메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교역사연구소 한국기독교와 역사 한국기독교와 역사 제22호
발행연도
2005.3
수록면
129 - 157 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Before embodying the academic, artistic, and historic meanings of modem cultural properties, I analyze the report of list of modem cultural properties, filed by 13 municipalities and local capitals' administrative offices, and the data of Cultural Heritage Administration. On basis of analysis I categorize the results into two parts, which is the present conditions of modem cultural properties and the designation states as modem cultural properties, and those categories are particularly seen by religious architectures.
When we start to think of modern cultural properties as legacy, we confront the most primal question of what the modem cultural properties are. And the answer would be found on the precise distinction of the “modem period” in Korean history. There are many types of modem cultural properties and among them I picked the religious architectures. In searching religious architectures, I put the modern period of Korean history from the start of western civilization invasion to 1960. Although my research is conducted inside of this time span as modem period, it would be persuasive to say that the architectural modem period is limited until the Korean independence, for˙ the modem period in Korea was concluded along with the Korean independence and right after that there came contemporary period. However, it would be very unreasonable to say that we must include 1960 and 1970 as modem period of modem architectural studies, for the architectures, built after independence and these times, also have modem aspects and features. The modem features in architectures would be endlessly found in the upcoming period of time.
While I analyzing modem religious architectures, there found many inconsistencies in naming the architectures. For example, among Roman Catholic Churches, some were listed as “Roman Catholic Church (Cheonju-Kyohoei),” whereas others were listed as “Catholic Church (Seung-dang).” And I think we need to keep consistency in naming the properties of religious architectures. The Episcopal Church’s names in list also showed inconsistency, likewise some were listed “the Episcopal Church” titles before the local names, and others were listed “the Episcopal Church” after the local names. And so I think we need to show consistency in naming “the Episcopal Church” architectures. As the two major modern religions in Korea, the Roman Catholic Church and the Episcopal Church example requires us to investigate into the designations of cultural properties, not only other religious properties, but also the other cultural properties.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 근대와 근대문화유산
3. 근대종교건축의 현황
4. 근대종교건축의 문화재 지정과 등록
5. 맺음말
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0