지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is an attempt to study the idea of the subject suitable for the digital, cybernetic and genetic age through the discussion about the subject in posthumanism and William Gibson's Neuromancer.
In the technophile and technophobic perspectives in posthumanism, there are many opinions about the subject constituted within the distorted framework of liberal humanism. So the perspectives work as a limit to the constitution of the new subject, for liberal humanism has played an important part in causing the subject's present painful problems. These perspectives also help to accelerate the circumstances that the subject is fully controlled and subordinated in the dominant scientific and technological order ruled by the logic of capitalism.
The perspectives are revealed in Neuromancer. Most of characters including the hero, Case, follow the paradigm which regards the human subject as an informational-material entity, estimate other subjects and objects by it. The paradigm that they accepted naturally is the typical one in posthumanism which has been discussed within the distorted framework of liberal humanism, and make them caught in the perverted dominant technological order. They also adapt themselves for the circumstances that everything is controlled by the advanced technology linked with the logic of capital. In this regards, they can not become the desirable and new subject suitable for the advanced technological age.
Therefore, to globe for the possible ways to constitute the new subject, this paper proposes that the subject should know the logic of liberal humanist mechanism and paradigm which is projected into the posthumanism. It also proposes that the subject should not follow blindly the logic of capital, and should reflect dominant technological conditions made by the logic.
In the technophile and technophobic perspectives in posthumanism, there are many opinions about the subject constituted within the distorted framework of liberal humanism. So the perspectives work as a limit to the constitution of the new subject, for liberal humanism has played an important part in causing the subject's present painful problems. These perspectives also help to accelerate the circumstances that the subject is fully controlled and subordinated in the dominant scientific and technological order ruled by the logic of capitalism.
The perspectives are revealed in Neuromancer. Most of characters including the hero, Case, follow the paradigm which regards the human subject as an informational-material entity, estimate other subjects and objects by it. The paradigm that they accepted naturally is the typical one in posthumanism which has been discussed within the distorted framework of liberal humanism, and make them caught in the perverted dominant technological order. They also adapt themselves for the circumstances that everything is controlled by the advanced technology linked with the logic of capital. In this regards, they can not become the desirable and new subject suitable for the advanced technological age.
Therefore, to globe for the possible ways to constitute the new subject, this paper proposes that the subject should know the logic of liberal humanist mechanism and paradigm which is projected into the posthumanism. It also proposes that the subject should not follow blindly the logic of capital, and should reflect dominant technological conditions made by the logic.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일반적 포스트휴머니즘과『뉴로맨서』의 주체
Ⅲ. 일반적 포스트휴머니즘과『뉴로맨서』에 투영된 자본의 논리와 주체의 문제
Ⅳ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Posthuman Entities and Late Capitalism in William Gibson’s Neuromancer
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
포스트휴머니즘의 시대에서의 삼위일체
한국조직신학논총
2019 .01
-
『뉴로맨서』에 나타난 기술공포주의
스토리앤이미지텔링
2016 .12
-
포스트휴머니즘에 기반 한 응용언어학의 성격과 연구의 방향
이중언어학
2019 .01
-
“What a Difference a Tail Makes”: Woolf, Modernism, Feminist Posthumanism
영미문학페미니즘
2019 .01
-
인종과 포스트휴먼: 비판적 분석
미국소설
2018 .01
-
포스트휴먼시대의 다중접속 이타성의 윤리와 예술
윤리연구
2017 .01
-
테크노사피엔스(Tschnosapience)의 감수성과 소수자 문학 －윤이형 소설을 중심으로－
우리문학연구
2020 .01
-
We Have Never Been Non-Hybrid: The Cyborg as Our Existential Mode in the Posthuman Age
영어영문학21
2012 .01
-
歷史的 主體에 對하여
코기토
1980 .12
-
과학에 대한 D.H. 로렌스의 태도와 포스트휴먼 사상
D. H. 로렌스 연구
2011 .01
-
포스트휴머니즘 비평과 SF : 미래 인간을 위한 문학과 비평 이론의 모색
비평문학
2018 .06
-
트랜스-/포스트휴머니즘에 대한 신학적-비판적 고찰 - 신학적 인간론과의 비교를 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2019 .10
-
포스트휴머니즘과 인식적 변화의 필요성 고찰: <엑스 마키나>
동서비교문학저널
2020 .03
-
포스트휴머니즘은 휴머니즘이 될 수 있는가? : 포스트휴머니즘 논쟁을 통해 본 휴머니즘의 의미와 한계
인간연구
2018 .11
-
우리는 어떻게 포스트휴먼 주체가 될 수 있는가?
철학연구
2014 .09
-
도스토예프스키의 「역겨운 일화」에 나타난 휴머니즘
러시아어문학연구논집
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-016103885