메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제48권 제4호
발행연도
2006.11
수록면
121 - 144 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Magus, John Fowles's the second novel, was published in 1965. Although second in terms of publication date, the novel had been reworked since the early 1950s. Many critics and reviewers were so disturbed by the labyrinthine complexity of The Magus, such as the mazes of the godgame, the multiple identities of its dramatis personae, and the ambiguous nature of each vision of "reality" devised by Maurice Conchis. This paper was to examine the original title of The Godgame as a metaphor for existence as well as a paradigm for the texts of both fiction and life.
In Fowles's philosophy, God, like a novelist, disappears once he has created his text (the universe) and leaves his reader (humanity) to work out what is going on, or whether He even exists. In The Magus, Fowles devised a structural metaphor, the "godgame," to illustrate this apparent paradox. He created, in the imposing figure of Conchis, an author who "plays" god but ultimately denies his omniscience.
Godgame is also a paradigm for the texts of both fiction and life. At the center of this microcosm is the elusive Conchis-magus, author, and god. Hence every phase of the Godgame is designed to reflect those fictions that have imprisoned Nicholas in the decadent genre his narcissism has appropriated, while preparing him for the genre he has yet to confront, yet to create-that of reality. Each aspect of this meta-drama mirrors and mocks not only Nicholas's foibles, but those of an entire generation as well.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0