지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Land rights have dual-sides of interests, i.e., individual interests and public interests. These interests are often confronted with each other. And land laws basically are to coordinate these conflicts. This paper is to review the dual-sides of land rights and to suggest the future directions of land laws to mitigate the landed conflicts.
The individual interests of landownership have rooted in the belief of so-called the sacred and inviolable property ownership, which were claimed in the French Declaration of Human Rights in 1789. Landownership had been regarded as one of the sacred and inviolable rights. This concept had been the cornerstone of the modern ownership, which have been reflected in the Constitution and Civil Law in most countries. Landownership, thus, have been accepted as a bundle of rights to pursue the whole interests in using, renting and disposing activities.
As modem society evolved, this concept of the sacred and inviolable landownership had been changed gradually. The ideas that ownership of landed property have to serve the increment of public welfare have spreaded widely. The tenet of the Germany's Weimar Constitution in 1919 have influenced the ideology of many other countries' Constitution, i.e., to protect private ownership and also to promote public interests. Many public burdens have been levied upon the landowners in order to increase the welfare of the whole society.
In fact land is naturally given to the whole society. Land has many unique characteristics which makes land different from other properties. It requires more publicity for the welfare of the whole society. Individual interests of landowner are restricted by land laws which impose of many regulations on the landowner. Conflicts between individual and public interests embedded in landownership are getting severe.
The urgent tasks in these days are how to harmonize these conflicts, i.e., how to coordinate the dual functions of protecting private interests in the one hand and increasing social welfare in the other. Land laws need to emphasize the publicity of land. Nevertheless, even if infringement on private ownership is inevitable for the public welfare, adequate rescue or compensation should be made, too.
The individual interests of landownership have rooted in the belief of so-called the sacred and inviolable property ownership, which were claimed in the French Declaration of Human Rights in 1789. Landownership had been regarded as one of the sacred and inviolable rights. This concept had been the cornerstone of the modern ownership, which have been reflected in the Constitution and Civil Law in most countries. Landownership, thus, have been accepted as a bundle of rights to pursue the whole interests in using, renting and disposing activities.
As modem society evolved, this concept of the sacred and inviolable landownership had been changed gradually. The ideas that ownership of landed property have to serve the increment of public welfare have spreaded widely. The tenet of the Germany's Weimar Constitution in 1919 have influenced the ideology of many other countries' Constitution, i.e., to protect private ownership and also to promote public interests. Many public burdens have been levied upon the landowners in order to increase the welfare of the whole society.
In fact land is naturally given to the whole society. Land has many unique characteristics which makes land different from other properties. It requires more publicity for the welfare of the whole society. Individual interests of landowner are restricted by land laws which impose of many regulations on the landowner. Conflicts between individual and public interests embedded in landownership are getting severe.
The urgent tasks in these days are how to harmonize these conflicts, i.e., how to coordinate the dual functions of protecting private interests in the one hand and increasing social welfare in the other. Land laws need to emphasize the publicity of land. Nevertheless, even if infringement on private ownership is inevitable for the public welfare, adequate rescue or compensation should be made, too.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 토지의 사적 이익을 위한 소유권의 전개
Ⅲ. 토지의 사회적 이익을 위한 토지소유의 변천
Ⅳ. 토지에 대한 사회적 이익의 근거와 공공성ㆍ사회성의 강화
Ⅴ. 토지의 사적 이익과 사회적 이익의 대립과 조정
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
中國 會社法上 土地使用權 出資에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2003 .09
-
중국 토지사용권 출량에 관한 법률적 검토
재산법연구
2004 .01
-
토지공개념제 재정립을 위한 법적 검토 : 토지초과이득세제 재도입을 중심으로
법학연구
2009 .05
-
中國土地所有權의 法律制度에 대한 考察
동아법학
2009 .08
-
대단위 토지개발사업 시행을 위한 대토보상제 도입방안 연구
도시행정학보
2007 .12
-
통일후 북한토지의 소유권 문제
한양법학
2013 .02
-
중국의 토지사용권 유형에 관한 연구－중국 물권법의 용익물권편 규정을 중심으로－
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
토지이용규제 합리화 방안 연구
경기연구원 기본연구
2009 .11
-
우리나라 지역별 산업토지수요 예측에 관한 연구
도시행정학보
2010 .10
-
미국의 농지적성평가방법과 그의 정책적 시사점 고찰
국토연구
2001 .10
-
토지관련 법령정보화 수요분석과 대응전략
국토연구
2001 .10
-
혁명시기 중국의 토지행정법제 연구
행정법연구
2008 .12
-
보전적 토지이용에 근거한 개발가능지의 규모설정 : 경기도접경지역의사례를중심으로
경기논단
2002 .06
-
에티오피아의 토지 보유 체계와 토지 정책
한국아프리카학회지
2015 .06
-
농지처분명령 운용실태와 개선과제
한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고
2011 .12
-
Land Policy and Land Value Taxation
한국행정논집
1993 .12
-
통일이후 북한의 토지소유권 처리방안 연구
한국지적정보학회지
2006 .12
-
关于中国农村土地问题的探究 : 以农村宅基地为中心
한국동북아논총
2015 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-322-019444382