지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Yoo-seungwon critically investigated and pointed out methodological problems of existing studies by using 《Study on status system of early Chosun Dynasty》
He found the characteristic of status through the gap between different hierarchies and established the criteria for classification detection based on this theory.
He said, “A status is a class that indicates the legislated grade of a group, and a class simultaneously having the legislated grade transmit from generation to generation by regulation." He applied his statement to the phenomenon of early Chosun dynasty and tried to explore the characteristic of the status structure.
Also, he analyzed the basic structure of the early chosun dynasty by consistently putting the standard detection of class at? hereditary legislated difference, namely, in the form of right. In the process, he presented a general idea of status, and applied it to the analysis of status system in early 'Chosun dynasty', and established what is called 'yangchunjae theoryl'.
His 《Study on status system of early chosun dynasty》 is the (1)comprehensive of all of the previous studies, and (2)is not only academically meaningful by the fact that it reorganizes prior debate on "yangchunjae theory" but also (3)is significant from historical science point of view since it tries to establish the theory while exploring diverse methodological approach. His 'yangchunjae theory' got major support as various attempts to examine the concept of early chosun dynasty's status system and characteristic of status system structure.
Also, it was often criticized for being a very insufficient frame in elucidating the diverse condition of status in early Chosun dynasty. There was an attempt that paid attention to the point that each category of class is qualitatively varied (as being) divided the category of class and presented a general view of the structure.
However, now the debate on the idea of status or the status system came to a state of lull. In order to understand Early Chosun dynasty's and Chosun dynasty's status system, the study should be done more passively once more again.
He found the characteristic of status through the gap between different hierarchies and established the criteria for classification detection based on this theory.
He said, “A status is a class that indicates the legislated grade of a group, and a class simultaneously having the legislated grade transmit from generation to generation by regulation." He applied his statement to the phenomenon of early Chosun dynasty and tried to explore the characteristic of the status structure.
Also, he analyzed the basic structure of the early chosun dynasty by consistently putting the standard detection of class at? hereditary legislated difference, namely, in the form of right. In the process, he presented a general idea of status, and applied it to the analysis of status system in early 'Chosun dynasty', and established what is called 'yangchunjae theoryl'.
His 《Study on status system of early chosun dynasty》 is the (1)comprehensive of all of the previous studies, and (2)is not only academically meaningful by the fact that it reorganizes prior debate on "yangchunjae theory" but also (3)is significant from historical science point of view since it tries to establish the theory while exploring diverse methodological approach. His 'yangchunjae theory' got major support as various attempts to examine the concept of early chosun dynasty's status system and characteristic of status system structure.
Also, it was often criticized for being a very insufficient frame in elucidating the diverse condition of status in early Chosun dynasty. There was an attempt that paid attention to the point that each category of class is qualitatively varied (as being) divided the category of class and presented a general view of the structure.
However, now the debate on the idea of status or the status system came to a state of lull. In order to understand Early Chosun dynasty's and Chosun dynasty's status system, the study should be done more passively once more again.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 身分制 연구와 良賤制 논쟁
Ⅲ. 身分制 연구의 내용과 특징
Ⅳ. 良賤制論의 史學史的 의미와 한계
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
朝鮮初期 官衙構造硏究
계명사학
2002 .11
-
조선전기의 신분제도
동아문화
1976 .12
-
김교신의 조선산 기독교에 대한 역사적 이해 : 조선혼과 조선심을 중심으로
한국기독교와 역사
2017 .09
-
조선시대 소설유통의 ‘혁명성’ [서평] 정병설(2016), 『조선시대 소설의 생산과 유통』, 서울대학교출판문화원, 329쪽.
인문논총
2017 .01
-
帝国日本の文化権力: 1910年代京城の能と謡
일본연구
2014 .08
-
華夷觀과 조선조 사대부의 對外認識
중어중문학
2012 .04
-
식민지 공업화 문제의 연구사
인문학논총
2001 .08
-
조선후기 백자식기의 종류와 쓰임새
한국식생활문화학회지
2004 .01
-
공민왕 원년(1352)의 동아시아 삼국의 국내 정세와 왜구 : <고려 해도민(高麗海島民)=왜구의 일원(一員)>설에 관한 한 고찰
일본연구
2013 .08
-
The Present Status of Education
Korea Journal
1963 .04
-
서양인의 조선여행 기록문을 통한 근대 식생활사(食生活史) 연구
한국식생활문화학회지
2016 .01
-
1920년 전후 조선 상업회의소와 조선 산업정책의 확립
역사와경계
2006 .03
-
1960년~1970년대 한국사 개설서의 조선시대 상업사 서술과 상업사 연구
한국사연구
2019 .03
-
『史記』 古朝鮮 史料의 構成 분석과 新 解釋(1)
고조선단군학
2008 .05
-
朝鮮前期의 力農論
역사교육
1994 .12
-
朝鮮初期 書筵硏究
역사학보
1986 .06
-
1910년대 '朝鮮貴族'의 實態―『每日申報』 기사를 중심으로―
사학연구
2004 .12
-
도한 일본인의 일상과 식민지 ‘조선’의 생성 : 잡지 『조선(朝鮮)』 문예란을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2010 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018887246