지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 103 - 121 (19page)
- DOI
- 10.23948/kshw.2004.12.7.103
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to survey and analyze the degrees and influence factors of job satisfaction of health promotion program workers' in health center, health subcenter and community health post in Jeonbuk Provinces.
A questionnaire was devised consisting of total 30 items including 5 items of wage, 5 items of relationships with colleagues, 5 items of supervisors, the organization, 5 items of job speciality and 5 items of duties. Total 141 questionnaires were collected. The period of research was from september 25 to october 22, 2004. The statistical methods to analyze the data included frequency distribution, percentile, reliability analysis, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation analysis.
The results of the study are as follows:
First, the total job satisfactions of the respondents appeared to be highly with a mean of 3.16. By subarea, they showed the degree of wage(M=3.31), relationships with colleagues(M=3.27), supervisors(M=2.98), the organization(M= 3.01), job speciality(M=3.41) and duties(M=2.86). Respondents showed the highest degree of job satisfaction in job speciality. On the other hand, they showed the highest dissatisfaction with duties.
Second, the difference on job satisfaction by 3 variables are as follows.
1) Age : total job satisfaction by age made no significant difference; 30～39 years old(M=3.13), 40～49 years old(M=3.18) and 50～59 years old(M=3.17).
2) Academic background : total job satisfaction by academic background made no significant difference; graduated high school(M=3.25), collage(M=3.17), graduated university(M=3.15) and postgraduate university(M=2.91)
3) Place of duty : total job satisfaction by place of duty made significant difference; health promotion program workers' who health center(M=3.29) and health subcenter(M=3.21) more highly total job satisfaction than community health post(M=3.06). By subarea, they made significant difference of relationships with wage, colleagues, supervisors, the organization, job speciality and duties.
Third, the results of Pearson's correlation analysis showed all positive relationships among the six areas of job satisfaction(wage, relationships with colleagues, supervisors, the organization, job speciality and duties). Especially, there were the highest correlations between total job satisfaction and the organization(r=.792, p＜.01) and highly between wage and the duties(r=.556, p＜.01).
A questionnaire was devised consisting of total 30 items including 5 items of wage, 5 items of relationships with colleagues, 5 items of supervisors, the organization, 5 items of job speciality and 5 items of duties. Total 141 questionnaires were collected. The period of research was from september 25 to october 22, 2004. The statistical methods to analyze the data included frequency distribution, percentile, reliability analysis, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation analysis.
The results of the study are as follows:
First, the total job satisfactions of the respondents appeared to be highly with a mean of 3.16. By subarea, they showed the degree of wage(M=3.31), relationships with colleagues(M=3.27), supervisors(M=2.98), the organization(M= 3.01), job speciality(M=3.41) and duties(M=2.86). Respondents showed the highest degree of job satisfaction in job speciality. On the other hand, they showed the highest dissatisfaction with duties.
Second, the difference on job satisfaction by 3 variables are as follows.
1) Age : total job satisfaction by age made no significant difference; 30～39 years old(M=3.13), 40～49 years old(M=3.18) and 50～59 years old(M=3.17).
2) Academic background : total job satisfaction by academic background made no significant difference; graduated high school(M=3.25), collage(M=3.17), graduated university(M=3.15) and postgraduate university(M=2.91)
3) Place of duty : total job satisfaction by place of duty made significant difference; health promotion program workers' who health center(M=3.29) and health subcenter(M=3.21) more highly total job satisfaction than community health post(M=3.06). By subarea, they made significant difference of relationships with wage, colleagues, supervisors, the organization, job speciality and duties.
Third, the results of Pearson's correlation analysis showed all positive relationships among the six areas of job satisfaction(wage, relationships with colleagues, supervisors, the organization, job speciality and duties). Especially, there were the highest correlations between total job satisfaction and the organization(r=.792, p＜.01) and highly between wage and the duties(r=.556, p＜.01).
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
장애인근로자 장기근속요인에 관한 연구
한국사회복지학
1995 .07
-
지원고용담당자의 직무만족에 관한 연구
지체.중복.건강장애연구
2005 .01
-
노인일자리사업 실무자의 직무만족에 관한 연구
노인복지연구
2008 .12
-
정신보건사회복지사의 직무만족에 관한 연구
한국사회복지행정학
2003 .12
-
사회복지사의 직무특성이 직무만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
한국사회복지학
2006 .05
-
사회복지 종사자의 직무만족에 관한 연구경향 분석
한국사회복지행정학
2010 .03
-
여가만족과 직무만족간의 관계에 관한 연구
관광레저연구
1997 .06
-
장애인표준사업장 근무 지체장애 근로자의 직무만족도 및 직무만족요인에 관한 연구
지체.중복.건강장애연구
2010 .01
-
아동보호전문기관 상담원의 직무만족에 영향을 미치는 요인
사회과학연구
2020 .06
-
보육교사 장기근속에 대한 시설장의 인식 연구
한국보육학회 학술대회자료집
2011 .03
-
사회복지생활시설 종사자의 자기효능감과 요인별 직무만족이 전반적 직무만족에 미치는 영향
한국사회복지학
2006 .08
-
직무요구, 직무통제, 직무불안정성 및 사회적 지원이 은행원의 직무만족에 미치는 영향
경영관리연구
2010 .12
-
요양보호사의 직무만족 영향요인 분석
한국정책과학학회보
2012 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-338-016604464