지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A series of Chinese national projects on history, such as 'Dan-dae Project(斷代工程)'→'Tam￢won Project(探源工程)'→'Dong-buk Project(東北工程)'→'The Doctrine of Liao-he Civilization(遼河文明論)' have hidden goal to establish Nee-Imperialism of China. All these Chinese national projects on history based on 'Unified nation State Theory(統一的多民族國家論), of China.
But, 'Unified multinational State Theory' of China have many theoretical inconsistency and contradictions.
At first, the concept of 'Zhonghua race(中華民族)' that combines 55 minority races and 1 majority race into 'another 1 race' is not fit for use in science. That is a theoretical contradiction.
For example, USA has many kinds of minority races. We can not call all of them 'American race(美國民族)' but 'American or American people(美國人)'. In the same manner, in case of China we can not call 'Zhonghua race(中華民族)' but 'Chinese or Chinese people(中國人)'. So, the concept of 'Zhonghua race(中華民族), is a pure fiction that combines many kinds of different races into one race.
Secondly, the concept of 'the border/territory of China' that is frequently used in 'Unified multinational State Theory' is not fit for use in science. It is a very vague concept. Chinese scholars(ex: 孫進己, 譚其?, 杜榮坤) who suggest 'Unified multinational State Theory' insist that 'the border/territory of Qing dynasty' as 'the historically stable and naturally stabilized traditional border/territory of China'. But, the border/territory of Qing dynasty is not 'the historically stable and naturally stabilized traditional border/territory of China'.
Thirdly, there are many differences between Liao-he Civilization(遼河文明)' and 'Hwang-he Civilization(黃河文明)'. On the basis of archeological evidences, we can suggest that the leader of 'Liao-he Civilization(遼河文明)' is not ancient Chinese people, but ancient Korean people.
In order to cope with a series of Chinese national projects on history, we need to, (1) reconsider the methodology and area of ancient history of Korea, (2) establish 'Northeast Asian Civilization(東北亞文明)' of our own that connects Manchuria(滿洲) and the Korean Peninsula, (3) prepare a new historical view based on mutual interchange and flow between neighboring countries.
But, 'Unified multinational State Theory' of China have many theoretical inconsistency and contradictions.
At first, the concept of 'Zhonghua race(中華民族)' that combines 55 minority races and 1 majority race into 'another 1 race' is not fit for use in science. That is a theoretical contradiction.
For example, USA has many kinds of minority races. We can not call all of them 'American race(美國民族)' but 'American or American people(美國人)'. In the same manner, in case of China we can not call 'Zhonghua race(中華民族)' but 'Chinese or Chinese people(中國人)'. So, the concept of 'Zhonghua race(中華民族), is a pure fiction that combines many kinds of different races into one race.
Secondly, the concept of 'the border/territory of China' that is frequently used in 'Unified multinational State Theory' is not fit for use in science. It is a very vague concept. Chinese scholars(ex: 孫進己, 譚其?, 杜榮坤) who suggest 'Unified multinational State Theory' insist that 'the border/territory of Qing dynasty' as 'the historically stable and naturally stabilized traditional border/territory of China'. But, the border/territory of Qing dynasty is not 'the historically stable and naturally stabilized traditional border/territory of China'.
Thirdly, there are many differences between Liao-he Civilization(遼河文明)' and 'Hwang-he Civilization(黃河文明)'. On the basis of archeological evidences, we can suggest that the leader of 'Liao-he Civilization(遼河文明)' is not ancient Chinese people, but ancient Korean people.
In order to cope with a series of Chinese national projects on history, we need to, (1) reconsider the methodology and area of ancient history of Korea, (2) establish 'Northeast Asian Civilization(東北亞文明)' of our own that connects Manchuria(滿洲) and the Korean Peninsula, (3) prepare a new historical view based on mutual interchange and flow between neighboring countries.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연구사 : ‘통일적다민족국가론‘의 등장과 3차의 대토론
Ⅲ. 중화인민공화국의 침탈논리와 이에 대한 비판
Ⅳ. 요약 및 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동북공정의 최종판 ‘요하문명론’
고조선단군학
2006 .12
-
‘통일적다민족국가론’의 전개와 적용
고구려연구회 학술총서
2008 .07
-
최근 중국의 역사관련 국가 공정들과 한국의 과제
고조선단군학
2005 .06
-
‘요하문명론’의 초기 전개 과정에 대한 연구
고조선단군학
2009 .11
-
개혁 개방 이후 중국의 역사교육과 ‘통일적 다민족국가’론
동북아역사논총
2005 .08
-
중국의 동북공정 상에 보이는 발해사 서술
아시아문화연구
2007 .05
-
중국 고대 문명 연구의 회고와 전망 : 중국의 고대 문명 역사공정에 대한 한국 학계의 대응을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2016 .09
-
중국 요하문명론의 전개와 의미
한국사학보
2013 .05
-
중국의 POST 東北工程과 고구려사 관련 동향 분석
한국사학보
2013 .05
-
한국 사회의 다민족화와 `다문화 열풍`의 위기
지식의 지평
2009 .11
-
중국 역사공정의 비판적 검토 : 하상주단대공정과 중화문명탐원공정을 중심으로
역사비평
2008 .02
-
홍산문화론 : 牛河梁 유적과 중국 초기 문명론을 중심으로
한국고대사연구
2014 .12
-
Western Perspectives on China’s Northeast Project (Dongbei Gongcheng)
동양학
2007 .01
-
중화인민공화국 동북공정 5년의 성과와 전망
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
중국의 東北工程과 高句麗史 인식체계의 변화
한국사연구
2004 .09
-
중화민족다원일체론의 등장과 동북공정의 논리적 모순
史叢(사총)
2012 .01
-
통일문학 방법론 서설
우리말글
2000 .12
-
복식과 제의로 본 고조선문명과 홍산문화
고조선단군학
2015 .06
-
『滿洲歷史地理』 제1권 제3편 三國時代의 滿洲
고구려발해연구
2013 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-019496476