지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Russia, hoping to be a key oil supplier Northeast Asian economy as well as the largest oil exporting country in the world, is under serious consideration of constructing several oil pipelines. 'Russia Energy Strategy 2020,' which was declared last September as the basic energy policy for the next two decades, provides that new oil pipelines should be built to enhance efficiency of oil export and in particular, to diversify Russia's oil exporting market. The latter implies the necessity of a new pipeline construction in East Siberia which is geographically close to Northeast Asia. For the last several years, however, there has been a debate over whether Russia should allow building private oil pipeline or should maintain the current national monopoly of oil pipeline system. Recently, president Putin conceded that new pipeline should be constructed although he did not stand on any side of the debate.
In East Siberia, two possible lines are proposed. One is a line from Angarsk, an oil city in East Siberia, to Daqing, China's oil town in a Northeast province and the other is from Angarsk and Nahodka, Russia's ice-free port in Far East. As East Siberian oil pipeline is expected to have a significant impact on oil supply security in Northeast Asian economies, they are making desperate efforts to help Russia choose a line which is beneficial for their own economy. China, which faces a growing oil import and as a result, is increasingly concerned about oil security has supported Daqing line. Japan, on the other hand, is seriously interested in Nahodka line which is likely strengthen Japan's energy security. These two econo-political giants in the region have been competing each other over the last several years. The U.S., which has kept a strategic relations with Russia since the 9.11 terror, does not address a clear policy over the Russia's Far East pipeline plan. Although the U.S. is not part of Northeast Asian economy but has substantial influence over the region, its policy orientation toward the East Siberian pipeline seems to be important in the future.
Korea, which is a key component of oil supply and demand balance in Northeast Asian economy will be exposed directly and indirectly to the influence of Russia' oil supply to the region. It is true that until now, Korea does not make a clear decision about whether to take part in the project. East Siberian oil pipeline, particularly Nahodka line is expected to provide several benefits to Korea's energy supply system. As Russia's oil policy is more complex and complicate, Korea should be flexible in coping with the policy changes in Russia's East Siberian oil development and infrastructure building.
In East Siberia, two possible lines are proposed. One is a line from Angarsk, an oil city in East Siberia, to Daqing, China's oil town in a Northeast province and the other is from Angarsk and Nahodka, Russia's ice-free port in Far East. As East Siberian oil pipeline is expected to have a significant impact on oil supply security in Northeast Asian economies, they are making desperate efforts to help Russia choose a line which is beneficial for their own economy. China, which faces a growing oil import and as a result, is increasingly concerned about oil security has supported Daqing line. Japan, on the other hand, is seriously interested in Nahodka line which is likely strengthen Japan's energy security. These two econo-political giants in the region have been competing each other over the last several years. The U.S., which has kept a strategic relations with Russia since the 9.11 terror, does not address a clear policy over the Russia's Far East pipeline plan. Although the U.S. is not part of Northeast Asian economy but has substantial influence over the region, its policy orientation toward the East Siberian pipeline seems to be important in the future.
Korea, which is a key component of oil supply and demand balance in Northeast Asian economy will be exposed directly and indirectly to the influence of Russia' oil supply to the region. It is true that until now, Korea does not make a clear decision about whether to take part in the project. East Siberian oil pipeline, particularly Nahodka line is expected to provide several benefits to Korea's energy supply system. As Russia's oil policy is more complex and complicate, Korea should be flexible in coping with the policy changes in Russia's East Siberian oil development and infrastructure building.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 러시아 송유관 정책과 동시베리아 송유관 건설 동향
Ⅲ. 동북아 관련국가의 입장 및 전략
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사할린을 포함한 극동 러시아지역 자원과 일본의 에너지 경제정책
동북아 문화연구
2008 .06
-
Optimal Design of Oil Pipeline Network
한국경영과학회지
1981 .12
-
韓國 石油産業의 競爭力强化에 관한 硏究 : 政策課題를 中心으로
관세학회지
2002 .08
-
미국의 분열적 중동정책과 제1차 석유파동:아랍-이스라엘, 메이저 회사, 국내정치적 구조
한국중동학회논총
2008 .01
-
中國의 原油 確保戰略과 韓國의 對應方案
지역개발연구
2006 .06
-
동북아 오일허브 정책의 성과와 전망에 대한 연구
무역학회지
2019 .12
-
The China-Russia East Pipeline Could Redraw Northeast Asia’s Energy Supply
Global Asia
2020 .03
-
동북아 석유물류중심지 여건과 경쟁력 비교ㆍ분석
무역학회지
2007 .02
-
러시아 동시베리아 송유관 정채결정요인에 관한 비판적 고찰
국가전략
2005 .01
-
어업용 유류의 안정적인 공급에 관한 연구
수산경영론집
2000 .01
-
싱가포르 석유물류허브 벤치마킹을 통한 우리나라의 동북아 오일허브 발전 연구
통상정보연구
2009 .06
-
Stock Market Reaction to Oil Price Shocks: A Comparison between an Oil-exporting Economy and an Oil-importing Economy
계량경제학보
2011 .01
-
Russia Looks South As Well As East
Global Asia
2012 .06
-
국가송유망 침해범죄의 현황과 대응체계에 관한 연구
범죄수사학연구
2016 .12
-
국제원유 가격의 급등락 원인과 아프리카 자원개발
한국아프리카학회지
2008 .12
-
러시아의 대(對)동북아 석유·가스 공급망 구축 : 국제·지역정치적 의미 및 영향에 대한 네트워크 세계정치론적 이해
국제정치논총
2012 .09
-
주요 석유수입국의 석유안보를 위한 전략 연구 : 석유비축과 유류세 정책을 중심으로
에너지경제연구
2016 .09
-
中國의 에너지資源 確保戰略과 波及效果
산업경제연구
2007 .04
-
국제유가 변동요인의 특성에 관한 연구
무역연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
중국-미얀마 송유관 건설의 정치적 배경 및 효과
김송죽
국제정치논총
2013
.12
신 거대게임 : 카스피해 에너지자원을 둘러싼 강대국간 지정학적 경쟁
강삼구
전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소 국내학술회의
2008
.10
시베리아 횡단철도의 활성화 방안 : 노보시비르스크의 물류수송 거점화 구상과 전망
윤영미
,
권원순
산업경제연구
2004
.12
동북아 물류 중심인 한반도종단철도(TKR)와 시베리아횡단철도(TSR)ㆍ중국종단철도(TCR)의 연계추진에 관한 실태분석
김경희
,
이학승
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2004
.04
MB정부 ‘저탄소 녹색성장 전략’에 대한 정치경제학적 고찰
이상헌
환경사회학연구 ECO
2009
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-321-018568488