메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 아세아문제연구원 아세아연구 아세아연구 통권 135호
발행연도
2009.3
수록면
13 - 56 (46page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The conception of China exists within the discourse on East Asia, but does ‘East Asia’ matter to China? That is, is ‘East Asia’ a definable entity? Or does it have an epistemological value? Traditionally, the discourse on East Asia did not flourish in China, but with the growing discussions on issues such as ‘Confucianism,’ ‘modernization,’ and ‘war wounds and memory,’ East Asia came to be one of the valid discourses which is now regarded as an organically unified entity. The discourse on East Asia in three different regions-China, Japan and Korea- however, exhibits geographical imbalance and tensions. It indicates that the discourse was constructed as a unified entity based on logic, but its epistemological and realistic foundation is still unstable. This explains why the discourse on East Asia is turning into an abstraction despite its realistic significance.
In order to move away from abstraction, the discourse on East Asia has to be understood within the historical context of the cold war and the post-cold war. It is also imperative to consider the political climate outside East Asia. The cold war itself has come to an end, but its ideology still continues to govern throughout East Asia at large. For example, American military bases serve as representative remnants of the cold war, while Russian interests to intervene in the region are clearly demonstrated by the publications such as Issues in the East Asia.
The obstacles of the discourse on East Asia can only be overcome by such historical contextualization. The obstacles that I address here are issues such as abstraction of problems, its unconfirmed epistemological value and exclusion of regions ranging from Taiwan and North Korea to Mongolia and Southeast Asia. When these obstacles are tackled, we can then realistically hope for the emergence of the discourse on East Asia that goes beyond the boundaries of nation-states and offers a cognitively open and unified paradigm.

목차

Ⅰ. 중국사회의 기존 동아시아 시각 및 그 문제성
Ⅱ. 현대사의 역사과정에서 나타난 동아시아 내부의 불균형 상태
Ⅲ. 냉전의 역사와 동아시아의 관계
Ⅳ. 포스트 냉전 시기의 역사시야와 동아시아 서사의 사상 품격
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (10)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0