지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Independent regulatory agencies have the following characteristics; quasi-judicial procedures, independence and commission system. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission(FTC) is one of the representative independent regulatory agencies enforcing antitrust laws in the United States.
The FTC is composed of five Commissioners, who are appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. Not more than three of the Commissioners shall be members of the same political party. The first Commissioners hold their positions for terms of three, four, five, six and seven years and their successors hold their positions for terms of seven years. The FTC has staffs to investigate cases and analyse legal and economic issues, many of whom have lawyer certificates or economic doctorate degrees.
The FTC has been criticised for the combination of the prosecutorial function and judicial function because it can hinder fairness. There have been pros and cons from various grounds. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the combination is not against the due process in the Constitution because the FTC was established for accumulating expertises in the course of investigating the industries and deciding cases.
The FTC investigates cases only for public goods, not for private interests. The investigation is divided into two phases; Initial Phase Investigation and Full Phase Investigation. Initial Phase Investigation is based on voluntary cooperation of corporations. However, during Full Phase Investigation, compulsory measurements can be used such as like subpoena or Civil Investigative Demand(CID). The adjudicative hearings are held by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ), who is independent from the FTC and makes initial decision. The procedures are much similar to the U.S federal civil judicial procedure. The Commission can review the case by the protests from respondents or FTC attorneys or ex officio.
In this article, the ways for improvement of matter processing procedures in independent regulatory agencies in South Korea are explored centered on the Korea Fair Trade Commission, the counterpart of United States Federal Trade Commission.
Firstly, we need to complement and strengthen quasi-judicial procedures for the respondents. Secondly, the efficiency of the agencies has to be enhanced. Thirdly, settlement like consent order in the U.S. FTC needs to be considered for introduction. Fourthly, independence of independent regulatory agencies and the Commissioners has to be strengthened. Finally, private actions have to be activated more.
The FTC is composed of five Commissioners, who are appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. Not more than three of the Commissioners shall be members of the same political party. The first Commissioners hold their positions for terms of three, four, five, six and seven years and their successors hold their positions for terms of seven years. The FTC has staffs to investigate cases and analyse legal and economic issues, many of whom have lawyer certificates or economic doctorate degrees.
The FTC has been criticised for the combination of the prosecutorial function and judicial function because it can hinder fairness. There have been pros and cons from various grounds. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the combination is not against the due process in the Constitution because the FTC was established for accumulating expertises in the course of investigating the industries and deciding cases.
The FTC investigates cases only for public goods, not for private interests. The investigation is divided into two phases; Initial Phase Investigation and Full Phase Investigation. Initial Phase Investigation is based on voluntary cooperation of corporations. However, during Full Phase Investigation, compulsory measurements can be used such as like subpoena or Civil Investigative Demand(CID). The adjudicative hearings are held by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ), who is independent from the FTC and makes initial decision. The procedures are much similar to the U.S federal civil judicial procedure. The Commission can review the case by the protests from respondents or FTC attorneys or ex officio.
In this article, the ways for improvement of matter processing procedures in independent regulatory agencies in South Korea are explored centered on the Korea Fair Trade Commission, the counterpart of United States Federal Trade Commission.
Firstly, we need to complement and strengthen quasi-judicial procedures for the respondents. Secondly, the efficiency of the agencies has to be enhanced. Thirdly, settlement like consent order in the U.S. FTC needs to be considered for introduction. Fourthly, independence of independent regulatory agencies and the Commissioners has to be strengthened. Finally, private actions have to be activated more.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 독립규제기관의 특성
Ⅲ. 미국 연방거래위원회(FTC)의 조직
Ⅳ. 미국 연방거래위원회의 사건처리절차
Ⅴ. 우리나라 독립규제기관의 사건처리절차의 문제점과 개선방안: 공정거래위원회를 중심으로
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Consumer Law in the United States : FTC and Consumer Protection
비교사법
2008 .06
-
공정거래위원회의 디지털증거 수집의 적법성 강화 방안
경쟁법연구
2019 .01
-
FTC Regulation with the Case of Comparative Advertising from 1972 through 2006
광고PR실학연구
2011 .01
-
6ㆍ25전쟁 시 야전훈련사령부(FTC)의 창설과 역할
군사
2014 .06
-
공정거래위원회의 성장에 대한 분석
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .08
-
미국 연방거래위원회(FTC)의 법집행방식에 관한 연구
法學論文集
2019 .01
-
공정거래위원회의 구성과 권한 및 불복구조에 대한 개선방안의 얼개
법학평론
2020 .04
-
외국 사업자의 약관에 대한 심사 및 집행
경쟁법연구
2020 .01
-
소비자 보호에 대한 미국법의 시각
동아법학
2010 .02
-
미국 연방거래위원회법 제5조에 의한 소비자 개인정보 보호－ 자율규제에 의한 소비자 개인정보 보호의 안전장치 －
경영법률
2016 .01
-
【미국】FTC, 공유경제와 소비자보호 워크샵 개최
소비자정책동향
2015 .05
-
한국과 미국의 광고규제 비교고찰 : 미국의 FTC법과 우리나라의 공정거래법을 중심으로
광고연구
1995 .02
-
전자상거래에 대한 영·미 경쟁정책 당국의 대응
규제연구
2002 .06
-
공정거래위원회의 전속고발권 존폐론의 검토
형사법연구
2011 .01
-
광고실증제와 부당광고의 규제 : 미국 FTC의 사례를 중심으로
광고연구
1999 .03
-
표준특허의 기회주의적 행사와 미국 反트러스트법 및 연방거래위원회법 제5조 부활의 기미
서강법학
2009 .12
-
[미국] FTC, 기만적 녹색인증 씰(Seals)에 대해 경고
소비자정책동향
2015 .09
-
공정거래법상 동의명령제 도입방안 연구
비교사법
2009 .12
-
합리적 선택 관료제 구조 이론의 적용을 통한 정부출연기관 감독권 이양에 대한 분석 : 한국소비자보호원을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2006 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Consumer Law in the United States : FTC and Consumer Protection
Vincent
,
Joseph
비교사법
2008
.06
미국 FTC ‘2007 소비자 사기 및 명의도용 민원보고서’의 주요 내용 및 시사점
배순영
소비자정책동향
2008
.04
표시ㆍ광고의 공정화에 관한 법률상의 광고실증제에 관한 연구
손수진
한양법학
1999
.12
허위·과장의 비교광고에 대한 경쟁자의 손해배상청구권의 성립요건에 대한 비교법적 검토
민성철
저스티스
2011
.04
행정조사기본법의 문제점과 개선방안
김영조
공법학연구
2007
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0