메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교역사연구소 한국기독교와 역사 한국기독교와 역사 제14호
발행연도
2001.2
수록면
107 - 144 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On June 25, 1950, war broke out between North Korea and South Korea, a country which had been divided since 1945. The United Nation's Security Council branded the North Korea as aggressor and authorized the decisive action of armed intervention to repel the aggressor. Two weeks later, World Council of Churches approved, through the statement of its Central Committee held in Toronto, of the police action of the United Nation. The statement has been criticized from some of member churches of the World Council of Churches, and has been judged to have taken sides in the Cold War especially by member churches from socialist countries. This essay examined the Korean War controversy caused by the Toronto statement to understand how World Council of Churches and its member churches reacted to the Korean War in the ideological setting of the Cold War.
Churches in Eastern Europe and China responded to the Toronto statement quickly. Joseph L. Hromadka, Dean of the Comenius Faculty in Prague, and Bishop Albert Bereczky of the Reformed Church in Hungary were among those had vigorously attacked the Toronto statement, saying that the World Council of Churches identified itself with one group of great powers. The Chinese Churches issued a statement saying that the Toronto statement distorted truth, and echoed the voice of the United States. The United Nations action in Korea, however, received the Federal Council of Churches of Christ and Catholic support in America because it was carried out legally under the United Nations. Most of the denominations took a position similar to that of the Federal Council of Churches. In this situation, World Council of Churches tried to answer the denunciations of Toronto statement in such a way as to insist that it had not identified itself with any bloc of nations against other nations! and had no such intention.

목차

Ⅰ. 세계교회협의회의 한국전쟁 성명
Ⅱ. 세계교회협의 회 성명에 대한 반응
Ⅲ. 세계교회협의회의 해명
Ⅳ. 결론
Abstracts

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0