메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한림대학교 법학연구소 한림법학 FORUM 한림법학 FORUM 제19권
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
163 - 199 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to understand the structure of actors involved in the increase of the number of lawyers in Korea. For this research, the Canadian Scholar’s Policy Network Approach and the Sabatier’s Advocacy Coalition Concept were used. The case analysis focuses on the policy decisions related to the number of people passing the bar examination. This paper reviewed the policy debates, initiatives and actions of actors concerned before and during the 1995 legal reform process. The research result is as follows: The Supreme Court, the prosecution and the national bar association have been a very powerful and very organized policy community affecting the issues mentioned. As a sub-government, they have played a key role in deciding the number of lawyers in the country. They have effectively prevented the issues affecting their interests from being policy agenda. However, the law professors’ associations and civic groups remained as an attentive public. A policy network highly represented by the lawyers’ community, which appears to be clientele oriented, existed for a long time. However, during the reform, the structure of the policy network changed a lot. As the presidential office initiated the reform, the attentive public participated in the core policy making process. In relation to this, the network changed from clientele oriented to a cooperative one. In addition, there was policy learning between the groups. Policy makers must realize that it is necessary to collaborate with the attentive public and at the same time change the structure of the policy network. This is to modify the policy which has been unchanged because of the existence of the strong policy community. This paper also proves that the irregular policy making process, such as reform, could be more effective and that policy learning is very important for the policy change.

목차

1. 서론
2. 정책네트워크 접근법과 분석틀
3. 95년 이전까지의 정책행위자 관계
4. 95년 증원결정 과정에서의 정책 행위자 관계
5. 결론
【참고문헌】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0