지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A Central question imposed with the Minimalist Program is this: how perfect is the computational component of human linguistic system(C<SUB>HL</SUB>)? Perfection, in one sense, means that C<SUB>HL</SUB> is the minimal structure imposed by the structure of external interface systems. This means that there are no-interpretable features in the output of C<SUB>HL</SUB> because -interpretable features are not motivated by external interface system. So their existence is surprising if C<SUB>HL</SUB> is perfect in the above sense. Still it is widely assumed that -interpretable features such as the Ø -features of TP, VP and PRT and EPP do exist and furthermore that they must be eliminated in the derivation. In this paper I try to show that a EPP feature is not motivated properly as one of the uninterpretable features and is reducible to the distinction of the full Ø -feature of finite TP and the partial Ø feature of non-finite TP.
Adopting Chomsky(l998,1999)'s framework except an EPP feature, I show that the full- Ø feature of TP, which is composed of the person, number and gender, should be filled with an argument in its specifier due to its person feature in it because only the person feature is believed to be realized as a null morpheme in the computation. Hence the partial Ø -feature of TP, composed of the number, gender feature without the person feature, do not have any reason to be filled with an argument in that there is no person feature(null morpheme) in it.
Based on this syntactic phenomena I show that much linguistic phenomena explained previously by an EPP feature can also be explained nicely in other way. Finally I would like to show that an EPP feature do not have any reason empirically necessary.
Adopting Chomsky(l998,1999)'s framework except an EPP feature, I show that the full- Ø feature of TP, which is composed of the person, number and gender, should be filled with an argument in its specifier due to its person feature in it because only the person feature is believed to be realized as a null morpheme in the computation. Hence the partial Ø -feature of TP, composed of the number, gender feature without the person feature, do not have any reason to be filled with an argument in that there is no person feature(null morpheme) in it.
Based on this syntactic phenomena I show that much linguistic phenomena explained previously by an EPP feature can also be explained nicely in other way. Finally I would like to show that an EPP feature do not have any reason empirically necessary.
목차
1. 서론
2. 비 해석 자질 EPP
3. 인칭자질과 Ø 자질
4. 결론
Reference
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Person Feature against EPP features
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2000 .05
-
I hope not에 나타난 부정어 not의 본질에 대하여
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
Edge Feature의 필요성과 EPP Feature의 위상
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
허사 there 구문에서의 EPP
생성문법연구
2002 .01
-
한국어 자음에서 변별 자질들의 지각적 위계
말소리와 음성과학
2010 .12
-
허사 there와 결함 T의 일치관계
영어영문학21
2008 .01
-
T와 V의 격자질과 CP의 분포
언어과학연구
1996 .12
-
일치와 이동
영어학
2001 .12
-
허사 there의 자질(features)
영어영문학연구
2002 .01
-
A Phase Inheritance-based Account on A’-extraction of Double Object Constructions
언어
2014 .03
-
보문자(C) 자질과 That-흔적 효과
새한영어영문학
2003 .11
-
Why dose a Case Feature move in There Constructions?
생성문법연구
2008 .01
-
On the Locus of the EPP
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
Modified Feature Specifications w.r.t. Anaphoric Dependency
영어영문학연구
2015 .01
-
EPP 효과의 재조명
생성문법연구
2020 .01
-
The EPP on the vP Level in English
생성문법연구
2004 .01
-
The EPP as a Non-featural Requirement on Derivation
생성문법연구
2007 .01
-
통사 자질과 의미 자질
국어국문학
1996 .05
-
국면인식과 관련된 최소주의 문제점
언어과학
2014 .01
-
말지각의 기초표상: 음소 또는 변별자질
말소리와 음성과학
2013 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0