메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 제37권 제5호
발행연도
2002.10
수록면
101 - 112 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Although many of housing renewal projects contributed to an increase in home ownership for moderate income families, there were no guideline or program considerations for tenants and poor families in the settlement areas. As a result, many redeveloped areas plunged into turmoil and brought in more urban unrest. The original intent of most renewal projects shifted because of housing speculation and attracted more middle and upper income families into the projects. In order to make a more effective renewal projects in the future, it is necessary to evaluate the housing renewal projects by the residents (owner occupiers and tenants) who were reoccupied after redevelopment. It is apparent that the housing renewal projects contributed physical improvement and upgrading in the low-income residential areas. But the residents responded that the socio-economic and cultural factors of the original community have not considered, particularly the poor's need of welfare facilities and affordability for the newly developed house. The survey evidence demonstrates that the reoccupied homeowners and tenants have different viewpoint and responses on some factors, such as burdensome of cost sharing, affordability, estate environment, and public facilities. Neighborhoods and grassroots efforts have not always been viewed as a central force for the housing renewal projects.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 재개발의 통합적 요소에 대한 이론적 논의
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 주택재개발사업의 통합적 평가결과
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-539-017536624