메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서강대학교 법학연구소 서강법학 서강법학 제11권 제1호
발행연도
2009.6
수록면
217 - 259 (43page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There are several practical legal issues in relation to the delisiting decision by the Korea Securities Exchange(hereinafter as "the Exchange"); The legal nature of the Exchange, the listing regulation of the Exchange and the delisting decision by the Exchange; the legal instrument of listing company against delisting decision by the Exchange. This researcher reviewed arguments about above issues and actual lawsuit cases in relation to those.
This researcher came to the conclusion that the nature of the Exchange is a private body corporation as stock company, the nature of legal relationship between the Exchange and listing company is also private contract relationship(not public), the listing regulation of the Exchange has the nature as a stipulation, the delisting decision by the Exchange has the nature as declaration of intention of the termination of the listing contract between the Exchange and the listing company.
So, the delisted company by the Exchange has to bring a civil action(not administrative action) against the Exchange for wrongfulness of the delisting decision. There are several lawsuit cases related to the delisting decision by the Exchange. The court of justice handed down the decision that the delisting decision of the Exchange by reason of the outside auditor's opinion, dishonor of the paper or check issued by the listing company, capital invasion, non submission of the annual report and so on(we can say this as formal and merchenical delsiting reason) is lawful. The court judged that it is inevitable to set up a unificative and uniformed standard, and to enforce that strictly and mechanically. However, the court decided that it is unlawful to delist the company by the only reason of the filing for the company's revival to a court.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 증권거래소의 상장폐지결정에 관한 그 동안의 논의의 정리
Ⅲ. 형식적 상장폐지사유에 근거한 상장폐지결정에 대한 분쟁사례 및 검토
Ⅳ. 실질적 심사에 의한 상장폐지사유의 도입과 이에 대한 분쟁사례
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018837450