지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is to clear the reorganization plan for the national governing system of the bureaucracy of Interior, and to search the implementation moment from 1920s to 1930s giving prominence to the difference between the bureaucracy of Interior and the bureaucracy of Judiciary, through the constitution process of the Peace Preservation Law and National polity accepted in the revising period in 1928.
Although it was impossible to object the absoluteness of National polity, the private ownership system of the modern capitalist countries and National polity of the traditional community country are recognized to have the same worth. Because the bureaucracy of Interior was on the center of constituting the Peace Preservation Law, it was to unite National polity ,which are the unique social assessment in Japan, with political state system based on modern rationalism.
Suzuki and Yamaoka not only kept an eye on communism but also controled the American and British thinking which was negative to Japanese value after the event of 15th Mar. They was to effectuate the Japanese value instead of the American and British value and revised the Peace Preservation Law by the urgent royal edict through the event of 15th Mar. There was also the bureaucracy of Judiciary to regulate as antiestablishment movements both socialism to deny the modern political nations and the American and British value to deny community countries in which moral enlightenment is the major principal.
To unite modern political state based on capitalism with traditional community state on an equal footing, the bureaucracy of Interior sought the centripetal force from National polity. The bureaucracy of Judiciary recognized National polity as the basis of moral country for public order.
Although it was impossible to object the absoluteness of National polity, the private ownership system of the modern capitalist countries and National polity of the traditional community country are recognized to have the same worth. Because the bureaucracy of Interior was on the center of constituting the Peace Preservation Law, it was to unite National polity ,which are the unique social assessment in Japan, with political state system based on modern rationalism.
Suzuki and Yamaoka not only kept an eye on communism but also controled the American and British thinking which was negative to Japanese value after the event of 15th Mar. They was to effectuate the Japanese value instead of the American and British value and revised the Peace Preservation Law by the urgent royal edict through the event of 15th Mar. There was also the bureaucracy of Judiciary to regulate as antiestablishment movements both socialism to deny the modern political nations and the American and British value to deny community countries in which moral enlightenment is the major principal.
To unite modern political state based on capitalism with traditional community state on an equal footing, the bureaucracy of Interior sought the centripetal force from National polity. The bureaucracy of Judiciary recognized National polity as the basis of moral country for public order.
목차
〈要旨〉
1. 서론
2. 治安維持法 제정의 협의과정에 나타난 兩省의 「??」론
3. 제50회 제국의회 심의과정에 나타난 「??」론
4. 治安維持法 개정(1928년) 논리로써의 일본적 가치관과 「??」론
5. 결론
?考文?
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Bureaucracy, 1948-1979
학술대회
2005 .12
-
Bureaucracy in Korea
Korea Journal
1980 .08
-
The Korean Bureaucracy and Political Development in Korea
Korea Journal
1978 .01
-
Bureaucracy and the Military
Korea Journal
1986 .09
-
관료와 정치권력
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1996 .04
-
산업화와 한국관료제의 탈관료화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1996 .04
-
일본의 근대관료 연구 시각에 대한 비판적 검토
일본문화연구
2005 .10
-
朝鮮時期의 官僚制度 및 그 운영의 특성 : 부정부패의 구조적 원인과 관련하여
한국사연구
2005 .09
-
傳統時代 韓國 官僚制의 歷史的 展開過程
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1996 .04
-
위임 입법의 정치적 원인 그리고 이에 따른 정치적 결과: 한미 의원활동 비교
한국시민윤리학회보
2009 .01
-
韓國의 官僚集團과 國家政策決定
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1996 .04
-
현대러시아 관료제의 부정적 특징에 대한 소고
슬라브학보
2001 .06
-
4~5세기 한국 고대사와 고고학의 몇 가지 문제
한국고대사연구
2001 .12
-
梁啓超의 ‘帝國’論과 ‘大淸帝國’의 國體
동양사학연구
2015 .09
-
蒙古의 漢族統治와 女眞官僚의 寄與
역사와실학
2004 .09
-
Home Style in a Developing Polity : How Korean Legislators Communicate with Their Constituents
Korea Journal
1990 .05
-
한국의 관료제와 민주주의 : 어떻게 관료를 통제할 것인가
역사비평
2014 .08
-
Political Thought behind Korean National
Korea Journal
1976 .04
-
장로교회 제도의 역사적 고찰
신학정론
1992 .12
-
「옴부즈맨」(Ombudsman)制와 代表的 官僚制(Representative Bureaucracy)의 韓國 導入의 必要性과 그 適用方法 硏究
성곡논총
1988 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-730-017430048