지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The history of the Korean people in the 20th century began with the Japanese imperial occupation of the Korean soil, and also all kinds of pains that entailed such barbaric infringement upon the sovereignty of the Korean people. The liberation of Korea became the ultimate objective of the utmost importance shared by all Korean people, and to the Korean people the struggles that continued to that end were the sole legitimate efforts needed for the independence-seeking Korea. The movements for Independence continued in various shapes and forms, and such shapes and forms were determined by the difference of opinions over the issue of the ideology that would later nourish the new government which would be established by the Korean people, and also the issue of choosing factions that would lead such government.
Historical studies of those national movements have also been affected by such circumstances that presented subjugation and division. Due to the differences in the South and North governments’ positions, or the differences in the perspectives and views of the individual historians, the terms used in referring to the national movements considerably differed. National movements were sometimes referred to as ‘Independence movements’, and in other occasions they were referred to as ‘National Liberation(Emancipation) movements’. Sometimes they were just called simply, National movements. Such differences, demonstrated by selective terminology, also represented the existence of much bigger differences, such as the differences in the suggested scope and boundaries of the national movements. Even the descriptions of facts were not entirely free from being affected by the author’s ideological preferences and bearings, as such bearings clearly had influences upon the process of choosing events to elaborate in the first place.
In this article, the historical studies of the national movements that have been conducted by the South Korean historians for the past decades will be examined, but not in chronological orders or with thematic classifications. The historical studies will be examined with them arranged in two groups, a group of historical studies that represent the views generally favoring the term ‘Independence movements’, and another group of historical studies that represent the views generally favoring the term ‘National liberation(emancipation) movements’. This kind of categorization is based upon the need to account for the individual historian’s perspective viewing the past and present. And it is expected that such attempt would be helpful to not only the task of evaluating the historical studies that have been conducted so far, but also the task of projecting the course the ensuing historical studies on the subject should take in the future.
Historical studies of those national movements have also been affected by such circumstances that presented subjugation and division. Due to the differences in the South and North governments’ positions, or the differences in the perspectives and views of the individual historians, the terms used in referring to the national movements considerably differed. National movements were sometimes referred to as ‘Independence movements’, and in other occasions they were referred to as ‘National Liberation(Emancipation) movements’. Sometimes they were just called simply, National movements. Such differences, demonstrated by selective terminology, also represented the existence of much bigger differences, such as the differences in the suggested scope and boundaries of the national movements. Even the descriptions of facts were not entirely free from being affected by the author’s ideological preferences and bearings, as such bearings clearly had influences upon the process of choosing events to elaborate in the first place.
In this article, the historical studies of the national movements that have been conducted by the South Korean historians for the past decades will be examined, but not in chronological orders or with thematic classifications. The historical studies will be examined with them arranged in two groups, a group of historical studies that represent the views generally favoring the term ‘Independence movements’, and another group of historical studies that represent the views generally favoring the term ‘National liberation(emancipation) movements’. This kind of categorization is based upon the need to account for the individual historian’s perspective viewing the past and present. And it is expected that such attempt would be helpful to not only the task of evaluating the historical studies that have been conducted so far, but also the task of projecting the course the ensuing historical studies on the subject should take in the future.
목차
머리말
1. 독립운동사, 분단의 벽에 갇히다
2. 민족해방운동사, 변혁의 열기 속에 개화하다
3. 민족해방투쟁, 근대와 탈근대로부터 협공당하다
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
민족해방운동사 그림전에 관하여
역사비평
1989 .05
-
[사실, 이렇게 본다 1] 지워진 과거, 비틀린 민족해방운동사
내일을 여는 역사
2004 .12
-
2014~2015년 한국독립운동사 연구의 동향과 과제
한국독립운동사연구
2016 .02
-
한국기독교민족운동사 연구의 현황과 과제
한국기독교와 역사
2000 .03
-
남북의 독립운동사 연구의 과제와 전망
한국독립운동사연구
2001 .12
-
해방전후의 민족통합운동
한국독립운동사연구
1998 .12
-
중국에서 한국여성독립운동사 연구 현황과 과제
여성과역사
2019 .01
-
해방 직후 북한학계의 민족해방운동사 인식과 편찬 : 조선력사편찬위원회 간행 『조선민족해방투쟁사』의 검토
한국사학보
2004 .11
-
연구동향 세계 대공황기 민족해방운동사 연구동향
역사와현실
1993 .12
-
대담 중국연변, 민족해방운동사 연구의 고민과 과제
역사비평
1993 .11
-
1980년대 의식과 감성이 빚어낸 중국 관내지역 한국독립운동사 : 김영범, 『혁명과 의열－한국독립운동사의 내면』
한국독립운동사연구
2011 .12
-
『한국독립운동사연구』50집 간행(1987~2015)의 성과와 연구사적 의의
한국독립운동사연구
2015 .08
-
광복 60주년과 한국독립운동사 연구
역사학보
2006 .09
-
3 · 1운동사 연구의 최근 동향과 방향성
역사와현실
2018 .12
-
독립운동사 교육에서 사적지 활용방법과 그 효과 : 『국내 항일독립운동사적지 조사보고서』 활용수업을 중심으로
한국독립운동사연구
2011 .08
-
통일시대 남북의 독립운동사 인식
한국독립운동사연구
2001 .12
-
운동사 연구반 10년을 추억하며
한국역사연구회회보
1999 .10
-
東北 지역 한민족독립운동사 관련 사료 상황
한국독립운동사연구
2002 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
1920년대 전반기 민족주의와 사회주의
김정인
한국역사연구회회보
2000
.01
[논문] 1920년대 전반기 민족담론의 전개와 좌우투쟁
김정인
역사와현실
2001
.03
1960년대 ‘근대화론’의 學界유입과 한국사 연구 : ‘근대화’를 주제로 내세운 학술기획을 중심으로
신주백
사학연구
2017
.03
일제 총동원체제의 기원과 특징에 대한 재검토 : 전쟁인류학의 모색
진필수
비교문화연구
2016
.07
일제강점기 유학적 지식인의 사회주의 수용과 민족운동 : 1920년대 경북 남부지역 사회운동을 중심으로
심상훈
동아인문학
2014
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017609199