메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
저널정보
서울행정학회 서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집 2006 Proceeding of A Joint International Conference
발행연도
2006.7
수록면
47 - 81 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Stadium and arena projects have become centerpieces of downtown redevelopment efforts. Between 1990 and 2006, it is estimated that $10 billion will be spent on the construction of professional athletic venues, of which public subsidies will account for 70 to 80 percent (Noll and Zimbalist 1997). A review of the literature shows that stadiums and arenas are insignificant in terms of creating employment, engendering aggregate increases in local spending, and increasing per capita income levels. Public subsidies, then, may be better justified with reference to the non-pecuniary, public good externalities of professional athletic venues. This research examines whether the public good externalities of Baltimore's Oriole Park and Cleveland's Jacobs Field justify the use of taxpayer resources to finance such projects. The public good externalities include civic pride, city reputation, national identity, and patrimony. Baltimore and Cleveland metropolitan area residents were surveyed via telephone using random probability sampling methods. A total of 330 responses were obtained from the Baltimore metropolitan area (55 percent response rate), while 346 responses were obtained from the Cleveland metropolitan area (58 percent response rate). This research supports the conclusion that the public good externalities of Oriole Park and Jacobs Field are determinants of willingness to support the use of taxpayer resources to finance stadium projects. In other words, the public good externalities seemingly justify public stadium subsidies, and therefore a comprehensive assessment of proposed capital expenditures should account for such externalities.

목차

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE REVIEW
METHODOLOGY
RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-016547764