지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Scotland in 1286 was an independent kingdom which had enjoyed substantial domestic peace for seventy years. The kingdom of Scotland was to be separate and free its offices filled by Scotsmen. The treaty of Birgham was not fulfilled because the heiress died. The Scottish community invited Edward Ⅰ to help them find next heir to their kingdom. John Balliol was adjudged heir and became Scottish king. After the battle of Dunbar in 1296, Scotland became a vassal lordship and many nobles and lairds were held to ransom in England. The new administration was staffed by Englishmen. If overlordship must be accepted, a Scottish king will appoint native officials and preserve customary dues.
The war aims of Robert Ⅰ were the recovery of Scottish territory and a peace recognizing him as rightful king of an independent Scotland. Robert Ⅰ's war with England was as far from success after at Bannockburn campaign as before. In the summer of 1317 two cardinal legates to the two kingdoms had arrived in England. John ⅩⅩⅡ would not open the bulls addressed to him as governor for ‘there are several Robert Bruces who in company with the other barons are governors of the kingdom of Scotland.’ The pope opened a rapid fire of bulls against Robert Ⅰ. His excommunication was to be repeated, interdict was threatened and he and his four bishops were cited to appear at Avignon by 1 May 1320. The king and bishops made no appearance. The declaration is a letter from the Scottish earls and barons to the pope urging him to persuade Edward Ⅱ to make peace, and dated at Arbroath on 6 April 1320.
The declaration of Arbroath is more than a baron’s letter, for it purports to come also from the nameless other barons and freeholders and whole community of the realm and although this was conventional phraseology it was nonetheless significant. The words of the declaration of Arbroath on freedom have a stronger ring and a clearer connotation of freedom from English lordship or rule.
I can not agree with professor Barrow’s assertion that baron's letter is a diplomatic document because it is a political paper to demonstrate spirit of Scottish independence. So I think that ‘the Declaration of Arbroath’ is ‘the Declaration of Independence’.
The war aims of Robert Ⅰ were the recovery of Scottish territory and a peace recognizing him as rightful king of an independent Scotland. Robert Ⅰ's war with England was as far from success after at Bannockburn campaign as before. In the summer of 1317 two cardinal legates to the two kingdoms had arrived in England. John ⅩⅩⅡ would not open the bulls addressed to him as governor for ‘there are several Robert Bruces who in company with the other barons are governors of the kingdom of Scotland.’ The pope opened a rapid fire of bulls against Robert Ⅰ. His excommunication was to be repeated, interdict was threatened and he and his four bishops were cited to appear at Avignon by 1 May 1320. The king and bishops made no appearance. The declaration is a letter from the Scottish earls and barons to the pope urging him to persuade Edward Ⅱ to make peace, and dated at Arbroath on 6 April 1320.
The declaration of Arbroath is more than a baron’s letter, for it purports to come also from the nameless other barons and freeholders and whole community of the realm and although this was conventional phraseology it was nonetheless significant. The words of the declaration of Arbroath on freedom have a stronger ring and a clearer connotation of freedom from English lordship or rule.
I can not agree with professor Barrow’s assertion that baron's letter is a diplomatic document because it is a political paper to demonstrate spirit of Scottish independence. So I think that ‘the Declaration of Arbroath’ is ‘the Declaration of Independence’.
목차
1. ‘아부로스 선언’이란 무엇인가?
2. ‘아부로스 선언’ 발표의 역사적 배경
3. ‘아부로스 선언’의 기원과 내용 분석
4. ‘아부로스 선언’ 발표의 역사적 의미
5. 결론
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - T. Thomson / 1814 / Acts of the Parliaments of Scotland vol.I
2. [단행본] - William Croft Dickinson / 1958 / A Source Book of Scottish History, vol.1
3. [단행본] - T. Rymer / 1816 / Foedera, Conventiones, Litterae Cuinscunque Generiis Acta Publica
4. [단행본] - Ranald Nicholson / 1974 / Scotland: The Later Middle Ages, The Edinburgh History of Scotland, vol.2
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 홍성표 / 2007 / 에드워드 1세의 대스코틀랜드 정책의 의미 / 서양중세사연구 19 : 112 ~
2. [단행본] - William Croft Dickinson / 1958 / A Source Book of Scottish History, vol.1
3. [단행본] - T. Rymer / 1816 / Foedera, Conventiones, Litterae Cuinscunque Generiis Acta Publica
4. [단행본] - Ranald Nicholson / 1974 / Scotland: The Later Middle Ages, The Edinburgh History of Scotland, vol.2
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 홍성표 / 2007 / 에드워드 1세의 대스코틀랜드 정책의 의미 / 서양중세사연구 19 : 112 ~
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1320년 ‘아브로스 선언(Declaration of Arbroath)’ - 역사성과 현재성의 합주 -
영국 연구
2017 .01
-
3·1운동의 기억 -비폭력·평화의 관점에서 자료 다시 읽기-
한국독립운동사연구
2019 .05
-
로버트 브루스와 스코틀랜드 독립 전쟁
역사와 담론
2008 .09
-
아부라함의 신앙
신학지남
1939 .07
-
아부 알리, 죽지 마
황해문화
2003 .09
-
요한의 시간관
복음과 신학
2010 .12
-
스코틀랜드 독립운동의 기원 : 에드워드 1세(1272-1307) 통치기를 중심으로
역사와 담론
2007 .12
-
유네스코 기후변화 윤리원칙 선언 - 함의와 쟁점 -
인간연구
2019 .07
-
카이로선언과 일본의 영토문제
영토해양연구
2013 .06
-
이슬람 인권사상과 카이로인권선언 : 그 신학적, 역사적 배경과 쟁점
철학논총
2003 .04
-
사무엘상 28장 15-19절의 신적 선언 해석
복음과 실천
2018 .09
-
여론과 대북정책은 조응하는가? 4.27 판문점 선언 전후 국민의식조사의 경험적 연구
담론201
2020 .01
-
카이로선언의 기초와 한반도 독립 조항의 의미 : 전후 단순 분리 독립의 기원
동북아역사논총
2016 .12
-
반-노동선언
문화과학
2001 .06
-
남북기본합의서와 6·15남북공동선언
역사비평
2011 .11
-
독도 문제에 관한 국제사회의 전후처리 조치와 카이로선언의 법적 효력에 대한 이해
영토해양연구
2013 .06
-
요한복음서의 계시이해 : 요 5:31과 요 8:14를 중심으로
신약논단
2009 .09
-
[시론] 6ㆍ15남북공동선언 5주년과 남북관계 전망
역사와현실
2005 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-018853472