adjacent at the same time. It suggests that the language moves toward an ad-verbal type, as we see in Macedonian and Bulgarian.
The data are very complicated, and yet since any historical text reflects a snapshot of a particular moment in linguistic and cultural history, we may mention two important factors that undoubtedly influence the state of these texts: 1) during the process of diachronic language change. there arises a stage when both systems coexist on some basis and these texts may represent just such an intermediate state; and 2) the philological-literary traditions of Old Russian generally cause texts to be conservative with respect to on-going diachronic changes. Writers and scribers are familiar with the tradition of writing clitics in 2nd position. The violations of this tradition due to genuine language change are thereby partially suppressed.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 남부슬라브어 접어의 특성
Ⅲ. 고대러시아어
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
스페인어 접어뭉치의 통사적 분석
스페인어문학
2018 .01
-
접어의 형성
언어학 연구
2017 .04
-
스페인어 목적대명사 교육에 대한 제언
언어과학연구
2019 .09
-
어순대응공리에 입각한 클리틱 대명사의 두 가지 위치에 대한 분석
스페인어문학
2014 .01
-
체코어 접어(Clitics)의 어순 제약
동유럽발칸연구
2003 .01
-
The Old Russian Copula byti "be" and the Auxiliary byti "be": One Lexeme or Two?
언어과학연구
2006 .03
-
접어군 설정
언어학 연구
1998 .10
-
CLITIC ORDERING VS. PRO-DROP IN OLD RUSSIAN : AN OPTIMALITY THEORY APPROACH TO THE RESOLUTION OF A GRAMMATICAL CONFLICT
언어학
2004 .08
-
스페인어 대격 접어(accusative clitic) 구문: 선택적 자질 계승(optional feature inheritance) 분석
스페인어문학
2014 .01
-
On the Status of Subject Markers in African Languages
언어학 연구
2017 .07
-
스페인어 접어인상구문의 의미 -통사적 분석
스페인어문학
2017 .01
-
스페인어 심리동사 구문의 접어에 관한 연구
언어과학연구
2012 .09
-
접어의 형태통사적 특성
신영어영문학
1998 .02
-
To be and to have in Slavic languages
한국노어노문학회 학술대회 발표집
2015 .10
-
형식 품사의 형태·통어론적 지위에 관한 연구-접어(clitic)로 분석하다-
한글
2001 .06
-
접어와 기능어 : 형태론적 단위와 통사론적 단위
한국어학
2008 .02
-
슬라브어의 시간 - 시간 어휘 속에 반영된 슬라브인의 세계관 -
슬라브硏究
2009 .01
-
국어 문법 단위와 접어 설정에 관해서
코기토
2018 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-309-018906777