지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to suggest that 'give' in English is also a prototypical ditransitive verb and possesses higher semantic transitivity compared with other trivalent verbs.
To prove this, this study argues that the syntactic anomaly associated with 'give' can be explained by its higher degree of semantic transitivity. In transitive clauses, semantic and syntactic transitivity usually agree, which means that semantically highly transitive events are usually encoded by syntactically transitive constructions. To measure the gradable transitivity in ditransitives, this study suggests four transitive semantic features and analyzes three-participant events with them in order to see which clauses can be ranked as more or less transitive. As the result of it, it is suggested that the four semantic features can be a scale measuring the degree of ditransitive transitivity. The four semantic features suggested are as follows. 1) The completeness of events, 2) the recipient as a volitional undergoer, 3) three participants with maximally distinct semantic roles, 4) the inseparability of events. All of these four semantic features must be satisfied with the animacy condition.
This study shows that 'give' is crosslinguistically by far the most typical ditransitive verb and this is why 'give' is syntactically anomalous compared with other dative verbs.
To prove this, this study argues that the syntactic anomaly associated with 'give' can be explained by its higher degree of semantic transitivity. In transitive clauses, semantic and syntactic transitivity usually agree, which means that semantically highly transitive events are usually encoded by syntactically transitive constructions. To measure the gradable transitivity in ditransitives, this study suggests four transitive semantic features and analyzes three-participant events with them in order to see which clauses can be ranked as more or less transitive. As the result of it, it is suggested that the four semantic features can be a scale measuring the degree of ditransitive transitivity. The four semantic features suggested are as follows. 1) The completeness of events, 2) the recipient as a volitional undergoer, 3) three participants with maximally distinct semantic roles, 4) the inseparability of events. All of these four semantic features must be satisfied with the animacy condition.
This study shows that 'give' is crosslinguistically by far the most typical ditransitive verb and this is why 'give' is syntactically anomalous compared with other dative verbs.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 등급적 타동성
Ⅲ. 등급적 타동성의 의미자질들
Ⅳ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Baker,Mark C / 1997 / Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. in:Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax / Kluwer : 73 ~ 137
2. [단행본] - Barðdal, Jóhanna / 2001 / Case in Icelandic -A Synchronic, Diachronic, and Comparative Approach / Department of Scandinavian Language, Lund University.
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Delancy,Scott / 1984 / Notes on Agentivity and Causation / Studies in Language 8 : 181 ~ 213
4. [단행본] - Givón,Talmy / 1984 / Direct Object and Dative Shift: Semantic and Pragmatic Case. in:Objects: Toward a Theory of Grammatical Relations / Academic Press : 151 ~ 182
5. [단행본] - Givón,Talmy / 1995 / Functionalism and Grammar / John Benjamins
2. [단행본] - Barðdal, Jóhanna / 2001 / Case in Icelandic -A Synchronic, Diachronic, and Comparative Approach / Department of Scandinavian Language, Lund University.
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Delancy,Scott / 1984 / Notes on Agentivity and Causation / Studies in Language 8 : 181 ~ 213
4. [단행본] - Givón,Talmy / 1984 / Direct Object and Dative Shift: Semantic and Pragmatic Case. in:Objects: Toward a Theory of Grammatical Relations / Academic Press : 151 ~ 182
5. [단행본] - Givón,Talmy / 1995 / Functionalism and Grammar / John Benjamins
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
L2 Learners’ Sensitivity to the Transitivity Bias Continuum in English Verbs
언어학
2020 .04
-
탈타동성과 한국어
한국어학
2016 .11
-
Toward a Ditransitive Prototype: The Gradience of English Ditransitives
영어학연구
2014 .01
-
한국어의 타동성 발현 양상 분석
돈암어문학
2020 .06
-
빈어수반 일음절 형용사 서술어구의 타동성
중국어문학논집
2014 .08
-
Transitivity and Case Assignment in Ígálâ
Journal of Universal Language
2020 .03
-
Relative Transitivity of the English Reflexive Construction
신영어영문학
2016 .02
-
On the Passivizability of Benefactive Ditransitives
언어
2014 .06
-
청문회 신문 상황에서의 행위성 표현 : 동사 선택, 의미적 역할, 타동성의 담화ㆍ화용적 측면
담화와인지
2006 .04
-
영어 서술 형용사 구문에 내재된 타동성의 정도성
언어학 연구
2018 .07
-
Learnability of English Transitivity Alternations for Korean EFL Learners
응용언어학
2007 .12
-
The Semantic Approach to Agentivity, Transitivity, and Causativity
언어
1990 .12
-
국어의 목적어를 어떻게 정의해야 하는가? : 유형론의 관점, 서술어의 타동성에 의한 목적어 정의
한국어학
2015 .08
-
‘타동성’의 문법 교육적 위상 정립을 위한 시론
국어국문학
2016 .03
-
The Degree of Transitivity in Korean : A Functional-Typological Approach
어학연구
1993 .03
-
A Study on Subject Selection and Transitivity in English
언어학 연구
2017 .10
-
“靠近”的词性词义探究
중국어문논역총간
2019 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0