지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are diverse methods to understand a nation systematically. And study about the palace that can be mentioned of the core part of capital city, providing basic data for understanding characteristics of the nation obviously, has a deep meaning. Not excepting the case of Silla Kingdom. but study about that may be so rare. Woel-Seong(月城), which we think is the palace, has not yet excavated and there's a limit to restore the palace. Thus we've understood 'Front Reign-Back Sleep(前朝後寢)' and 'Three Reign Systernf(三朝制)' as basic formation of palace disposition of Sui and Tang periods(隋唐代) without obvious reason. Of course, this is reasonable basically with the flow of East Asian capital rule.
But in the case of Silla Kingdom, we can see capital rule before Sui and Tang periods and we need to verify the other parts rather than Sui and Tang's palace disposition itself. Embossed thing is West Vice-Pavilion(西堂) of Silla's palace, In fact, the case of China West Vice-Pavilion has totally disappeared after Sui and Tang.
The problem is whether Silla have Taeguk-Pavilion(太極殿) which is essential to West Vice-Pavilion. We cannot find the data tells directly Taeguk-Pavilion's existence. Of course we can see there was the center palace by the case of Main Pavilion(正殿) of King Jinpyong(眞平王) and Jowonjun(朝元殿) of King Jindeok(眞德王). And terms of Linae(裏內) and Dang(堂) in stone monument of King Jinhung(眞興王巡狩碑) tell us existence of palace have Naeli(內裏) and Jodang(朝堂) that already was in Japanese palace.
But it's difficult that clear up the existence of Taeguk-Pavilion by only this. So we examine comparison with Hwangryongsa(黃龍寺), the biggest temple of Silla's capital. Because 9 cells(間) in front side (including blind 11 cells) Golden Shriner (金堂) that constructed in Hwangryongsa was the scale that cannot be compared in Korea. But we can find same Golden Shrines in North Wei(北魏) Yongningsi(永寧寺), that has close relation with capital rule, and Taikanaiji(大官大寺) in Japan. And Golden Shrianes in Yongningsi and Taikantaji have the same disposition with each of Taeguk-Pavilion, In case of Hwangryongsa, because Golden Shrine have same scale with Takguk-Pavilion we can imagine the existence of Main Pavilion that have same scale with Takguk-Pavilion, That is, Taeguk-Pavilion duplication system is operated in middle-oldUpiJ) Silla's palace.
Anyway Hwanryongsa has building left and right side of Golden Shrine contrary to other temples. We think this as West Vice-Pavilion beside of Taeguk-Pavilion of Silla's palace. And this is so different with existing view that see disposition of Hwangryongsa as Three Golden Shrines(三金堂) simply. Taeguk-Pavilion and East-West Vice-Pavilion of palace have obvious relation of major and minor. We can see that in Hwangryongsa s Recreation, left and right side builing of Golden Shrine have same disposition with West Vice-Pavilion of palace in parallel disposition and scale of front side 7 cells. So we can see West Vice-Pavilion of Silla s palace have deep relation with Hwangryongsa's reconstruction in middle-old time(中古期).
In this way. we look into some characteristics of Silla's palace focusing on West Vice-Pavilion of Samguksagi(三國史記)'. I hope that Silla's palace can restore more clearly through a study like this.
But in the case of Silla Kingdom, we can see capital rule before Sui and Tang periods and we need to verify the other parts rather than Sui and Tang's palace disposition itself. Embossed thing is West Vice-Pavilion(西堂) of Silla's palace, In fact, the case of China West Vice-Pavilion has totally disappeared after Sui and Tang.
The problem is whether Silla have Taeguk-Pavilion(太極殿) which is essential to West Vice-Pavilion. We cannot find the data tells directly Taeguk-Pavilion's existence. Of course we can see there was the center palace by the case of Main Pavilion(正殿) of King Jinpyong(眞平王) and Jowonjun(朝元殿) of King Jindeok(眞德王). And terms of Linae(裏內) and Dang(堂) in stone monument of King Jinhung(眞興王巡狩碑) tell us existence of palace have Naeli(內裏) and Jodang(朝堂) that already was in Japanese palace.
