메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第24卷 第2號
발행연도
2008.2
수록면
261 - 272 (12page)

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Urban development was spearheaded by modern architecture, which caused many problems since the late 20th century. Environmental issues, in particular, have emerged as one of the most serious problems. So this study is an interdisciplinary research that aims to seek the interrelationship between environmental discourses, typology of environment-friendly architecture and urban space.
This study undertook a broad range of case studies including office buildings, residential-commercial mixed use buildings and housing in Britain, Germany, Japan, Australia and South Korea in order to analyse a broad range of environmwntally friendly architecture. These case studies were first analysed in terms of three main environmental theoretical approaches such as technocentrism, ecocentrism and anthropocentrism (or eco-socialism as it is better known). This result was mapped on the urban hierarchy, technocentric typological buildings mainly being office buildings were located in or near the city centre. Anthropocentric type buildings that eccentuates the need for community and social sustainability were found in the general urban to suburban urban areas In the meanwhile, cases of biocentrism largely featured in the outskirts of cities and countryside as they need more land for self-sufficiency for food and treating waste organically with emphasis on small commune type developments.
Environmental discourses such as technocentrism, biocentrism and anthropocentrism, which proposes different visions of future settlements should not be regarded as opposing political solutions but should be used as different spatial strategies. This study suggests that three approaches are all relevant environmental strategies in different locations, ie each approach are spatial strategies in different urban hierarchy. The technocentrism and its architectural types are ecological solution for urban core, whereas anthropocentrist approach a solution for social sustainability in general residential areas in urban and suburban locations and biocentrist solution being appropriate for the rural areas. The necessity of economic sustainability of cities dictate the differentiated locational factors of ecological techniques as well as density of developments. And, therefore, appropriate adoption of differentiated types of ecological approaches and related buildings in accordance with the hierarchy of urban spaces are needed in order to address the sustainability of human environment.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 이론고찰
3. 친환경 건축의 사례 분석
4. 생태건축과 환경론, 그리고 도시공간의 종합분석
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-016386283