지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2002.9
- 수록면
- 257 - 282 (29page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article takes up deterritorialization of culture as a current issue of Korean studies, and attempts to search for ways to deal with the deterritorialization of Korean culture in an anthropological perspective. It starts with the question of whether Korean culture is deterritorialized. To answer this question, first the social discourse of "one nation, one people" which makes Korean culture univocal is discussed. And the way in which Korean culture has been conceptualized and analyzed in Korean anthropology and Korean studies is also examined. In its social discourse and academic production, Korean culture has been considered as an unique, concrete entity of value system shared by Koreans in Korean peninsula. This, in fact, should be understood as ideological manifestations rather than the current state of Korean culture.
To deal with the deterritorailizing Korean culture, the anthropological discussions about field work and the theoretical discussions of postmodern anthropologists is explored. In American anthropology, field work, the traditional research method of anthropology, has become problematic as the distance between the field and home has been reduced and the cultural boundary between the field and home has become blurred in the process of globalization. Diasporal, postcolonial, and native anthropologists are asserting the reconceptualization of the field and the field work method.
Some of American postmodern anthropologists have also noticed the current state of cultures, and have sought the ways to deal with new cultural sites, such as public culture, interstitial zones and borderlands. They have tried to deconstruct the way in which anthropologists have produced the knowledge of cultures and redefine the relationship between anthropologists and natives. As one of their endeavors, multi-sited ethnography has been proposed to cope with the mobile state of people, symbols, stories, etc..
From the discussion above, it seems necessary to redefine the field in the study of Korean culture by looking at the borderlands created by the place-making of foreign laborers, North Koreans and others. It is also urgent to reinvent the methods to cope with new subject matters in the study of Korean culture. Especially, field work method needs to be revised depending on the new cultural sites. Lastly, it seems appropriate to clarify the anthropological production of knowledge about Korean culture, especially for native anthropologists and Koreanists since studying our own culture also involves power-knowledge system.
To deal with the deterritorailizing Korean culture, the anthropological discussions about field work and the theoretical discussions of postmodern anthropologists is explored. In American anthropology, field work, the traditional research method of anthropology, has become problematic as the distance between the field and home has been reduced and the cultural boundary between the field and home has become blurred in the process of globalization. Diasporal, postcolonial, and native anthropologists are asserting the reconceptualization of the field and the field work method.
Some of American postmodern anthropologists have also noticed the current state of cultures, and have sought the ways to deal with new cultural sites, such as public culture, interstitial zones and borderlands. They have tried to deconstruct the way in which anthropologists have produced the knowledge of cultures and redefine the relationship between anthropologists and natives. As one of their endeavors, multi-sited ethnography has been proposed to cope with the mobile state of people, symbols, stories, etc..
From the discussion above, it seems necessary to redefine the field in the study of Korean culture by looking at the borderlands created by the place-making of foreign laborers, North Koreans and others. It is also urgent to reinvent the methods to cope with new subject matters in the study of Korean culture. Especially, field work method needs to be revised depending on the new cultural sites. Lastly, it seems appropriate to clarify the anthropological production of knowledge about Korean culture, especially for native anthropologists and Koreanists since studying our own culture also involves power-knowledge system.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기: 현대 문화의 탈지역화를 어떻게 다룰 것인가.
Ⅱ. 한국문화는 탈지역화하고 있는가
Ⅲ. 그러면 문화를 어떻게 연구할 것인가: 탈지역화된 문화 연구방법 모색
Ⅳ. 탈지역화하는 한국문화 연구의 과제
Ⅴ. 한국문화연구 방법의 재창출을 향하여
참고문헌
English Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .03
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .04
-
Characteristics of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1963 .06
-
한국학 연구방법의 모색 : 문화기술지적 방법(ethnographic method)을 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2003 .03
-
해외 거주 한국어 초급 학습자 대상 한국 문화 교육 방안 연구
이중언어학
2014 .01
-
한국 문화 교사 교육과정 개발을 위한 기초 연구
이중언어학
2013 .01
-
What Is Korean Culture Anyway? : A Critical Review
Korea Journal
2003 .03
-
조지훈의 민족문화 인식 방법과 그 내용
한국시학연구
2008 .12
-
한국어능력시험에서의 한국 문화 내용 - 제11회부터 제21회를 중심으로 -
언어사실과 관점
2012 .01
-
Exploring Korean Culture through Korean English
Korea Journal
1990 .12
-
A Note on Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1977 .04
-
한국어 문화 교재의 개발 영역과 문화 교육 모형의 개발
다문화와 평화
2013 .01
-
다문화담론과 로컬리티의 이원성
로컬리티 인문학
2010 .04
-
초등 3학년 영어교과서 문화 분석 및 체험중심 문화지도 방안 제언
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
문화 속의 우리와 타자 - 문화의 지역성과 세계성
철학연구
2003 .08
-
한국학생들의 미국문화에 관한 인식과 실제
인문학연구
2012 .12
-
2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 영어 교과서의 문화 내용 분석
언어과학연구
2020 .09
-
재미동포 한국어 학습자를 위한 한국어‧문화 교육 방안-프로젝트 수업을 활용하여-
이중언어학
2015 .01
-
한국어 교재에 나타난 문화교육 내용에 관한 연구
어문론집
2013 .03
-
중국인 유학생(한족-조선족)의 한국문화 수용실태 비교연구
중국학논총
2013 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
전쟁과 전후의 역사 속에서 여성의 삶과 경험을 역사화하기 : 이재경･윤택림･조영주 외(2013),『여성(들)이 기억하는 전쟁과 분단』, 아르케.
안태윤
한국여성학
2014
.03
문화연구를 위한 제언: 현장연구와 민속지학적 상상력을 재점화하기 : 조은과 조옥라의 《도시빈민의 삶과 공간: 사당동 재개발지역 현장연구》의 사례를 매개로
이기형
,
임도경
언론과 사회
2007
.11
구술사와 치유 : 트라우마 치유의 가능성을 모색하며
김귀옥
통일인문학
2013
.05
구술사 인터뷰와 역사적 상흔 : 진실 찾기와 치유의 가능성
윤택림
인문과학연구
2011
.09
그러므로 문제는 문학이다 : 최근 문화연구에 대한 비판적 제언 몇 가지
류보선
돈암어문학
2017
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-002101183