지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The study is for life-rehabilitation teachers at handicapped living facilities according to the ecology -systematic character, what factor influence to the quality of life, and more to suggest social welfare practical method in order to improve of life's quality. For this, as ecology-systematic view, How the lower level's factor can influence to life-rehabilitation teachers' the quality of life.
To accomplish the purpose of study, it is researched 119 people who work 4 living facilities for mental-retard at Kyungbuk through the structured questionnaire.
First, Condition that life-rehabilitation teachers are realizing the ecology-systematic character is usually general, macro-system character is very high, middle -system and then micro-system order. General standard about the quality of life is little bit higher than general. It is appeared like the order ; present problems, family-relationship, food ,clothing & housing, friend-relationship, daily life and happiness. It shows higher quality of life than Yang ok kyung (1994) and Lee sun young(2004)'s study results. It implies life-rehabilitation teachers relatively higher than students and mental-retard. Subject of study: life-rehabilitation teachers have clear goal of life, value than students, the mental-retard have unclear future but life-rehabilitation teachers are self-satisfied even though coarse working-conditions.
Second, Their (teachers) interrelation between ecologysystematic character and quality of life has correlation with high feeling.Among the lower factors, daily life and happiness factors are higher feeling correlation than other factors. Like this results, it is similar to Lee sung young (2004)'s study but this study showed more high correlation. It means that life-rehabilitation teachers are more affected by ecology-systematic character and they live their lives under the condition. Above all, to show the highest correlation of daily life and happiness is considered the goodness for life that meet the handicapped as a duty. We can see the close relation between life-rehabilitation teachers' life and life of clients' at handicapped facilities.
Third, life-rehabilitation teachers' ecology-systematic character influence to the quality of life. Explanation about general life-quality is very high to the lower factors, except the present problems, food, clothing & housing, relationship of friend & family, health-condition, daily life and happiness usually appeared high explanation. Also, Even though not paying attention to the middle-system, but to be reported that macro-system and micro-system have power. Especially macro-system affects more than micro-system. At Lee sun young(2004)'s study, it reveals that micro-system is the highest factor to influence but this study, it appears that macro-system is the highest factor. The study results show the most important factor for quality of life-rehabilitation teachers is the support from society that means they are under others' concern and love.
Through this study result, I want to suggest the practical things.
First, as the results of study, the most influential factor to the quality of life to them is appeared macro-systematic social support. Social support except for family means support and approval from others. It should be considered quantitative aspect and qualitative aspect to improve social support. For this, satisfy their wants, provide system-condition to guide interaction with others and they should improve their lives' quality by good social support.
Second, results of study, their micro-system (family function) affects to quality of life. Until now, importance of social welfare intervention about family is considered the need of intervention. Social welfare intervention to family-centered micro-system for them is possible to act advocate's role. Concretely, advocate's role about an object of micro-systematic family have difficulty through the poor work environment, should protect their rights and act to search the political changes.
Like above, to improve their life quality who work at the handicapped facilities, if we practice the practical right to keep the social welfare character, as an area of social specialty, unlike other social workers, can be unified to social combination for mental-retard by different specialty. Moreover they can influence not only their life quality but also the mental-retard.
To accomplish the purpose of study, it is researched 119 people who work 4 living facilities for mental-retard at Kyungbuk through the structured questionnaire.
First, Condition that life-rehabilitation teachers are realizing the ecology-systematic character is usually general, macro-system character is very high, middle -system and then micro-system order. General standard about the quality of life is little bit higher than general. It is appeared like the order ; present problems, family-relationship, food ,clothing & housing, friend-relationship, daily life and happiness. It shows higher quality of life than Yang ok kyung (1994) and Lee sun young(2004)'s study results. It implies life-rehabilitation teachers relatively higher than students and mental-retard. Subject of study: life-rehabilitation teachers have clear goal of life, value than students, the mental-retard have unclear future but life-rehabilitation teachers are self-satisfied even though coarse working-conditions.
