지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
First of all, the business act which lets ‘a formal barkeeper’ represent a bar is permitted legally. This is because the business permission to a bar is what is called “Sachgenehmigung” in the light of provision that allows free trade with business. Namely, it is the permission not according to informations about a person but according to situation about a place of business and facility. Nevertheless, considering the intention which stands the formal barkeeper, it IS necessary not to abandon the control and regulation of that kinds of business. Currently to examine a tax evasion is applied widely as the method of regulation, and it will be also able to punish the actual business owner for the various law violation act on the business.
However it is emphasized in this paper specially that we should cope more radically with the problem of the formal barkeeper made by the actual business owner who has dis qualification provided by the law. If this case would be dealed as a simple one of a formal barkeeper, provisions of the disqualification had no meaning.
In the case like this, that business permission to the superficial applicant should be canceled by official authority. But though the effect of permisson cancel can retroacts, the business act before cancel can not be punished for business without permission because of ‘nulla poena sine lege’. Futhermore to deal this as a obstruction of the performance of official duties with fraud needs more consideration. Consequently as long as it needs to punish that kinds of business owner, lawmaker should set provisions that if a man who has disqualification on a law takes a business permission from authority with fraud, he should be punished like the road traffic law.
After all, the settlement of legal order can be conducted by observance from majority and by control against minority who violates law. The Problem of the formal barkeeper is evaluated that it is spread more and more, so we should cope with these behaviors by new legislation before consciousness of law observance becomes more weak.
However it is emphasized in this paper specially that we should cope more radically with the problem of the formal barkeeper made by the actual business owner who has dis qualification provided by the law. If this case would be dealed as a simple one of a formal barkeeper, provisions of the disqualification had no meaning.
In the case like this, that business permission to the superficial applicant should be canceled by official authority. But though the effect of permisson cancel can retroacts, the business act before cancel can not be punished for business without permission because of ‘nulla poena sine lege’. Futhermore to deal this as a obstruction of the performance of official duties with fraud needs more consideration. Consequently as long as it needs to punish that kinds of business owner, lawmaker should set provisions that if a man who has disqualification on a law takes a business permission from authority with fraud, he should be punished like the road traffic law.
After all, the settlement of legal order can be conducted by observance from majority and by control against minority who violates law. The Problem of the formal barkeeper is evaluated that it is spread more and more, so we should cope with these behaviors by new legislation before consciousness of law observance becomes more weak.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 바지사장의 법적 개념과 논의의 전개방향
Ⅲ. 바지사장 영업허가의 효력범위
Ⅳ. 인적결격사유자가 바지사장을 내세운 경우
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 행정허가법의 내용과 평가
공법학연구
2004 .12
-
WHAT IS LAW
저스티스
1965 .04
-
한국인의 법의식과 준법운동의 방향
법학연구
2002 .12
-
사장님, 사장님, 우리 사장님
벤처다이제스트
2008 .01
-
국민건강보험법상 요양급여비용 환수 및 처벌 관련 규정의 문제점과 개선방안
법학연구
2009 .12
-
신용장 거래에 있어서 중국의 사기예외 적용규정에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2008 .02
-
운전면허 행정처분의 기준과 절차의 문제점과 개선방안
행정법연구
2011 .04
-
Analysis of Fraud in a Chinese Business Review Website
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2017 .10
-
명의신탁 부동산을 임의처분한 명의수탁자의 형사책임에 관한 비판적 고찰 : 판례를 중심으로
강원법학
2012 .10
-
한·중 환경기본법 비교 : 중국의 「환경보호법」을 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .08
-
주식명의신탁과 주주명부 -대법원 2013. 2. 14. 선고 2011다109708 판결을 중심으로-
법학평론
2020 .04
-
법의 효력과 형법의 장소적 효력범위 -북한지역이 형법의 효력이 미치는 영역에 속하는지를 중심으로-
법철학연구
2018 .08
-
충남대학교 법학전문대학원의 민법 교육과정 및 교육방법
법학연구
2008 .12
-
貨煥信用狀에서 詐欺除外法則(Fraud Exception Rule)이 개설신청인이나 제3당사자의 사기에도 적용되는가?
무역학회지
2004 .04
-
로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
미국 상사법의 개별입법화 동향
기업법연구
2009 .12
-
화환신용장에서의 ‘Fraud Rule’의 적용기준과 유형에 관한 연구
문화산업연구
2004 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0