But it's difficult that clear up the existence of Taeguk-Pavilion by only this. So we examine comparison with Hwangryongsa(黃龍寺), the biggest temple of Silla's capital. Because 9 cells(間) in front side (including blind 11 cells) Golden Shriner (金堂) that constructed in Hwangryongsa was the scale that cannot be compared in Korea. But we can find same Golden Shrines in North Wei(北魏) Yongningsi(永寧寺), that has close relation with capital rule, and Taikanaiji(大官大寺) in Japan. And Golden Shrianes in Yongningsi and Taikantaji have the same disposition with each of Taeguk-Pavilion, In case of Hwangryongsa, because Golden Shrine have same scale with Takguk-Pavilion we can imagine the existence of Main Pavilion that have same scale with Takguk-Pavilion, That is, Taeguk-Pavilion duplication system is operated in middle-oldUpiJ) Silla's palace.
Anyway Hwanryongsa has building left and right side of Golden Shrine contrary to other temples. We think this as West Vice-Pavilion beside of Taeguk-Pavilion of Silla's palace. And this is so different with existing view that see disposition of Hwangryongsa as Three Golden Shrines(三金堂) simply. Taeguk-Pavilion and East-West Vice-Pavilion of palace have obvious relation of major and minor. We can see that in Hwangryongsa s Recreation, left and right side builing of Golden Shrine have same disposition with West Vice-Pavilion of palace in parallel disposition and scale of front side 7 cells. So we can see West Vice-Pavilion of Silla s palace have deep relation with Hwangryongsa's reconstruction in middle-old time(中古期).
In this way. we look into some characteristics of Silla's palace focusing on West Vice-Pavilion of Samguksagi(三國史記)'. I hope that Silla's palace can restore more clearly through a study like this.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 《三國史記》 ‘西堂’ 記事의 比較分析
Ⅲ. 新羅 中古期 都城制와 太極殿
Ⅳ. 皇龍寺를 통해 본 宮闕의 東西堂制의 採用問題
Ⅴ. 나가며
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Clear Water Pavilion
Korea Journal
1975 .08
-
安東地方 樓亭文學 硏究 - 樓亭板上詩文을 中心으로 -
어문학
2004 .03
-
月池宮 관련 자료 재검토 — 東宮은 太子宮이 아니다 —
동양고전연구
2014 .01
-
Tennyson’s Poetics of Sorrow in “Mariana” and “The Palace of Art”
영어영문학연구
2007 .01
-
삼국통일 전후 신라 도성의 공간 구조 변화
역사비평
2019 .08
-
高句麗 安鶴宮 中央 建築群에 대한 考察 -前殿 高臺建築 形制의 채용을 중심으로-
중국사연구
2008 .01
-
‘汗宮’에서 ‘皇宮’으로; 瀋陽 故宮의 文化的 含意
중국사연구
2008 .01
-
정치와 교육이 공존하는 궁궐
국학연구
2010 .12
-
Ancient Palaces in Seoul
Korea Journal
1963 .08
-
신라 황룡사의 창건과 진흥왕의 왕권 강화
한국고대사연구
2013 .12
-
조선 궁궐 입지 선정의 기준과 지형에 대한 연구- 경복궁과 창덕궁을 중심으로 -
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2019 .01
-
The Palace Pond
Korea Journal
1976 .10
-
한국과 중국의 궁궐어원의 상석 비교연구
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2003 .01
-
｢嶺南樓重修記｣의 結構와 그 特性 -1851년경의 安氏 작품을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2009 .01
-
조선 肅宗 『御製宮闕志』 탐색
장서각
2013 .04
-
Eojegunggueolji (御製宮闕志) by King Sukjong
장서각
2013 .04
-
물질문화로 보는 삼국통일 - 고고학적 접근
역사비평
2020 .05
-
장흥의 樓亭과 樓亭詩의 사회ㆍ문화적 맥락
지방사와 지방문화
2011 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-911-018287564