Second, Their (teachers) interrelation between ecologysystematic character and quality of life has correlation with high feeling.Among the lower factors, daily life and happiness factors are higher feeling correlation than other factors. Like this results, it is similar to Lee sung young (2004)'s study but this study showed more high correlation. It means that life-rehabilitation teachers are more affected by ecology-systematic character and they live their lives under the condition. Above all, to show the highest correlation of daily life and happiness is considered the goodness for life that meet the handicapped as a duty. We can see the close relation between life-rehabilitation teachers' life and life of clients' at handicapped facilities.
Third, life-rehabilitation teachers' ecology-systematic character influence to the quality of life. Explanation about general life-quality is very high to the lower factors, except the present problems, food, clothing & housing, relationship of friend & family, health-condition, daily life and happiness usually appeared high explanation. Also, Even though not paying attention to the middle-system, but to be reported that macro-system and micro-system have power. Especially macro-system affects more than micro-system. At Lee sun young(2004)'s study, it reveals that micro-system is the highest factor to influence but this study, it appears that macro-system is the highest factor. The study results show the most important factor for quality of life-rehabilitation teachers is the support from society that means they are under others' concern and love.
Through this study result, I want to suggest the practical things.
First, as the results of study, the most influential factor to the quality of life to them is appeared macro-systematic social support. Social support except for family means support and approval from others. It should be considered quantitative aspect and qualitative aspect to improve social support. For this, satisfy their wants, provide system-condition to guide interaction with others and they should improve their lives' quality by good social support.
Second, results of study, their micro-system (family function) affects to quality of life. Until now, importance of social welfare intervention about family is considered the need of intervention. Social welfare intervention to family-centered micro-system for them is possible to act advocate's role. Concretely, advocate's role about an object of micro-systematic family have difficulty through the poor work environment, should protect their rights and act to search the political changes.
Like above, to improve their life quality who work at the handicapped facilities, if we practice the practical right to keep the social welfare character, as an area of social specialty, unlike other social workers, can be unified to social combination for mental-retard by different specialty. Moreover they can influence not only their life quality but also the mental-retard.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 조사결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 함의
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Life
Korea Journal
1972 .08
-
생명에 대한 존재론적 인식과 생명미학적 정치
철학탐구
2014 .11
-
Perceptions of the Quality of Life and Social Conflicts
Korea Journal
1989 .09
-
‘삶의 질’과 ‘생명의 신성함’ 생명윤리
인간연구
2007 .07
-
Process of Change in Korean Family Life
Korea Journal
1963 .10
-
저승설화의 전승 양상에 관한 연구 : 구전설화를 중심으로
비교민속학
2007 .02
-
黃順元 小說 硏究 : 「神들의 주사위」를 중심으로
동아인문학
2004 .12
-
원불교 종교활동과 노년기의 주관적 삶의 질 : 생애사적 접근
종교연구
2012 .03
-
Historical Review of Korean Family Life
Korea Journal
1963 .10
-
Life Styles
Korea Journal
1980 .07
-
Welfare Society and Life Environments
Korea Journal
1979 .09
-
[A Story] The New Life
Korea Journal
1968 .03
-
His Life, Thought, Achievement
Korea Journal
1964 .06
-
삶의 의미(meaning in life) 의식 증진을 위한 지도 방법
윤리연구
2019 .01
-
일제말 전시체제하 ‘국민생활’의 강제와 그 실태 : 일상적 소비생활을 중심으로
한국사학보
2011 .08
-
司馬遷과 屈原을 통해 본 사회적 생명의 지속과 단절
중국어문학논집
2014 .02
-
행복의 조건 : 레비나스와 더불어 ‘행복’을 생각함
현상학과 현대철학
2015 .09
-
저소득가정 아동의 방과후 생활실태 및 가족지지가 학교생활적응에 미치는 영향
신학과 목회
2010 .05
-
A Song of Life (9)
Korea Journal
1980 .06
-
참조효과에 따른 종교생활에 대한 인식 : 내재적ㆍ외재적 종교생활의 비교
종교문화연구
2010 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-230-018302779