지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper we have discussed the analyses of A+I (Accusative Plus Infinitive) construction in English, which believe-type verbs take, such as early STOR (Subject To Object Raising) analysis, ECM (Exceptional Case Marking) analysis, recent and revised STOR analysis. And we have investigated the evidences for STOR analysis and ECM analysis. After that we have discussed the categorial status of the complement clauses which believe-type verbs take. This paper can be summarized and concluded as follows:
The study of A+I construction has a long history. The first-type of analysis for this construction was STOR analysis, after that, ECM analysis appeared, and then revised STOR analysis appeared. With the decoupling of underlying semantic positions and surface functional case positions being explored in recent minimalist versions of transformational grammar, the need for the ECM approach has declined and the revised STOR analysis is the only one consistent with new architecture of the theory.
In conclusion, all the types of analysis for A+I construction has each their own advantages, but it seems that STOR analysis, especially revised STOR analysis is better than ECM analysis. And it seems to be desirable that studies on A+I construction should be approached from both syntactic and semantic point of view since the NP after the main verb in A+I construction in English is the direct object from the syntactic viewpoint, and it is the subject of the embedded clause from semantic viewpoint. But a further study is needed.
The study of A+I construction has a long history. The first-type of analysis for this construction was STOR analysis, after that, ECM analysis appeared, and then revised STOR analysis appeared. With the decoupling of underlying semantic positions and surface functional case positions being explored in recent minimalist versions of transformational grammar, the need for the ECM approach has declined and the revised STOR analysis is the only one consistent with new architecture of the theory.
In conclusion, all the types of analysis for A+I construction has each their own advantages, but it seems that STOR analysis, especially revised STOR analysis is better than ECM analysis. And it seems to be desirable that studies on A+I construction should be approached from both syntactic and semantic point of view since the NP after the main verb in A+I construction in English is the direct object from the syntactic viewpoint, and it is the subject of the embedded clause from semantic viewpoint. But a further study is needed.
목차
1. 서론
2. A+I 구조의 분석법
3. STOR 분석법과 ECM 분석법에 대한 증거
4. A+I 구조가 취하는 보어절의 범주적 지위
5. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
ECM in English and Korean as a focus construction Revisited : Morphological case approach to ECM in English and Korean
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
1999 .05
-
영어의 ECM 구문 분석
영어영문학21
2007 .01
-
ECM as a Focus Construction Revisited : Morphological Case Approach to ECM Construction
새한영어영문학
1999 .11
-
On the Surface Position of an ECM Subject
생성문법연구
2011 .01
-
ECM Constructions Redux
언어
2012 .09
-
Optional Raising in ECM and Labeling of XP-YP
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Case Licensing of the ECMed Nominal by a Light Verb
영어영문학연구
2007 .01
-
A Study on ECM Infinitive Structure
생성문법연구
2004 .01
-
Korean ECM : Semantic and Pragmatic Factors
언어과학연구
1995 .12
-
Raising and Default Case in ECM Constructions
언어학 연구
2010 .12
-
한국어에서의 예외격(ECM) 구문과 자동 주격 분석
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
A Raising-to-Object Analysis of Korean ECM Constructions
생성문법연구
2007 .01
-
ECM Revisited
생성문법연구
2003 .01
-
한국 고등학교 교과서에 사용된 영어동사의 보충절 분석
새한영어영문학
2016 .11
-
부정사 구문의 함축 의미와 영/한 통ㆍ번역
통번역교육연구
2020 .01
-
석독구결의 동사 구문 ( 1 )
한국어학
2001 .12
-
A Study on the Light Verb Construction in English and Korean
어학연구
1994 .03
-
The Structure of Causative Verb Complements in English
새한영어영문학
2006 .08
-
Non-Clause-Bounded A-Movement : A Cross-Linguistic Study of ECM Constructions
어학연구
1993 .12
-
Semantic Constraints on Coercion : An Empirical Study
영어학
2014 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-705-018294587