지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
For the more than last two decades, along with central planning and trade protection, industrial policy is supposed to be dead especially in those countries that have adopted the orthodox economic reform. The traditional debates on industrial policy have been too much focused on its tools or forms like directed credit at specific sectors, control of the entry and exit of firms, export targets, sector-ally differenciated tariff, tax & subsidy rates, and R&D subsidies and so on. However, when the nature of industrial policy is considered that they counteracts the allocative and distributive effects that the markets would otherwise produce(as argued by the theory of comparative advantage), we can argue that, contrary to popular impressions, almost all countries in reality have used and keep using industrial policy. As soon as a government "consciously" or "intentionally" favors some economic activities over others, it is in fact conducting industrial policy. Under the globalization, the most prominent example of industrial policy that is eagerly allowed by the orthodox and the IMP is offering incentives favorably to exports and foreign investment. The only difference is that they do not use the term of industrial policy. The reality itself can be a strong justifi￢cation for industrial policy.
Under the current capitalist market conditions, it cannot be presumed that the government has enough information ex ante for finding where the market failures calling for industrial policy exist or better information for industrial policy than the private sector. As a matter of facts, both of the government and the private sectors have imperfect knowledge and different information constrains. Not only the investment coordination among sectors but also informational coordination are still actual grounds for industrial policy. The recent challenges Korean economy is facing arise from its rapid internationalization and new demands for social policy. It may be a starting point for new industrial policy that the government and the private sectors share the information and constraints the other have while recognizing the relationship between their own objects based on the internationalization of business and the demands for social policy each.
Under the current capitalist market conditions, it cannot be presumed that the government has enough information ex ante for finding where the market failures calling for industrial policy exist or better information for industrial policy than the private sector. As a matter of facts, both of the government and the private sectors have imperfect knowledge and different information constrains. Not only the investment coordination among sectors but also informational coordination are still actual grounds for industrial policy. The recent challenges Korean economy is facing arise from its rapid internationalization and new demands for social policy. It may be a starting point for new industrial policy that the government and the private sectors share the information and constraints the other have while recognizing the relationship between their own objects based on the internationalization of business and the demands for social policy each.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 산업정책에 대한 정당화
Ⅲ. 산업구조의 변화와 산업정책의 과제
Ⅳ. 결론에 붙여: 산업정책에 대한 새로운 접근을 위한 제안
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Korea’s Trade and Industrial Policies: 1948-1998
[KIEP] 연구보고서
1998 .09
-
생태산업단지 개발을 위한 우리나라의 산업ㆍ환경정책의 개선방안
도시행정학보
2002 .04
-
Policies for Industrial Competitiveness Improvement in Europe and their Implications
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2015 .06
-
Industrial Policy Recognized as Organizational Activity to Stimulate Industrial Development
Korea and the World Economy
2001 .03
-
산업정책과 복지정책의 조화와 갈등 : 독일 생산체제의 세계화 대응
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .02
-
산업단지 관리정책의 방향 전환을 위한 소고
한국지역개발학회지
2012 .06
-
대구경북 전략산업에 대한 고찰
경영경제
2008 .02
-
경기도 경제ㆍ산업행정 정책 기조
경기논단
2006 .06
-
New Trends in Public Policy of Industrial Relations in the Developed Countries
한국행정논집
1992 .12
-
산업단지 업종구성에 관한 산업생태학적 연구
도시행정학보
2002 .12
-
DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL PARKS : STRATEGIES AND POLICY ISSUES
학술세미나
1991 .11
-
한국무역ㆍ산업정책의 전개과정과 성격변화에 관한 연구 : 1980년대를 중심으로
무역학회지
2001 .02
-
An Industrial Policy for Europe
Seoul Journal of Economics
2014 .01
-
산업단지 정책 및 입지변화 특성 고찰
한국지역개발학회지
2013 .11
-
사회정책결정과정의 정책네트워크 비교분석 : 국민기초생활보장법과 비정규직근로자보호법 제정과정의 비교를 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2009 .08
-
정책변동의 정책네트워크이론적 분석 : 그린벨트정책을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2002 .05
-
정책네트워크 이론을 이용한 간호사 확보를 위한 정책과정 분석
보건행정학회지
2015 .01
-
The Relation Between Social Policies and Skill Matching - Evidence from 30 Industrial Countries
한국사회학회 심포지움 논문집
2018 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-016588816