지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Danjae Shin Chaeho was the most radical nationalist among writers Park Eunsik, Yu Wonpyo, Lee Injik, Ahn Gukseon, Lee Haejo and so on in the early modern age of Korea. Alongside of Jang Jiyeon and Park Eunsik, Shin Chaeho endlessly published his patriotic and postcolonial articles through the press. In 1910, he left for China. Imperialist Japan colonized the Korean peninsula with the compulsive treaty of annexation between the two countries on August 29th 1910. Shin’s postcolonial or patriotic independence movement was more active and stronger than anyone else’s in the early modern age of Korea. He was exceedingly critical of traitors to our country as the chief editor of Hwangseongsinmun and Deahanmaeilsinbo. In 1907, Maruyama, an adviser to police affairs in Japanese Residency-General labelled Danjae as “an able writer.” Danjae became the head of the postcolonial movement through newspaper and magazine. Above of all, he insisted the importance of cutting one’s hair, repaying the Korean government debt to Japan, and using the Korean national language. He did not hesitate to criticize pro-Japanese groups, Iljinhoi, Kuminsinbo, Daehansinmun and so on. Danjae was a symbol of intellectual resistance to Japan in the early modern age of Korea. He brought national enlightenment to the people through an old form of Korean verse, and wanted to establish an independent nation through the translation of patriotic biography and the writing of literary works.
Danjae took his own way, different from Jang Jiyeon and Park Eunsik, who were new Confucian scholars at that time. And other writers, like Lee Injik, Lee Haejo, and Ahn Gukseon, who wrote in the new style of fiction, were easily assimilated by Japanese Imperialism. Together with Park Eunsik, Danjae constantly resisted the Japanese and strictly adhered to Korea’s national identity and prompted an independence movement. His literary activity was variable : translation of biography, patriotic articles, national narratives, poetry and novels. Now, we need to have a new discussion about his literature and estimate its value. In this research, I demonstrate that Danjae wrote articles on literary reformation above all, and that he translated an patriotic biography and so on. The patriotic intellectuals expanded more actively the postcolonial movement overseas in the 1910’s. After his exile to Russia, Danjae published Kwoneupsinmun at Vladivostok and began a movement for patriotic enlightenment and the defense of national sovereignty. Later, he went to China, traced several historical regions and constantly wrote about Korean ancient history. He exerted himself to cultivate a national identity and tried to construct Korea as an ultimately independent state.
Danjae took his own way, different from Jang Jiyeon and Park Eunsik, who were new Confucian scholars at that time. And other writers, like Lee Injik, Lee Haejo, and Ahn Gukseon, who wrote in the new style of fiction, were easily assimilated by Japanese Imperialism. Together with Park Eunsik, Danjae constantly resisted the Japanese and strictly adhered to Korea’s national identity and prompted an independence movement. His literary activity was variable : translation of biography, patriotic articles, national narratives, poetry and novels. Now, we need to have a new discussion about his literature and estimate its value. In this research, I demonstrate that Danjae wrote articles on literary reformation above all, and that he translated an patriotic biography and so on. The patriotic intellectuals expanded more actively the postcolonial movement overseas in the 1910’s. After his exile to Russia, Danjae published Kwoneupsinmun at Vladivostok and began a movement for patriotic enlightenment and the defense of national sovereignty. Later, he went to China, traced several historical regions and constantly wrote about Korean ancient history. He exerted himself to cultivate a national identity and tried to construct Korea as an ultimately independent state.
#근대 초기
#계몽기 문학
#탈식민주의
#민족주의
#신채호
#박은식
#장지연
#문예개량론
#언문일치
#정론
#전기
#민족서사
#early modern age
#literature of enlightenment period
#postcolonism
#nationalism
#Shin Chaeho
#Park Eunsik
#Jang Jiyeon
#articles on literary reformation
#the unification of the written and spoken language
#patriotic articles
#biography
#national narrative
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 근대적 매체와 어문민족주의의 실천
3. 탈식민 문학과 민족독립국가의 염원
4. 마무리
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
신채호 집필 추정 작품에 대한 저자 논증
한국독립운동사연구
2016 .02
-
신채호의 서찰로 알려진 한시의 진위 고증
국어국문학
2020 .09
-
단재의 서사문학 계보와 「지구성미래몽」의 의미
어문학
2014 .09
-
벽혈단심(碧血丹心), 단재와 벽초의 우정
역사연구
2019 .12
-
『丹齋傳』硏究
동악어문학
2005 .02
-
단재 신채호의『권업신문』활동 시기에 대한 재검토
한국독립운동사연구
2015 .08
-
신라와 고구려를 바라보는 두 시선 : 단재 신채호와 범부 김정설의 역사인식
양명학
2013 .08
-
각종 취지서, 선언서의 저자들과 그 의미
어문학
2010 .03
-
단재 서사의 기억술과 부정의 정신
우리문학연구
2014 .01
-
단재 소설 <용과 용의 대격전>의 내용 및 형식
어문연구
2005 .01
-
『단재 신채호 전집』편찬의 의의와 과제 : 「역사편」을 중심으로
한국독립운동사연구
2008 .06
-
『황성신문』 논설과 단재 신채호
어문학
2008 .09
-
단재 전집 간행과 문학편의 문제점 고찰
한국독립운동사연구
2008 .06
-
계몽기 연극개량론과 단재 신채호
어문학
2009 .03
-
신채호의 아나키즘과 <龍과 龍의 大激戰> 고찰
한국현대문학연구
2000 .12
-
단재 신채호의 문학과 정전의 문제
현대소설연구
2007 .12
-
이광수와 신채호의 만남, 그리고 영향
한국현대문학연구
2016 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-018859304