메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 32호
발행연도
2007.7
수록면
127 - 160 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Representation aesthetics has been recognized with an essential theory of the art since Aristotle had adopted mimesis as a method of the art. Artists have endeavored for the transparent representation in every era. But a crack broke out in the myth of the representation with the invention of the photography and the cinema. The supreme transparency of the new media induced a new perspective for the representation aesthetics, which had dominated the art world.
The art derived from the representation stood on the crossroad of changing direction. Modernism aesthetics wanted to search for the self-referentiality in order to the replacement of the only principal that has been recognized for the universality. Cubism made up the chink of representation with relativity of the truth and Abstract Expressionism entered into the world of the image and Nonrepresentationalism instead of the mimesis. Surrealism also constructed his own empire with association of ideas and automatism beyond the logos that we could perceive. But the deconstructed representation by modernism and avant-garde still sustained its life in the cinema.
Many spectators in the theater sought for the stability through the transparency of the representation. Identification that the effect of the representation created was the only comfort to the people who were tired by the labor in the time of industry. Notwithstanding, critics blamed the identification for its stance of non-resistance and the absence of criticism. Classical narrative cinemas are considered as a special mechanism, which poured the dominant ideology into the spectators.
The sprit of the liberation and revolution in 1960's looked out for an alternative ideology. Brecht was an optimum artist from poststructuralist's point of view. They fixed their eyes on alienation effect of Brecht. Against aesthetics of Aristotle, the purposes of epic theatre was disjointing identification effect, which made for a special ideology and awakening the audience. For this reason Brecht's epic theatre was considered as the only method which could deconstruct the dominant ideology.
With the political and aesthetical backing, Jean-Luc Godard, another name of French Nouvelle Vague took advantaged of Brecht's theory. Godard exposed his production process and spoke to the spectators. He made some distance between cinema and them through those methods. Heterogeneous elements of creation and criticism were integrated in His cinema; also his self-reflexive Meta art theory opened a path for political cinema. now, a method of self-reflexive cinema aesthetics supplies a critical point of view for the artists who want to put into justification in their works.

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 자기 반영의 미적 동기
3. 자기 반영적 사유: 낯설게 하기의 전략
4. 다양한 자기 반영의 전략들
5. 나가며
참고 문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0