메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국보건복지학회 보건과 복지 보건과복지 제7집
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
37 - 60 (24page)
DOI
10.23948/kshw.2004.12.7.37

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background Oncologists are aware that their patients use complementary/alternative medicine (CAM). As cancer incidence rates and survival time increase, use of CAM will likely increase. This study assessed the prevalence and predictors of CAM use in the K General Hospital located in Busan area.
Method Subjects were cancer patients at least 18 years of age, hospitalizing at the K General Hospital located in Busan, Korea, between April 7, 2003 and April 14. 2003. After explaining this study in every room, a self-administered questionnaire was given, cancer patients completed a self-administered questionnaire. The completed questionnaires were collected after 4 hours. Differences between CAM users and nonusers were assessed by [chi]2 and univariate logistic regression analysis. A multivariate logistic regression model identified the simultaneous impact of demographic, and treatment variables on CAM use; P values were two-sided.
Results Of the 141 participants (response rate, 43.8%), 49.6% had heard of CAM. Of those, 32.6% was using at least one CAM approach. Use was greatest for vitamins and herbs (75.9%), spiritual practices (41.2%), diet therapies (38.4%), and movement and physical therapies (26%) and predicted (P<.05) by chemotherapy.
Conclusion It is necessary for the patients to be holistically approached as human being with disease not as disease itself. If the patients use various complementary and alternative medicines(CAM) and it help the patients to cope with disease and increase psychological stability, it has to be received. The physicians have need of knowing about CAM in order to take counsel with the patients when they want to know about it.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-338-016604439