지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
For generations, American law has professed "the best interests of the child" doctrine, a "threshold standard," as the basis for american court decision and legislative intent concerning children.
Especially I have studied concerning the Best Interests of the Child in the American Adoption Law. As a result, The best interests of the child should be the guiding and controlling factor in determining its custody. However, the following discussion will note: 1) where a american court disregarded the "best interests of the child" standard and awarded custody to the father on the basis of the natural father's claim that his parental right was improperly terminated; 2) where a american court awarded custody under a "best interest of the child" standard notwithstanding the fact that the biological father defied orders from two state courts to return a child to the mother's home; and, 3) where a court could not overlook a filing error, and denied a grandmother's adoption petition. The third case is the basis for this study, and it clearly offers the proposition that committing a large error, like refusing to relinquish a child, does not preclude a court from applying the standard, but a small error, like a filing mistake, does.
As the Kittle court concluded, "Our first and foremost concern here, as in all child custody cases, is the welfare of the child. All other matters, including the misconduct of the father in violating court orders," and you have the holding that the Supreme Court of Illinois should properly have made: "Since the child is the real party in interest, it is his best interest and corollary rights that come before anything else, including the interests and rights of biological and adoptive parents." substitute "the procedural error committed by L.S.C." for "the misconduct of the father in violating court orders," and you have the holding the Utah courts should properly have made to allow L.S.C. to have at least visitation rights with her grandchildren, if not a hearing on the merits of her petition to adopt them outright.
Especially I have studied concerning the Best Interests of the Child in the American Adoption Law. As a result, The best interests of the child should be the guiding and controlling factor in determining its custody. However, the following discussion will note: 1) where a american court disregarded the "best interests of the child" standard and awarded custody to the father on the basis of the natural father's claim that his parental right was improperly terminated; 2) where a american court awarded custody under a "best interest of the child" standard notwithstanding the fact that the biological father defied orders from two state courts to return a child to the mother's home; and, 3) where a court could not overlook a filing error, and denied a grandmother's adoption petition. The third case is the basis for this study, and it clearly offers the proposition that committing a large error, like refusing to relinquish a child, does not preclude a court from applying the standard, but a small error, like a filing mistake, does.
As the Kittle court concluded, "Our first and foremost concern here, as in all child custody cases, is the welfare of the child. All other matters, including the misconduct of the father in violating court orders," and you have the holding that the Supreme Court of Illinois should properly have made: "Since the child is the real party in interest, it is his best interest and corollary rights that come before anything else, including the interests and rights of biological and adoptive parents." substitute "the procedural error committed by L.S.C." for "the misconduct of the father in violating court orders," and you have the holding the Utah courts should properly have made to allow L.S.C. to have at least visitation rights with her grandchildren, if not a hearing on the merits of her petition to adopt them outright.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
Ⅱ. 미국의 入養法
Ⅲ. 子의 福利 最優先 考慮의 原則
Ⅳ. 最上의 子女利益과 訴訟節次要件
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미국의 친자법에 관한 연구
강원법학
2004 .06
-
미국의 입양법에 관한 고찰
강원법학
2004 .12
-
조손간의 면접교섭권
한양법학
2012 .02
-
미국에서의 친권결정에 관한 연구
비교사법
2009 .03
-
이혼 시 자녀의 친권과 양육권 선택에 대한 인식 연구
한국가족복지학
2011 .01
-
The Place Of The Supreme Court Of The United States In The American System
저스티스
1984 .10
-
아버지의 양육행동과 유아의 생활능력간의 관계
아동학회지
1999 .12
-
생산적인 아버지 노릇 및 양육방식에 관한 비교문화적 연구 : 한국과 미국 아버지를 대상으로
아동학회지
2002 .02
-
동시를 통해 아동이 묘사한 아버지의 모습
아동학회지
1996 .12
-
아버지의 자녀에 대한 가치 및 미래 기대와 양육분담
한국보육지원학회지
2017 .01
-
아버지 -아동관계에 관한 이론적 고찰 : 아버지의 역할 및 아버지 - 아동의 상호작용을 중심으로
아동학회지
1983 .12
-
현행 아동복지법에 관한 고찰 : 특히 아동학대와 관련하여
한양법학
2010 .08
-
美國憲法上 司法權 關聯 規定의 構造와 內容
미국헌법연구
2005 .09
-
아동의 부양에 대한 재검토
민사법의 이론과 실무
2011 .01
-
생산적인 아버지노릇과 유아의 애착안정성의 발달적 결과 : 단기종단적 연구
아동학회지
2001 .06
-
한국 아동과 미국 아동의 일상 심리학 : 대구와 버지니아주 아동의 비교
한국영유아보육학
2002 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018393177