지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay is to analyze ‘fire’ which the writer, Kim So-Wol has used with a unique importance in his works. The word ‘fire’ cannot be said to be a very critical word in his works only to see the frequency of its usage, because it seems as common as any other usage of this word in his quite a few works, but it is shown to be used in a very especial way in his few other works. In particular, we can point out that his works have presented the word ‘fire’ in an outstanding environment in the spaces of a ‘tomb’ or a ‘ridge’. The main critical works being discussed in the essay are some of his works that include the words such as a ‘tomb’, a ‘grass’ and ‘fire’ coordinating in the one work such as Gold Grass(금잔디), Having Lived with my eyes closed(세상 모르고 살았노라) and Cigarette(담배).
To be balanced from a viewpoint to construe that all the individual works are one and thorough art structure with a completeness and thus to separate all of each works, it is, to some extent, useful to review comprehensively usage of words, phrases and sentences that the poet has adopted in some of his works. This essay eventually intends to explain all the in dividual works’s interior completeness and also their meaning, but when their meaning varies, I have referred to the same words in the similar sequences or vocabularies of the other works, so that we could search for the way to interpret all the similar phrases and expressions seen across from his various works putting them into one and consistent category.
Through the discussion of the essay, let me conclude that the writer, in the works that I have selected for the essay, apparently or implicitly wishes to appose his wish of burning grasses with his desire to recover his ‘nim(님, the lover)’ who is already dead. In that sense, I have offered that there is a way of understanding ‘the grass’ as metonymy of a ‘tomb’ regarding the way of interpreting three respective words-a tomb, a grass and fire-as all in a consistent meaning. So the tomb, in the poem referred to death of ‘nim’, can be reflected to the impossible desire to recover and therefore to eliminate the tomb. This plays a role of activating each of his works by making them become more valuable and more poetic, but it gives a boundary in a sense of presenting the obsession to a dream impossible to make come true as Invoking a Soul(초혼) does.
To be balanced from a viewpoint to construe that all the individual works are one and thorough art structure with a completeness and thus to separate all of each works, it is, to some extent, useful to review comprehensively usage of words, phrases and sentences that the poet has adopted in some of his works. This essay eventually intends to explain all the in dividual works’s interior completeness and also their meaning, but when their meaning varies, I have referred to the same words in the similar sequences or vocabularies of the other works, so that we could search for the way to interpret all the similar phrases and expressions seen across from his various works putting them into one and consistent category.
Through the discussion of the essay, let me conclude that the writer, in the works that I have selected for the essay, apparently or implicitly wishes to appose his wish of burning grasses with his desire to recover his ‘nim(님, the lover)’ who is already dead. In that sense, I have offered that there is a way of understanding ‘the grass’ as metonymy of a ‘tomb’ regarding the way of interpreting three respective words-a tomb, a grass and fire-as all in a consistent meaning. So the tomb, in the poem referred to death of ‘nim’, can be reflected to the impossible desire to recover and therefore to eliminate the tomb. This plays a role of activating each of his works by making them become more valuable and more poetic, but it gives a boundary in a sense of presenting the obsession to a dream impossible to make come true as Invoking a Soul(초혼) does.
목차
1. 서론
2. 본론
3. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
평양 지역 고구려 왕릉의 위치와 피장자
한국고대사연구
2017 .12
-
김수영의 「풀」에 대한 해석학적 고찰
어문학
2007 .06
-
대구 달성고분군의 편년과 성격
야외고고학
2020 .01
-
中國古代의 守墓制度
동양사학연구
2013 .09
-
고구려와 백제의 고분문화
고구려발해연구
2005 .09
-
영산강유역 원형분의 출현 배경과 의미
야외고고학
2018 .01
-
6~7세기 高句麗왕릉과 百濟·新羅왕릉의 구조 비교
고구려발해연구
2008 .03
-
신대동 고구려고분군 발굴 정형에 대하여(중)
한국사학보
2018 .02
-
김수영의 `풀의 시학` 연구 : 「풀」의 해석을 중심으로
한국시학연구
2017 .02
-
연접묘를 통해 본 고구려 적석총의 전개 과정
중앙고고연구
2020 .01
-
1920년대 시의 ‘무덤’ 이미지와 공동체적 노래의 장소들 - 홍사용의 「묘장(墓場)」 연작시, 김소월의 「무덤」 을 중심으로
한국문학과 예술
2019 .09
-
신라 전기 적석목곽분의 묘형과 집단복합묘군의 성격
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2017 .01
-
고구려 적석총의 被葬者에 관한 재검토
한국사연구
2008 .12
-
신대동 고구려고분군 발굴 정형에 대하여(상)
한국사학보
2017 .11
-
김수영의 시「풀」에 나타난 상징적 의미와 그 초월성
민족문화연구
2004 .01
-
신대동 고구려고분군 발굴 정형에 대하여(하)
한국사학보
2018 .05
-
南韓內高句麗古墳의 檢討
고구려발해연구
2009 .11
-
조선시대 횡혈묘의 출현과 구조
울산사학
2016 .12
-
울산지역 5~6세기 목곽묘에 대하여
울산사학
2014 .12
-
Art Objects from Ancient Tombs
Korea Journal
1977 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-811-016459372